Strengthening Health Systems for Persons With Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury in South Africa and Sweden

NCT ID: NCT03437850

Last Updated: 2018-02-19

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Total Enrollment

200 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-04-15

Study Completion Date

2020-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

A traumatic spinal cord injury (TSCI) often causes an unprecedented change in functioning by altering bodily structure and function. More specifically, the direct consequences of TSCI to the motor, sensory and autonomic nervous system not only challenge an individual's independency but also the ability to make a positive adjustment to life after injury. In line with this, TSCI survivors often experience threats to their livelihood and becoming integrated members of society. Health systems therefore need to be ready to respond to the myriad of challenges following a TSCI by providing access to specialized and comprehensive services. The provision of specialized care in a time-sensitive manner has shown to be crucial for survival and recovery of functioning after a traumatic spinal cord injury (TSCI). However, little is known about the provision of TSCI care in different international contexts; information which is required for strengthening policy and practice.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Like many unforeseen medical emergencies, a TSCI could lead to early death in the absence of essential emergency and acute care. Hence, the single most important indicator of the quality of medical care is reflected in short- and long-term mortality. However, in order to improve survival after TSCI, it is also important to identify factors and processes of routine practice related to mortality. This could be accomplished by examining the extent to which processes of care reflect international guidelines and standards. These guidelines specifically stress the importance of a systematic approach towards the management of TSCI, which include specialized and comprehensive care that is delivered in a multi-disciplinary manner. More specifically, established success factors of TSCI healthcare have proven to include appropriate emergency management (e.g. transfer logistics to trauma unit), early spinal surgery and admission to specialist units, as well as multidisciplinary care. As a collective, literature has shown that a systematic approach towards the management of TSCI leads to a reduction in mortality, secondary complications and re-hospitalizations, as well as better functional outcomes.

In Sweden, a systematic approach towards the management of TSCI was initiated around the 1970's. A number of studies investigating the acute management and mortality after TSCI found better aligned processes of care, and significantly greater survival, in Sweden, compared with a non-systematic approach to care followed in Greece. More specifically, transfer logistics from the accident scene to a specialized trauma unit, key therapeutic interventions, and timing of spinal surgery were better aligned to the international guidelines for the acute management of adults with SCI. In addition, numerous societal services, such as vocational rehabilitation, modifications of living conditions and workplace insurance, are provided to survivors of TSCI to enhance their independence and societal participation.

Unlike Sweden, South Africa had yet to fully implement a systematic healthcare approach to TSCI management. Access to specialized healthcare services is not only a historic problem in South Africa, but it is further exacerbated by the lack of resources. Only one specialized SCI unit is available in South Africa, serving around 8 million people in the Western Cape Province. With the high incidence of TSCI in South Africa, mainly high risk TSCI patients (e.g. those in need of stabilizing spinal surgery) get access to specialized care at the SCI unit. In contrast, those not prioritized for treatment at the specialized SCI unit are treated at hospitals, including both secondary and tertiary level of care, providing non-specialized SCI health care. The common occurrence of non-specialized care of TSCI survivors in South Africa is alarming, especially as such care has shown to be related to a high mortality rate and the occurrence of preventable secondary complications. To improve the outcome of TSCI in South Africa, there is a crucial need to audit the nature and timing of essential processes of care and model their relationship with mortality, complications and long-term outcomes. Furthermore, given the low one-year mortality in Sweden, a comparison of processes of care between Sweden and South Africa could provide empirical evidence pointing to processes which could be modified.

As a first step to strengthening the management guidelines for TSCI care in South Africa, the overarching aim of this study is to explore health-care processes and outcomes of TSCI care in South Africa and Sweden. Specific aims are to: 1) describe acute processes of TSCI care in South Africa and Sweden in comparison to international guidelines, 2) determine acute- and long-term outcomes of TSCI care, including survival status, secondary complications and functioning in South Africa and Sweden and 3) identify predictors for survival, secondary complications and functioning 12 months post-injury in South Africa and Sweden.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Spinal Cord Injuries

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

South African cohort

Usual care

Intervention Type OTHER

Care as usual, in terms of processes and outcomes, will be collected for all participants in both cohorts

Swedish Cohort

Usual care

Intervention Type OTHER

Care as usual, in terms of processes and outcomes, will be collected for all participants in both cohorts

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Usual care

Care as usual, in terms of processes and outcomes, will be collected for all participants in both cohorts

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* A TSCI defined as a sudden loss of voluntary muscle strength, sensation and autonomic functions below the level of injury, which will vary depending on neurological level of injury and extent of impairment, but must include altered sacral sensation;
* The injury must result in persisting impairment (i.e. not just a concussion) after emergence from neurogenic shock, which generally occurs within the first 24-72 hours after injury;
* Abnormal imaging, such as with Magnetic Resonance Imaging scan or multi-slice Computed Tomography scan;
* 18 years of age;
* Residents of one of the two study settings;
* Those admitted to the government-funded hospitals providing SCI care;
* Those consenting to participate in the study
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

100 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Medical Research Council, South Africa

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Karolinska Institutet

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Karolinska University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of the Western Cape

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Dr Conran Joseph

Lecturer (PhD)

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of the Western Cape

Cape Town, , South Africa

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

South Africa

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Conran Joseph, PhD

Role: CONTACT

+27723719276

Anthea Rhoda, PhD

Role: CONTACT

+27219592542

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Conran Joseph, PhD

Role: primary

+27723719276

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

BM/16/3/24

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Stem Cells in Spinal Cord Injury
NCT03935724 UNKNOWN PHASE2/PHASE3
Spinal Cord Stimulation and Training
NCT05472584 RECRUITING NA