Comparing Surgical Decompression Versus Conservative Treatment in Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury
NCT ID: NCT01367405
Last Updated: 2016-10-13
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
NA
1 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2013-10-31
2015-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Recently, it has been shown that the distinction of TCCS with an incomplete cervical spinal cord lesion (ICSCL) is artificial. It is the most frequent incomplete traumatic spinal cord lesion. It accounts for up to 70 % of all incomplete cervical spinal cord lesions. The exact incidence is not known.
Uncertainty about the treatment exists. A good recovery has been described after conservative treatment. Conservative treatment was usually considered when a fracture or dislocation of the spine were absent. It is often seen in hyperextension trauma in the elderly with degenerative spondylotic stenotic cervical spine. However, some reports suggest a better outcome after surgical decompression. Randomized trials have not been performed. To avoid discussion about possible confounding or effect modification related to the mechanism of trauma, this study will focus on ICSCL in patients without fracture or instability of the cervical spine on radiological examination. Also the problem of crossover from the conservative group to the surgical one due to the nature of spinal instability will be reduced.
Goal of the study: To compare the efficacy of early decompressive surgery to improve functional outcome in patients with ICSCL without a fracture or instability of the cervical spine compared to those receiving conservative treatment.
Definition of ICSCL in this study: ICSCL is an incomplete spinal cord lesion due to a cervical spine trauma. At CT scanning with reconstruction and at MRI signs are not seen that could indicate a fracture of the cervical spine or instability. An overt sequestrated herniated disc should not be present since this will always necessitate immediate surgery. Involvement of the cervical spinal cord should be established at physical examination (symptomatic arm or hand dysfunction is obligatory).
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Surgical Treatment for Spinal Cord Injury
NCT01674764
Surgical Management of Spinal Cord Injuries In Neck
NCT00475748
Task Practice and Spinal Cord Stimulation
NCT06494020
Spinal Cord Associative Plasticity Study
NCT05163639
Neural Plasticity and Motor Recovery After Upper Extremity Motor Training in People With c-SCI
NCT06065384
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
surgical decompression
surgical decompression within 24 hours post-injury
Surgical decompression
Surgical decompression within 24 hour postinjury
Conservative treatment
Normal conservative treatment without surgical intervention
Conservative treatment
Usual conservative treatment without surgery
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Surgical decompression
Surgical decompression within 24 hour postinjury
Conservative treatment
Usual conservative treatment without surgery
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* a preexistent neurologic deficit of arms and/or legs
* psychiatric illness
* significant comorbidity interfering with the indication to perform surgery or not
* use of anticoagulating drugs
* addiction to drugs or alcohol (more than five units daily)
* not speaking Dutch language fluently
* not willing to participate
* participating in another trial
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Radboud University Medical Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Ronald Bartels, M.D.,Ph.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Radboud University Medical Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center
Nijmegen, Gelderland, Netherlands
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Bartels RH, Hosman AJ, van de Meent H, Hofmeijer J, Vos PE, Slooff WB, Oner FC, Coppes MH, Peul WC, Verbeek AL. Design of COSMIC: a randomized, multi-centre controlled trial comparing conservative or early surgical management of incomplete cervical cord syndrome without spinal instability. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2013 Jan 31;14:52. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-14-52.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
NL36977.091.11
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.