Study Comparing a Nerve Block With Spinal Opiate to Provide Pain Relief for Hip Replacement Surgery
NCT ID: NCT01217294
Last Updated: 2014-04-10
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
108 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2011-05-31
2014-04-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Efficacy of Pain Control After Total Hip Replacement Between Ultrasound Guided Supra-inguinal Fascia Iliaca Block and Intrathecal Morphine
NCT04104204
Total Hip Arthroplasty: Multiple Blocks by UltraSound
NCT01276925
Fascia Iliaca Block for Postoperative Pain Control After Elective Hip Arthroplasty
NCT06534697
PENG Block vs Intrathecal Morphine in Total Hip Arthroplasty
NCT05308420
Pericapsular Nerve Block Versus Intrathecal Morphine for Analgesia After Primary Hip Arthroplasty
NCT06317870
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Spinal anaesthesia is a popular form of RA used in many patients undergoing hip arthroplasty. Opioid drugs are frequently added to the spinal injection in order to prolong post-operative pain relief. However, this is associated with side effects including respiratory depression, urinary retention, nausea and vomiting, and pruritus. Such adverse effects may be uncomfortable for the patient and can delay mobilisation, recovery and eventual discharge.
In patients undergoing hip arthroplasty, peripheral nerve blockade has been shown to improve pain scores and reduce morphine consumption. A peripheral nerve block called the fascia iliaca plane block has shown significant promise as a method of providing sensory blockade of the main nerves which supply pain to the hip. The use of ultrasound for the performance of fascia iliaca plane block has been shown to increase reliability compared with the landmark technique though the clinical benefits of this have not yet been fully investigated.
Compared to nerve stimulation or landmark techniques of nerve localisation, ultrasound has been shown to increase success rates, reduce block onset time, increase block duration, reduce volumes of local anaesthetic required and increase patient satisfaction.
The investigators hypothesise that by increasing the success rate of the fascia iliaca block with ultrasound, it will be possible to achieve superior analgesia post-operatively. Our aim is to assess whether the ultrasound guided fascia iliaca plane block can be used as an alternative to intrathecal morphine in the provision of post-operative analgesia for primary hip arthroplasty. If this is the case, intrathecal opioid could be removed from the spinal anaesthetic. This could in theory have significant safety benefits whilst also reducing side effects. Ultrasound guided fascia iliaca block has not yet been evaluated clinically as a method of providing post-operative analgesia following primary hip arthroplasty. The investigators believe that further investigation of this technique will provide a valuable contribution to existing knowledge and will change current practice.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
spinal morphine, sham block
Spinal anaesthesia with hyperbaric bupivacaine 10 - 15mg as specified by the anaesthetist performing the spinal injection, and with the addition of intrathecal morphine 100 micrograms. Sham ultrasound guided fascia iliaca plane block with saline.
Post-operative analgesia with Paracetamol 1g four times daily, and patient controlled analgesia (PCA) with morphine (1mg bolus, 5 minute lockout period)
spinal morphine
Spinal anaesthesia with hyperbaric bupivacaine 10 - 15mg as deemed appropriate by the anaesthetists performing the spinal injection, and with the addition of intrathecal morphine 100 micrograms. Sham fascia iliaca plane injection with saline.
ultrasound guided fascia iliaca block
Spinal anaesthesia with hyperbaric bupivacaine at a dose between 10 and 15mg as deemed appropriate by the anaesthetic doctor performing the spinal injection, no spinal morphine and fascia iliaca plane block using 2mg/kg levobupivacaine diluted to a total of 40ml with sterile saline.
Post-operative analgesia with Paracetamol 1g four times daily, and patient controlled analgesia (PCA) with morphine (1mg bolus, 5 minute lockout period)
ultrasound guided fascia iliaca block
Spinal anaesthesia with hyperbaric bupivacaine at a dose between 10 and 15mg as deemed appropriate by the anaesthetic doctor performing the spinal injection, no spinal morphine and ultrasound guided fascia iliaca plane block using 2mg/kg levobupivacaine diluted to a total of 40ml with sterile saline.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
ultrasound guided fascia iliaca block
Spinal anaesthesia with hyperbaric bupivacaine at a dose between 10 and 15mg as deemed appropriate by the anaesthetic doctor performing the spinal injection, no spinal morphine and ultrasound guided fascia iliaca plane block using 2mg/kg levobupivacaine diluted to a total of 40ml with sterile saline.
spinal morphine
Spinal anaesthesia with hyperbaric bupivacaine 10 - 15mg as deemed appropriate by the anaesthetists performing the spinal injection, and with the addition of intrathecal morphine 100 micrograms. Sham fascia iliaca plane injection with saline.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Competent to give consent
* ASA physical status I - III
* 18-85 years of age, inclusive
* 50-110 kg, inclusive
* Scheduled for unilateral primary hip arthroplasty
Exclusion Criteria
* Contraindication to spinal anaesthesia
* Coagulopathy, malignancy or infection in the inguinal area
* Patient preference for general anaesthesia
* Allergy to opioids
* Significant peripheral neuropathy or neurologic disorder affecting the lower extremity
* Pregnancy
* History of alcohol or drug dependency / abuse
* History of long term opioid intake
* History of significant psychiatric conditions that may affect patient assessment
18 Years
85 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde
OTHER
Rachel Kearns
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Rachel Kearns
co-investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
John Kinsella, MBBS MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University Section of Anaesthesia, Glasgow University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Glasgow Royal Infirmary
Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Kearns RJ, Macfarlane AJ, Anderson KJ, Kinsella J. Intrathecal opioid versus ultrasound guided fascia iliaca plane block for analgesia after primary hip arthroplasty: study protocol for a randomised, blinded, noninferiority controlled trial. Trials. 2011 Feb 21;12:51. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-12-51.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
GN10AN280
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.