Intravenous Dexamethasone and Dexmedetomidine on the Analgesic Efficacy of Erector Spinae Plane Block

NCT ID: NCT04767256

Last Updated: 2022-03-29

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

120 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-03-01

Study Completion Date

2021-12-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Patients having lumbar spinal fusion often complain about severe postoperative pain and postoperative rehabilitation process can be affected negatively. Postoperative pain that cannot be well controlled may lead to delayed mobilization, pulmonary and thromboembolic complications, prolonged hospital stays, and chronic pain syndromes. Pain after spinal surgery can arise from several different tissues, such as the vertebrae, disks, ligaments, dura, facet joint, muscle, fascia, and subcutaneous and cutaneous tissues.

Ultrasound-guided lumbar erector spinae plane block (ESPB) has been shown to reduce postoperative pain in patients undergoing posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF). However, the duration of analgesia after single-shot ESPB with commonly used local anesthetics is reported to be no more than 12 h, which often not long enough to provide satisfactory postoperative pain relief, as the pain typically lasts for several days. Compared with perineural route, intravenous additives to local anesthetics are commonly accepted as its safety and efficiency have been reported. Moreover, co-administration of intravenous dexamethasone and dexmedetomidine significantly prolonged the time to first rescue analgesic request after single-shot interscalene brachial plexus block. However, more data are needed especially for lumbar ESPB.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Dexamethasone Dexmedetomidine Nerve Block

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

DD group

co-administered intravenous dexamethasone 10 mg and dexmedetomidine 1 ug/kg

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Dexamethasone and dexmedetomidine

Intervention Type DRUG

General anesthesia was induced with sufentanil 0.5-0.8 ug/kg, propofol 1.5-2.0 mg/kg, and rocuronium 0.5-1.0 mg/kg. Intravenous dexamethasone 10 mg was injected and a 50-ml syringe containing dexmedetomidine 1 ug/kg in 0.9% saline was infused after induction of general anaesthesia over a 30-min period. Anesthesia was maintained by remifentanil and sevoflurane to keep the Narcotrend index reading between 40 and 60.

Ultrasound-guided lumbar erector spinae plane block

Intervention Type OTHER

The probe was installed in the sagittal axis in the midline at the L3 vertebral level. The spinous processes were first visualized, after which the probe was lateralized, and the transverse processes and the erector spinae muscle were visualized approximately 3 cm laterally to the midline. The needle was advanced between the transverse process and the deep fascia of the erector spinae muscle from the caudal to the cranial using in-plane technique. The location of the needle was confirmed with 2mL saline solution, after which 20 mL of 0.4% ropivacaine was administered.

PCIA

Intervention Type OTHER

Intravenous PCA included 0.9% saline with sufentanil and was programmed to run at 2ml with a 1-ml bolus dose and a 10-min lockout time. The patients with VAS more than 4 despite using intravenous PCA were treated with rescue analgesics comprising intravenous parecoxib.

D group

intravenous dexmedetomidine 1 ug/kg

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Dexmedetomidine

Intervention Type DRUG

Intravenous dexmedetomidine 1 ug/kg was infused after induction of general anaesthesia over a 30-min period.

Ultrasound-guided lumbar erector spinae plane block

Intervention Type OTHER

The probe was installed in the sagittal axis in the midline at the L3 vertebral level. The spinous processes were first visualized, after which the probe was lateralized, and the transverse processes and the erector spinae muscle were visualized approximately 3 cm laterally to the midline. The needle was advanced between the transverse process and the deep fascia of the erector spinae muscle from the caudal to the cranial using in-plane technique. The location of the needle was confirmed with 2mL saline solution, after which 20 mL of 0.4% ropivacaine was administered.

PCIA

Intervention Type OTHER

Intravenous PCA included 0.9% saline with sufentanil and was programmed to run at 2ml with a 1-ml bolus dose and a 10-min lockout time. The patients with VAS more than 4 despite using intravenous PCA were treated with rescue analgesics comprising intravenous parecoxib.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Dexamethasone and dexmedetomidine

General anesthesia was induced with sufentanil 0.5-0.8 ug/kg, propofol 1.5-2.0 mg/kg, and rocuronium 0.5-1.0 mg/kg. Intravenous dexamethasone 10 mg was injected and a 50-ml syringe containing dexmedetomidine 1 ug/kg in 0.9% saline was infused after induction of general anaesthesia over a 30-min period. Anesthesia was maintained by remifentanil and sevoflurane to keep the Narcotrend index reading between 40 and 60.

Intervention Type DRUG

Dexmedetomidine

Intravenous dexmedetomidine 1 ug/kg was infused after induction of general anaesthesia over a 30-min period.

Intervention Type DRUG

Ultrasound-guided lumbar erector spinae plane block

The probe was installed in the sagittal axis in the midline at the L3 vertebral level. The spinous processes were first visualized, after which the probe was lateralized, and the transverse processes and the erector spinae muscle were visualized approximately 3 cm laterally to the midline. The needle was advanced between the transverse process and the deep fascia of the erector spinae muscle from the caudal to the cranial using in-plane technique. The location of the needle was confirmed with 2mL saline solution, after which 20 mL of 0.4% ropivacaine was administered.

Intervention Type OTHER

PCIA

Intravenous PCA included 0.9% saline with sufentanil and was programmed to run at 2ml with a 1-ml bolus dose and a 10-min lockout time. The patients with VAS more than 4 despite using intravenous PCA were treated with rescue analgesics comprising intravenous parecoxib.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Age 18-65 yrs
2. American Society of Anesthesiologists physical statusⅠ-Ⅲ
3. Involvement of ≤3 spinal levels
4. Undergo elective posterior lumbar interbody fusion
5. Informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

1. A known allergy to the drugs being used
2. Pre-existing neuropsychiatric disorders or language barrier
3. Analgesics intake, history of substance abuse
4. Contraindications to peripheral nerve block
5. Acute cerebrovascular disease
6. Severe liver failure
7. Uncontrolled low blood pressure
8. Sinus bradycardia or atrioventricular block
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Huazhong University of Science and Technology

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Xi Wu

Principal Investigator, Department of Anesthesiology, Union Hospital of Tongji Medical College

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Union Hospital

Wuhan, Hubei, China

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

XH20210202

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Spinal Fusions Steroid Study
NCT05287035 UNKNOWN EARLY_PHASE1
Sterile Amniotic Fluid Filtrate Epidural Injection.
NCT04537026 COMPLETED PHASE1/PHASE2