Intravenous Dexamethasone and Dexmedetomidine on the Analgesic Efficacy of Erector Spinae Plane Block
NCT ID: NCT04767256
Last Updated: 2022-03-29
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
120 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-03-01
2021-12-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Ultrasound-guided lumbar erector spinae plane block (ESPB) has been shown to reduce postoperative pain in patients undergoing posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF). However, the duration of analgesia after single-shot ESPB with commonly used local anesthetics is reported to be no more than 12 h, which often not long enough to provide satisfactory postoperative pain relief, as the pain typically lasts for several days. Compared with perineural route, intravenous additives to local anesthetics are commonly accepted as its safety and efficiency have been reported. Moreover, co-administration of intravenous dexamethasone and dexmedetomidine significantly prolonged the time to first rescue analgesic request after single-shot interscalene brachial plexus block. However, more data are needed especially for lumbar ESPB.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Dexamethasone vs. Dexmedetomidine for ESPB in Pain Management After Spine Surgery
NCT06233617
Erector Spinae Plan Block (ESPB) with Dexmedetomidine and Dexamethasone in Lumbar Spine Fusion
NCT06658054
Dexamethasone Vs. Dexmedetomidine for ESPB in Pain Management After Pediatric Idiopathic Scoliosis Surgery
NCT06086431
Pilot Study on the Effect of Dexmedetomidine on Inflammatory Responses in Patients Undergoing Lumbar Spinal Fusion
NCT01377623
Intraoperative Infusion of Precedex to Reduce Length of Stay After Lumbar Spine Fusion
NCT00808665
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
DD group
co-administered intravenous dexamethasone 10 mg and dexmedetomidine 1 ug/kg
Dexamethasone and dexmedetomidine
General anesthesia was induced with sufentanil 0.5-0.8 ug/kg, propofol 1.5-2.0 mg/kg, and rocuronium 0.5-1.0 mg/kg. Intravenous dexamethasone 10 mg was injected and a 50-ml syringe containing dexmedetomidine 1 ug/kg in 0.9% saline was infused after induction of general anaesthesia over a 30-min period. Anesthesia was maintained by remifentanil and sevoflurane to keep the Narcotrend index reading between 40 and 60.
Ultrasound-guided lumbar erector spinae plane block
The probe was installed in the sagittal axis in the midline at the L3 vertebral level. The spinous processes were first visualized, after which the probe was lateralized, and the transverse processes and the erector spinae muscle were visualized approximately 3 cm laterally to the midline. The needle was advanced between the transverse process and the deep fascia of the erector spinae muscle from the caudal to the cranial using in-plane technique. The location of the needle was confirmed with 2mL saline solution, after which 20 mL of 0.4% ropivacaine was administered.
PCIA
Intravenous PCA included 0.9% saline with sufentanil and was programmed to run at 2ml with a 1-ml bolus dose and a 10-min lockout time. The patients with VAS more than 4 despite using intravenous PCA were treated with rescue analgesics comprising intravenous parecoxib.
D group
intravenous dexmedetomidine 1 ug/kg
Dexmedetomidine
Intravenous dexmedetomidine 1 ug/kg was infused after induction of general anaesthesia over a 30-min period.
Ultrasound-guided lumbar erector spinae plane block
The probe was installed in the sagittal axis in the midline at the L3 vertebral level. The spinous processes were first visualized, after which the probe was lateralized, and the transverse processes and the erector spinae muscle were visualized approximately 3 cm laterally to the midline. The needle was advanced between the transverse process and the deep fascia of the erector spinae muscle from the caudal to the cranial using in-plane technique. The location of the needle was confirmed with 2mL saline solution, after which 20 mL of 0.4% ropivacaine was administered.
PCIA
Intravenous PCA included 0.9% saline with sufentanil and was programmed to run at 2ml with a 1-ml bolus dose and a 10-min lockout time. The patients with VAS more than 4 despite using intravenous PCA were treated with rescue analgesics comprising intravenous parecoxib.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Dexamethasone and dexmedetomidine
General anesthesia was induced with sufentanil 0.5-0.8 ug/kg, propofol 1.5-2.0 mg/kg, and rocuronium 0.5-1.0 mg/kg. Intravenous dexamethasone 10 mg was injected and a 50-ml syringe containing dexmedetomidine 1 ug/kg in 0.9% saline was infused after induction of general anaesthesia over a 30-min period. Anesthesia was maintained by remifentanil and sevoflurane to keep the Narcotrend index reading between 40 and 60.
Dexmedetomidine
Intravenous dexmedetomidine 1 ug/kg was infused after induction of general anaesthesia over a 30-min period.
Ultrasound-guided lumbar erector spinae plane block
The probe was installed in the sagittal axis in the midline at the L3 vertebral level. The spinous processes were first visualized, after which the probe was lateralized, and the transverse processes and the erector spinae muscle were visualized approximately 3 cm laterally to the midline. The needle was advanced between the transverse process and the deep fascia of the erector spinae muscle from the caudal to the cranial using in-plane technique. The location of the needle was confirmed with 2mL saline solution, after which 20 mL of 0.4% ropivacaine was administered.
PCIA
Intravenous PCA included 0.9% saline with sufentanil and was programmed to run at 2ml with a 1-ml bolus dose and a 10-min lockout time. The patients with VAS more than 4 despite using intravenous PCA were treated with rescue analgesics comprising intravenous parecoxib.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. American Society of Anesthesiologists physical statusⅠ-Ⅲ
3. Involvement of ≤3 spinal levels
4. Undergo elective posterior lumbar interbody fusion
5. Informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
2. Pre-existing neuropsychiatric disorders or language barrier
3. Analgesics intake, history of substance abuse
4. Contraindications to peripheral nerve block
5. Acute cerebrovascular disease
6. Severe liver failure
7. Uncontrolled low blood pressure
8. Sinus bradycardia or atrioventricular block
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Huazhong University of Science and Technology
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Xi Wu
Principal Investigator, Department of Anesthesiology, Union Hospital of Tongji Medical College
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Union Hospital
Wuhan, Hubei, China
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
XH20210202
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.