Comparing Suprainguinal Fascia Iliaca Block With Erector Spinae Plane Block in Hip and Proximal Femur Surgery
NCT ID: NCT05642975
Last Updated: 2024-08-26
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
66 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-08-01
2023-05-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Despite their potential advantages, peripheral nerve blocks are still not widely used in people with hip fractures.
The primary objective of this study is to compare patients' postoperative pain scores and opioid consumption.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparison of the Effects of Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG), Suprainguinal Fascia Iliaca Compartment (S-FICB) and 3-1 Blocks on Comfort in Positioning for Unilateral Spinal Anesthesia and Postoperative Pain in Hip Fracture Surgery
NCT05912101
Comparison of Pain Relief After Hip Fracture Surgery: Hip and Groin Nerve Block
NCT06443892
Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) Block on Pain During Participant Positioning for Spinal Anesthesia in Hip Fracture Surgery
NCT06813755
Femoral Nerve Block vs Peri-capsular Nerve Group Block for Hip Fracture Analgesia
NCT05444803
The Effect of Facial Plane Blocks on Postoperative Recovery Quality in Hip Surgery
NCT06389279
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SCREENING
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Suprainguinal Fascia Iliaca Block
The probe was placed over the inguinal ligament in close proximity to the anterior superior iliac spine and oriented in the parasagittal plane. It was then moved inferomedially along the line of the inguinal ligament to visualize the 'bow-tie' sign. After confirming the needle's position, a total volume of 30 ml of bupivacaine 0.25% was injected.
Spinal anesthesia was administered to the patients in a lateral position using 2.5 ml of 0.5% heavy bupivacaine at the L3-L4 level.
Regional Block Comparison
Comparing postoperative pain and opioid consumption in groups
Erector Spinae Plane Block
The L5, L4, and L3 transverse processes and erector spinae muscles posteriorly were identified using ultrasound. The curved 6-2 MHz transducer was initially placed at the mid-vertebral line in the sagittal plane and then shifted laterally to visualize the erector spinae muscle and transverse process of the L3 vertebra. A total volume of 40 ml of bupivacaine 0.25% was injected.
Spinal anesthesia was administered to the patients in a lateral position using 2.5 ml of 0.5% heavy bupivacaine at the L3-L4 level.
Regional Block Comparison
Comparing postoperative pain and opioid consumption in groups
Spinal Anesthesia Group (control)
Spinal anesthesia was administered to the patients in a lateral position using 2.5 ml of 0.5% heavy bupivacaine at the L3-L4 level.
Regional Block Comparison
Comparing postoperative pain and opioid consumption in groups
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Regional Block Comparison
Comparing postoperative pain and opioid consumption in groups
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
100 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Marmara University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Marmara University Hospital
Istanbul, , Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
11.2022.546
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.