Long-term Comparison of Stenting Versus Off-pump Coronary Bypass Surgery

NCT ID: NCT00975858

Last Updated: 2009-09-15

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

280 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

1998-01-31

Study Completion Date

2001-02-28

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The randomized comparison of two strategies in coronary revascularization: bypass surgery without the use of a heart lung machine and coronary stenting procedure.

The comparison comprised the occurrence of cardiac adverse events after the procedure. In addition, costs, cognitive outcomes and angiography were assessed.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Coronary artery bypass surgery with use of the heart lung machine (on-pump surgery), is associated with the risk of peri-operative complications such as death, stroke, myocardial infarction, neurocognitive decline, and extended hospitalization. Bypass surgery on the beating heart without the use of the heart lung machine (off-pump surgery) has been reintroduced in clinical practice in order to reduce these complications. The Octopus cardiac wall stabilizer, developed at the UMC Utrecht, facilitates the safe construction of the grafts during the off-pump procedure. The expected advantages of off-pump surgery e.g. less-invasiveness, complete arterial revascularization, faster recovery and lower costs were the basis for the Octostent trial. We hypothesized that the off-pump surgical technique might offer an alternative for angioplasty with bare-metal stent-implantation.

The current study was designed as a randomized controlled multicenter trial comparing two strategies.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Coronary Artery Disease

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Coronary Revascularization

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

revascularization of coronary arteries in case of symptomatic obstructive coronary artery disease

Off Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Coronary Revascularization

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

revascularization of coronary arteries in case of symptomatic obstructive coronary artery disease

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Coronary Revascularization

revascularization of coronary arteries in case of symptomatic obstructive coronary artery disease

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Stenting PCI OPCAB MICAB

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* patients with coronary artery disease referred for PCI in which both Off Pump Coronary Bypass surgery and PCI were deemed technically feasible

Exclusion Criteria

* a history of CABG or stenting
* emergency or concomitant major surgery
* Q-wave myocardial infarction in the last six weeks
* inability to give informed consent
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

St. Antonius Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Isala

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

UMC Utrecht

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

UMC Utrecht

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Hendrik M Nathoe, MD PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

UMC Utrecht

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

UMC Utrecht

Utrecht, , Netherlands

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Netherlands

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Eefting F, Nathoe H, van Dijk D, Jansen E, Lahpor J, Stella P, Suyker W, Diephuis J, Suryapranata H, Ernst S, Borst C, Buskens E, Grobbee D, de Jaegere P. Randomized comparison between stenting and off-pump bypass surgery in patients referred for angioplasty. Circulation. 2003 Dec 9;108(23):2870-6. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000100723.50363.2C. Epub 2003 Dec 1.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 14656913 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

WOM protocol 98/009

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Patency-Coronary Trial
NCT01414049 UNKNOWN NA
CABG Without the Use of CPB
NCT00202332 COMPLETED PHASE2