Incidence of Simultaneous Epidural and Intravascular Injection

NCT ID: NCT01020929

Last Updated: 2012-06-06

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

200 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2009-07-31

Study Completion Date

2011-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The investigator hopes to learn the incidence of needle placement in both the epidural and intravascular space, and learn mixed epidural-intravascular pattern related to needle type, gauge, and level of injection. We also hope to evaluate the length of fluoroscopy time when using real time fluoroscopy during contrast dye injection, evaluate the radiation exposure to the hands of the physician during this protocol, and confirm the incidence fo intravascular injection and sensitivity of needle flash of blood, In the lumbar spine, vascular contrast patterns are more than twice as likely to appear simultaneous to the anticipated epidural pattern, than they are to occur alone. This is important since practitioners are more likely to miss a vascular pattern that occurs simultaneous to epidural spread, than they are to occur alone. The incidence of intravascular penetration in cervical transforaminal epidural injections is known to exceed that of lumbar injections, however no study has determined the incidence of simultaneous epidural and vascular injection in the cervical spine. This study may prove that real time fluoroscopy during contrast injection is warranted to prevent intravascular injection and resultant side effects to support this as standard of care.

Intermittent fluoroscopy can yield false-negative results for intravascular injection when simultaneous epidural and intravascular injection occurs. This could lead to an increased risk of complication from intravascular injection of medications and reduce overall efficacy. No studies to date have quantified the incidence of needle placement located in both the intravascular space and epidural space simultaneously.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Any patient undergoing a lumbar or cervical transforaminal epidural, as ordered by their treating physician will provide written informed consent before the procedure is conducted. The contents of the consent forms will be used to explain the study to patients. There are no drug treatments associated with the study other than those which are part of the existing treatment plan. There is no subject randomization. Subjects will be recruited consecutively.

Patients with pregnancy, coagulopathy, systemic infection, allergy to contrast dye, mentally disabled or those whom are unable to give informed consent will be excluded from the study.

1. One experienced physician (\>5 years experience) will use intermittent fluoroscopy to place needle for transforaminal epidural position using standard techniques. The physician will then use real time fluoroscopy when injecting the contrast solution to determine pattern of contrast flow (his standard of care).
2. For each individual epidural site (each level and side per patient per setting counted as separate injections) the following will be identified:

1. Patients age
2. Diagnosis (reason for epidural) i.e. spinal stenosis, HNP, DDD
3. Procedure level
4. Gauge of needle
5. Type of needle tip
6. Aspiration of blood in needle hub pre-injection
7. Contrast pattern using real time fluoroscopy
8. Number of attempts of needle positioning
9. Total fluoro time per case
3. The physician will routinely wear a ring radiation badge to determine average radiation exposure to his hand.
4. Analyze results
5. Confirm incidence of intravascular pattern per level and determine incidence of mixed intravascular-epidural pattern per level.
6. Quantify average fluoro exposure time and compare to average flouro time of identical procedures using intermittent fluoroscopy.

All of the procedures for this protocol are standard of care.

All data is collected during the procedure. There will be no follow-ups after the procedure.

We will be asking participants if they are willing to be contacted regarding future research studies that may be of interest to them.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Spinal Diseases

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Blunt Coude

Type of needle tip

Intervention Type DEVICE

Quincke

Type of needle tip

Intervention Type DEVICE

Trucath

Type of needle tip

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Any patient undergoing a lumbar or cervical transforaminal epidural, as ordered by their treating physician.
2. Ability to give informed consent.

Exclusion:

1. Pregnancy
2. Coagulopathy
3. Systemic infection
4. Allergy to contrast dye
5. Mentally disabled or those whom are unable to give informed consent
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Stanford University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Matthew W Smuck

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Stanford University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Stanford University School of Medicine

Stanford, California, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

16750

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

SU-09222009-3980

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Lumbar Interbody Implant Study
NCT04418830 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
INDUCE: A Prospective 2-Year Spine Registry
NCT06971835 NOT_YET_RECRUITING