Comparison of stAndard and Hybrid Surgical Techniques in the Treatment of proximaL Aortic dissEctions

NCT ID: NCT03711136

Last Updated: 2018-10-18

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

100 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-01-01

Study Completion Date

2018-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The study is devoted to the evaluation of the results of surgical treatment of patients with proximal aortic dissection. Two groups of patients with standard and hybrid surgery are compared. Early and long-term postoperative results are evaluated.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

State of Non-operated Aortic Segments Aorto-related Events

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Frozen elephant trunk surgery

aortic prosthesis

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

ascending aortic and/or aortic arch prosthesis with linear vascular prosthesis or hybrid prosthesis

Standart surgery

aortic prosthesis

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

ascending aortic and/or aortic arch prosthesis with linear vascular prosthesis or hybrid prosthesis

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

aortic prosthesis

ascending aortic and/or aortic arch prosthesis with linear vascular prosthesis or hybrid prosthesis

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* aortic dissection type A

Exclusion Criteria

* age limits
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Novosibirsk Scientific Research Institute for Circulatory Pathology

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Alexander Edemskiy

cardiovascular surgeon

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

NRICP

Novosibirsk, , Russia

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Russia

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CASTLE

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Neuroaxial Prophylaxis for CABG
NCT04244435 UNKNOWN EARLY_PHASE1
Protection During Cardiac Surgery.
NCT03230136 COMPLETED NA
Etomidate Versus Propofol in CABG Surgery
NCT06068764 RECRUITING PHASE4