Ultrasound-Guided Microendoscopic Versus Fluoroscopic-Guided Lumbar Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injections
NCT ID: NCT05729022
Last Updated: 2024-06-21
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
124 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-12-01
2025-12-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Effect of Ultrasound Guidance on Radiation Dose and Procedure Time in Lumbar Transforaminal Epidural Injection
NCT05793528
A Randomized, Equivalence Trial of Percutaneous Lumbar Adhesiolysis and Caudal Epidural Steroid Injections
NCT01053273
Lumbar Transforaminal Anterior Epidural Steroid Injections in Discogenic Low Back Pain
NCT04930211
The Effect of Needle Insertion Angle on Contrast Distribution and Treatment Outcomes in S1 Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injections
NCT06801990
Caudal Versus S1 Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injection for the Treatment of Unilateral S1 Radiculopathy
NCT05711121
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Fluoroscopy
A local anesthetic (2% lidocaine), a 22G, 90mm needle (Quincke spinal needle) is inserted into the skin. Once the needle tip is in its target position, 0.5-5 cc of contrast (Omnipauqe) is injected. If the contrast spread along the spinal nerve into the epidural space, a mixture of 3 cc of 0.125% Marcaine and 40 mg of Depo-Medrol is injected or Diprofos (1/2 ampoule (2 ml) per level).
Fluoroscopy
Fluoroscopy-guided lumbar transforaminal epidural steroid injection.
Ultrasound Microendoscopic
A US device with a curvilinear probe and with a microendoscope (EvoTouch+7 Star Scope), inserted into an 18G needle is used. This group will also receive one AP view fluoroscopy (as control) to check for the diffusion of the contrast material in the epidural space.
Ultrasound microendoscopic technique
Ultrasound-guided microendoscopic lumbar transforaminal epidural steroid injection
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Ultrasound microendoscopic technique
Ultrasound-guided microendoscopic lumbar transforaminal epidural steroid injection
Fluoroscopy
Fluoroscopy-guided lumbar transforaminal epidural steroid injection.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Disease status of American Society of Anesthesiologists grades I to II
* Patients presenting with single-level disc disease and radiculopathy (L2-L3; L3-L4; L4-L5) for steroid injection
* Confirmation of herniated disk by CT or MRI
* Able to give informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
* Pregnant women
* Disease status of American Society of Anesthesiologists grades III to IV
* Unable to provide an informed consent
* Radiculopathies at multiple spinal levels
* Non-lumbar herniated discs
* Clinically obvious or known spinal deformity or stenosis
* Previous spine surgery
* Local or systemic infection
* Allergy to steroids, anesthetics, or contrast material
* Uncorrectable coagulopathy and patients on anticoagulation therapy
* Patients who refuse the procedure
* Spine tuberculosis or tumors
* Prior injections within 3 months
18 Years
64 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Quantel Medical
INDUSTRY
American University of Beirut Medical Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Marwan Rizk
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Marwan Rizk, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
American University of Beirut Medical Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
American University of Beirut Medical Center
Beirut, , Lebanon
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Marwan Rizk, MD
Role: primary
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Manchikanti L. Transforaminal lumbar epidural steroid injections. Pain Physician. 2000 Oct;3(4):374-98.
Wu A, March L, Zheng X, Huang J, Wang X, Zhao J, Blyth FM, Smith E, Buchbinder R, Hoy D. Global low back pain prevalence and years lived with disability from 1990 to 2017: estimates from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Ann Transl Med. 2020 Mar;8(6):299. doi: 10.21037/atm.2020.02.175.
Mehta N, Salaria M, Salaria AQ. Comparison of fluoroscopic Guided Transforaminal Epidural Injections of Steroid and Local Anaesthetic with Conservative Management in Patients with Chronic Lumbar Radiculopathies. Anesth Essays Res. 2017 Jan-Mar;11(1):17-22. doi: 10.4103/0259-1162.186868.
Hashemi M, Dadkhah P, Taheri M, Haji Seyed Abootorabi SM, Naderi-Nabi B. Ultrasound-Guided Lumbar Transforaminal Epidural Injections; A Single Center Fluoroscopic Validation Study. Bull Emerg Trauma. 2019 Jul;7(3):251-255. doi: 10.29252/beat-070307.
Jee H, Lee JH, Kim J, Park KD, Lee WY, Park Y. Ultrasound-guided selective nerve root block versus fluoroscopy-guided transforaminal block for the treatment of radicular pain in the lower cervical spine: a randomized, blinded, controlled study. Skeletal Radiol. 2013 Jan;42(1):69-78. doi: 10.1007/s00256-012-1434-1. Epub 2012 May 20.
Engel A, King W, MacVicar J; Standards Division of the International Spine Intervention Society. The effectiveness and risks of fluoroscopically guided cervical transforaminal injections of steroids: a systematic review with comprehensive analysis of the published data. Pain Med. 2014 Mar;15(3):386-402. doi: 10.1111/pme.12304. Epub 2013 Dec 5.
Yang G, Liu J, Ma L, Cai Z, Meng C, Qi S, Zhou H. Ultrasound-guided Versus Fluoroscopy-controlled Lumbar Transforaminal Epidural Injections: A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial. Clin J Pain. 2016 Feb;32(2):103-8. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000237.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
BIO-2022-0218
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.