Pericapsular Nerve Block Versus Intrathecal Morphine for Analgesia After Primary Hip Arthroplasty

NCT ID: NCT06317870

Last Updated: 2024-08-22

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

80 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-09-10

Study Completion Date

2027-05-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of this clinical trial is to compare the analgesic effect of pericapsular nerve block (PENG) with intrathecal morphine in patients scheduled for total hip replacement surgery. The main question to be answered is whether the PENG block is equivalent to intrathecal morphine in reducing postoperative pain.

Participants will be randomised into two groups. Patients assigned to the PENG group will receive spinal anaesthesia with local anaesthetic (isobaric bupivacaine) alone and a PENG block. Patients assigned to the intrathecal morphine (ITM) group will receive spinal anaesthesia with a mixture of local anaesthetic (isobaric bupivacaine) and morphine (100 mcg) and a sham PENG block to ensure patient blinding.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The aim of this double-blind, non-inferiority study is to compare the analgesic effect of a PENG block with intrathecal morphine in patients scheduled for total hip arthroplasty. Postoperative morphine consumption and pain scores, morphine-related adverse effects and functional parameters will be compared between two groups.

The investigators believe that PENG block provides postoperative analgesia equivalent to intrathecal morphine. The research team plans to enrol 80 patients and randomise them to two groups - pericapsular nerve block (PENG) or intrathecal morphine (ITM). After written informed consent, patients will be allocated to one of the two groups according to a computer-generated randomisation list. The PENG group will receive central spinal anaesthesia with 12.5 mg isobaric bupivacaine followed by a PENG block with 20 cc of 0.75% ropivacaine. ITM groups will receive central spinal anaesthesia with 12.5 mg isobaric bupivacaine and 100 mcg morphine followed by a sham PENG block.

During the surgery, 0.15 mg/kg of dexamethasone iv, 1g acetaminophen iv, 30mg ketorolac iv and 40mg/kg magnesium iv will be administered for post operative analgesia.

In the post-operative care unit, pain management will be provided with as needed with 2mg of IV morphine at ten minute intervals for pain scores \>3. Once spinal motor block has ceded, the patients will be transferred to the surgical ward with a morphine patient controlled analgesia (PCA) pump. The pump parameters will allow 2 mg boluses of morphine with a 10-minute lockout and a maximum dose of 40 mg in 4 hours. Basal analgesia will be provided with paracetamol (1g/6h) and ibuprofen (400mg/8h). Ondansetron (4mg IV) will be provided in case of nausea or vomiting. A research assistant will conduct post operative visits at 2h, 1 day and 2 days post-operatively to record research data. Functional testing will be performed at day 1 and 2 by physiotherapy personnel.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Analgesia Hip Arthropathy Post Operative Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

single centered, prospective, double blinded non inferiority trial
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors
quadruple

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

PENG group

Pericapsular nerve group block

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Pericapsular nerve group block (PENG)

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Spinal anesthesia with intrathecal injection of 12.5 mg of isobaric bupivacaine will be performed, followed by a PENG block.

After skin disinfection, a low frequency curvilinear ultrasound probe (2-5 MHz 8870, BK ultrasound, Peabody Massachussets, US) with a sterile covering will be used to identify the anterior inferior iliac spine, the pubic eminence and the psoas tendon with its fascial plane. A 22 gauge 10cm block needle (Sonoplex® Pajunk, Geisingen, DE), will be used to enter the fascial plane and 20ml of 0.75% Ropivacain (Fresenius Kabi, Krienz CH) will be injected.

ITM group

intrathecal morphine injection

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Intrathecal morphine

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Spinal anesthesia will be performed as follows: patient will be placed in the lateral decubitus position on the non-operative side. Using sterile gloves red chlorhexidine 2% alcohol solution will be used for skin disinfection. The site will be secured with a sterile drape, and the L4-L5 lumbar space identified. After subcutaneous local infiltration with 1% lidocaine, a 25G Whitacre pencil point spinal needle will be used to access the intrathecal space with free flow of cerebrospinal fluid as confirmation. A mixture of 12.5 mg of isobaric bupivacaine and 100 mcg of morphine will be administered intrathecally.

After the spinal anesthesia, the intrathecal morphine (ITM) group will receive a sham PENG block with the block needle inserted subcutaneously, the anesthesiologist using the same verbal block confirmation commands "aspirate, inject" but the needle withdrawn without injection. This will create the appearance of an identical cutaneous injection site to ensure patient blinding.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Intrathecal morphine

Spinal anesthesia will be performed as follows: patient will be placed in the lateral decubitus position on the non-operative side. Using sterile gloves red chlorhexidine 2% alcohol solution will be used for skin disinfection. The site will be secured with a sterile drape, and the L4-L5 lumbar space identified. After subcutaneous local infiltration with 1% lidocaine, a 25G Whitacre pencil point spinal needle will be used to access the intrathecal space with free flow of cerebrospinal fluid as confirmation. A mixture of 12.5 mg of isobaric bupivacaine and 100 mcg of morphine will be administered intrathecally.

After the spinal anesthesia, the intrathecal morphine (ITM) group will receive a sham PENG block with the block needle inserted subcutaneously, the anesthesiologist using the same verbal block confirmation commands "aspirate, inject" but the needle withdrawn without injection. This will create the appearance of an identical cutaneous injection site to ensure patient blinding.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Pericapsular nerve group block (PENG)

Spinal anesthesia with intrathecal injection of 12.5 mg of isobaric bupivacaine will be performed, followed by a PENG block.

After skin disinfection, a low frequency curvilinear ultrasound probe (2-5 MHz 8870, BK ultrasound, Peabody Massachussets, US) with a sterile covering will be used to identify the anterior inferior iliac spine, the pubic eminence and the psoas tendon with its fascial plane. A 22 gauge 10cm block needle (Sonoplex® Pajunk, Geisingen, DE), will be used to enter the fascial plane and 20ml of 0.75% Ropivacain (Fresenius Kabi, Krienz CH) will be injected.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Male and female patients
* ASA (American Society of Anaesthesiologists) I-III
* 18 years of age or older
* Patients scheduled for elective primary hip arthroplasty
* Able to give written conformed consent autonomously

Exclusion Criteria

* Refusal or inability to give consent
* Allergy to any of: ropivacaine, paracetamol, ibuprofen, ketorolac, morphine, ondansetron or dexamethasone
* Bleeding diathesis
* Neurological deficit of the operative side
* Existing preoperative opioid use
* Renal insufficiency (GFR\<30ml/min according to the Cockroft-Gault formula)
* Hepatic insufficiency
* Pregnant or lactating women
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Eric Albrecht

Prof. Dr. Med. Eric Albrecht, Associate Professor, University of Lausanne

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University Hospital of Lausanne

Lausanne, Canton of Vaud, Switzerland

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Switzerland

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Eric Albrecht, Prof

Role: CONTACT

+41795566341

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Marta Szyszko du Bois d'Aische

Role: primary

+41795564002

Corey Kull

Role: backup

+41795561781

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Anger M, Valovska T, Beloeil H, Lirk P, Joshi GP, Van de Velde M, Raeder J; PROSPECT Working Group* and the European Society of Regional Anaesthesia and Pain Therapy. PROSPECT guideline for total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and procedure-specific postoperative pain management recommendations. Anaesthesia. 2021 Aug;76(8):1082-1097. doi: 10.1111/anae.15498. Epub 2021 May 20.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 34015859 (View on PubMed)

Gonvers E, El-Boghdadly K, Grape S, Albrecht E. Efficacy and safety of intrathecal morphine for analgesia after lower joint arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis with meta-regression and trial sequential analysis. Anaesthesia. 2021 Dec;76(12):1648-1658. doi: 10.1111/anae.15569. Epub 2021 Aug 27.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 34448492 (View on PubMed)

Vitola E, Buraka N, Erts R, Golubovska I, Miscuks A. Effect of different low doses of intrathecal morphine (0.1 and 0.2 mg) on pain and vital functions in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty: a randomised controlled study. BMC Anesthesiol. 2022 Dec 5;22(1):377. doi: 10.1186/s12871-022-01919-8.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 36471258 (View on PubMed)

Kuchalik J, Granath B, Ljunggren A, Magnuson A, Lundin A, Gupta A. Postoperative pain relief after total hip arthroplasty: a randomized, double-blind comparison between intrathecal morphine and local infiltration analgesia. Br J Anaesth. 2013 Nov;111(5):793-9. doi: 10.1093/bja/aet248. Epub 2013 Jul 19.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23872462 (View on PubMed)

Souron V, Delaunay L, Schifrine P. Intrathecal morphine provides better postoperative analgesia than psoas compartment block after primary hip arthroplasty. Can J Anaesth. 2003 Jun-Jul;50(6):574-9. doi: 10.1007/BF03018643.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12826549 (View on PubMed)

Kearns R, Macfarlane A, Grant A, Puxty K, Harrison P, Shaw M, Anderson K, Kinsella J. A randomised, controlled, double blind, non-inferiority trial of ultrasound-guided fascia iliaca block vs. spinal morphine for analgesia after primary hip arthroplasty. Anaesthesia. 2016 Dec;71(12):1431-1440. doi: 10.1111/anae.13620. Epub 2016 Oct 7.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27714758 (View on PubMed)

Roofthooft E, Joshi GP, Rawal N, Van de Velde M; PROSPECT Working Group* of the European Society of Regional Anaesthesia and Pain Therapy and supported by the Obstetric Anaesthetists' Association. PROSPECT guideline for elective caesarean section: updated systematic review and procedure-specific postoperative pain management recommendations. Anaesthesia. 2021 May;76(5):665-680. doi: 10.1111/anae.15339. Epub 2020 Dec 28.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 33370462 (View on PubMed)

Giron-Arango L, Peng PWH, Chin KJ, Brull R, Perlas A. Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) Block for Hip Fracture. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2018 Nov;43(8):859-863. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000847.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30063657 (View on PubMed)

Pascarella G, Costa F, Del Buono R, Pulitano R, Strumia A, Piliego C, De Quattro E, Cataldo R, Agro FE, Carassiti M; collaborators. Impact of the pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block on postoperative analgesia and functional recovery following total hip arthroplasty: a randomised, observer-masked, controlled trial. Anaesthesia. 2021 Nov;76(11):1492-1498. doi: 10.1111/anae.15536. Epub 2021 Jul 1.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 34196965 (View on PubMed)

Lin DY, Brown B, Morrison C, Fraser NS, Chooi CSL, Cehic MG, McLeod DH, Henningsen MD, Sladojevic N, Kroon HM, Jaarsma RL. The Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) block combined with Local Infiltration Analgesia (LIA) compared to placebo and LIA in hip arthroplasty surgery: a multi-center double-blinded randomized-controlled trial. BMC Anesthesiol. 2022 Aug 6;22(1):252. doi: 10.1186/s12871-022-01787-2.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 35933328 (View on PubMed)

Hu J, Wang Q, Hu J, Kang P, Yang J. Efficacy of Ultrasound-Guided Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) Block Combined With Local Infiltration Analgesia on Postoperative Pain After Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Prospective, Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial. J Arthroplasty. 2023 Jun;38(6):1096-1103. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2022.12.023. Epub 2022 Dec 16.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 36529195 (View on PubMed)

Aliste J, Layera S, Bravo D, Jara A, Munoz G, Barrientos C, Wulf R, Branez J, Finlayson RJ, Tran Q. Randomized comparison between pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block and suprainguinal fascia iliaca block for total hip arthroplasty. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2021 Oct;46(10):874-878. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2021-102997. Epub 2021 Jul 20.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 34290085 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CHUV_PENGIT

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

PENG Block for Total Hip Arthroplasty
NCT05944380 COMPLETED PHASE4