Erector Spinae Plane Block vs Transforaminal Epidural Injection
NCT ID: NCT04212845
Last Updated: 2020-01-07
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
60 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2020-01-02
2020-09-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Ultrasound-guided erector spina plan block (ESPB) was first described in 2016 and has been used for postoperative analgesia in many surgeries including thoracic and lumbar dermatomes. The distribution of local anesthesia in the ESPB from the paravertebral area to the transforaminal and epidural space has been shown in studies.
The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of ultrasound-guided ESPB and fluoroscopic guided transforaminal epidural steroid injection in chronic discogenic low back pain.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Efficacy of Transforaminal Epidural Steroid and Its Combination With Ozone in Lumbar Radiculopathy
NCT06503835
Erector Spinae Plan Block (ESPB) with Dexmedetomidine and Dexamethasone in Lumbar Spine Fusion
NCT06658054
Lumbar Transforaminal Anterior Epidural Steroid Injections in Discogenic Low Back Pain
NCT04930211
Lumbar Disc Hernia, Erector Spinae Plane Block, Ilesi
NCT07184554
Effect of Metabolic Syndrome on Outcomes of Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injection Treatment in Chronic Lumbar Radiculopathy
NCT05088954
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Group ESP
Ultrasound-Guided erector spinae plane block with 30 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine and 8 mg dexamethasone
Bupivacaine;Dexamethasone Solution for Injection
8 mg Dexamethasone and %0.25 bupivacaine
Ultrasound
Ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block
Group TF
Fluoroscopy-guided transforaminal injection with 4 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine and 8 mg dexamethasone
Bupivacaine;Dexamethasone Solution for Injection
8 mg Dexamethasone and %0.25 bupivacaine
Fluoroscopy
Fluoroscopy-guided transforaminal injection
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Bupivacaine;Dexamethasone Solution for Injection
8 mg Dexamethasone and %0.25 bupivacaine
Fluoroscopy
Fluoroscopy-guided transforaminal injection
Ultrasound
Ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients with unilateral radicular pain and low back pain persisting despite medical treatment.
Exclusion Criteria
* Previous low back surgery,
* More than two levels of lumbar disc hernia,
* Allergic to local anesthetic drugs to be used,
* Use of oral anticoagulants,
* Uncontrolled diabetes mellitus type I and II
18 Years
60 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Ataturk University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Ahmet Murat Yayik
Assistant Professor
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Ataturk University
Erzurum, , Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Celik M, Tulgar S, Ahiskalioglu A, Alper F. Is high volume lumbar erector spinae plane block an alternative to transforaminal epidural injection? Evaluation with MRI. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2019 Apr 16:rapm-2019-100514. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2019-100514. Online ahead of print. No abstract available.
Makkar JK, Gourav KKP, Jain K, Singh PM, Dhatt SS, Sachdeva N, Bhadada S. Transforaminal Versus Lateral Parasagittal Versus Midline Interlaminar Lumbar Epidural Steroid Injection for Management of Unilateral Radicular Lumbar Pain: A Randomized Double-Blind Trial. Pain Physician. 2019 Nov;22(6):561-573.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
ESPB vs TF
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.