Two Different Approaches During Fluoroscopically Guided Interlaminar Lumbar Epidural Steroid Injection

NCT ID: NCT01760317

Last Updated: 2015-02-05

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

106 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-08-31

Study Completion Date

2013-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to compare two different approaches (midline and parasagittal) during interlaminar lumbar epidural steroid injection (LESI), and to verify the role of concordant pressure paresthesia occurring during the LESI in determining outcome.

The investigators are planning to include 100 patients, undergoing LESI for radicular low back pain. This will be single-blinded randomized study. Every patient will receive the same medication we would use regardless of participating in the study. The patients will be randomly assigned to one of two groups, based on the approach:

* Group I (50 patients) - will get LESI using midline (MIL) approach.
* Group II (50 patients) - will get LESI using parasagittal interlaminar (PIL) approach.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Unilateral Lumbosacral Radiculopathy Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Midline

Midline Lumbar Epidural Steroid Injection

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Midline vs Parasagittal Lumbar Epidural Steroid Injection

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Parasagittal

Parasagittal Lumbar Epidural Steroid Injection

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Midline vs Parasagittal Lumbar Epidural Steroid Injection

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Midline vs Parasagittal Lumbar Epidural Steroid Injection

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* 18- 80 years old
* History of low back pain and unilateral lumbosacral radiculopathy pain
* Lumbar disk disease including disk herniations, bulging discs, and degenerated discs, where at least 50% of the disk height is preserved respective to contiguous levels

Exclusion Criteria

* Discogenic pain without radiculopathy pain
* History of previous spinal surgery
* LESI(s) in the past year
* Allergy to methylprednisolone, or lidocaine, or iodine-based contrast
* Concurrent use of systemic steroid medications
* Opioid habituation
* Pregnancy
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Kenneth D Candido

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Kenneth D Candido

Chairman of Anesthesia Department; Advocate Illinois Masonic Medical Center

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Chicago Anesthesia Pain Specialits

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Boswell MV, Shah RV, Everett CR, Sehgal N, McKenzie Brown AM, Abdi S, Bowman RC 2nd, Deer TR, Datta S, Colson JD, Spillane WF, Smith HS, Lucas LF, Burton AW, Chopra P, Staats PS, Wasserman RA, Manchikanti L. Interventional techniques in the management of chronic spinal pain: evidence-based practice guidelines. Pain Physician. 2005 Jan;8(1):1-47.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16850041 (View on PubMed)

Abdi S, Datta S, Trescot AM, Schultz DM, Adlaka R, Atluri SL, Smith HS, Manchikanti L. Epidural steroids in the management of chronic spinal pain: a systematic review. Pain Physician. 2007 Jan;10(1):185-212.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17256030 (View on PubMed)

Manchikanti L. The growth of interventional pain management in the new millennium: a critical analysis of utilization in the medicare population. Pain Physician. 2004 Oct;7(4):465-82.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16858489 (View on PubMed)

Boswell MV, Trescot AM, Datta S, Schultz DM, Hansen HC, Abdi S, Sehgal N, Shah RV, Singh V, Benyamin RM, Patel VB, Buenaventura RM, Colson JD, Cordner HJ, Epter RS, Jasper JF, Dunbar EE, Atluri SL, Bowman RC, Deer TR, Swicegood JR, Staats PS, Smith HS, Burton AW, Kloth DS, Giordano J, Manchikanti L; American Society of Interventional Pain Physicians. Interventional techniques: evidence-based practice guidelines in the management of chronic spinal pain. Pain Physician. 2007 Jan;10(1):7-111.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17256025 (View on PubMed)

Buenaventura RM, Datta S, Abdi S, Smith HS. Systematic review of therapeutic lumbar transforaminal epidural steroid injections. Pain Physician. 2009 Jan-Feb;12(1):233-51.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19165306 (View on PubMed)

Candido KD, Raghavendra MS, Chinthagada M, Badiee S, Trepashko DW. A prospective evaluation of iodinated contrast flow patterns with fluoroscopically guided lumbar epidural steroid injections: the lateral parasagittal interlaminar epidural approach versus the transforaminal epidural approach. Anesth Analg. 2008 Feb;106(2):638-44, table of contents. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e3181605e9b.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18227326 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Advocate-IRB-4917

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

The MiDAS ENCORE Study
NCT02093520 COMPLETED NA