Mechanical Diagnosis and Treatment and/or Steroid Injections for Lumbar Radiculopathy

NCT ID: NCT02951377

Last Updated: 2022-04-11

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

PHASE1

Total Enrollment

27 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-10-01

Study Completion Date

2020-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Aim 1: The primary aim of this study is to test the feasibility of Mechanical Diagnosis and Treatment (MDT) +/- transforaminal epidural steroid injections (TESI) on pain and disability in patients awaiting physiatry consult for lumbar radiculopathy secondary to lumbar disc herniation, compared to usual care within the current healthcare system in Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

Hypothesis: the investigators hypothesise that centralisers treated with MDT and non-centralisers receiving TESIs + MDT will have demonstrate reductions in self-reported pain and disability, compared to usual care controls.

Aim 2: the investigators will also describe the potential impact on healthcare resources by tracking surgical rates and self-reported healthcare utilisation during the study period.

Hypothesis: based on predicted reductions in pain and disability, the investigators hypothesise that there will be a trend toward overall less healthcare utilisation (including surgery) in the MDT guided group compared to the surgical wait list group.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Study Purpose and Specific Objectives: This pilot study aims to determine the feasibility of conducting a definitive clinical trial of MDT +/- TESI in patients awaiting physiatry consult for lumbar radiculopathy secondary to lumbar disc herniation compared to usual care.

Research Design and Methodology:

Design and participants: Randomised clinical trial pilot study. Eligible candidates will be identified by Physiatrists at a Physiatry clinic in Calgary. The investigators will recruit 30 patients (15 per group). Fifteen - twenty subjects per group provide reasonable bias-corrected estimates for medium effects. Inclusion criteria: Leg dominant pain secondary to lumbar disc protrusion confirmed on MRI with duration \> 3 months, at least one neurological sign and able to speak English and provide written informed consent. Exclusion criteria: pregnancy and specific causes of low back pain (LBP) not directly related to herniated discs, progressive neurological signs and/or cauda equine syndrome, or contraindication for the use of corticosteroids or fluoroscopy. Consecutive patients will randomised into either the intervention described below to enable an estimation of the magnitude of the treatment effect or the usual care will be followed to estimate the magnitude of effect for the control group.

Interventions: Group 1- Control group: Outcome assessments will be conducted on patients on the wait list for physiatry consultation at baseline, 6 weeks, and 3 months. Group 2 - Intervention group (MDT group): Consistent with the MDT approach, patients will be initially assessed for centralisation over 2 visits by a Credentialed MDT therapist and further classified into centraliser (group 2a) and non-centralising pain responses (group 2b). A centralising pain response is defined as those whose most distal pain is reduced and retreats toward mid-line (e.g., pain now above knee) in response to certain postures and repeated end-range movement testing. Group 2a, Centralisers: Patients with a centralising pain response will continue with treatment based on MDT principles and will complete an exercise diary to indicate the frequency in which the exercises were performed daily. Group 2b, Non-centralisers: Patients with a non-centralising pain response will be offered TESIs followed by MDT. TESIs of 20mg dexamethasone and 0.5cc lidocaine 2%, under fluoroscopic guidance with contrast medium (Omni Pac 240) as described by the Spine Intervention Society (SIS) guidelines will be provided. Segment level will be determined based on MRI findings in combination with the clinical examination findings.

Two weeks after completion of the MDT or TESI intervention, patients will be reassessed and treated in a manner consistent with their presenting pain response classification: 1) resolved: advice on remaining active; 2) centralising: treated according to MDT principles with direction specific exercises and postural advise; 3) non-centralising but significant less pain: advice to remain active, with respect for worsening leg pain; and 4) persisting high levels of pain and/or disability: advise to remain active as tolerated and consult family physicians. Those who continue to perform MDT exercises will complete an exercise diary to indicate the frequency in which the exercises were performed daily

Outcome assessments: Assessing and treating therapists are credentialed in MDT and will be blinded to outcomes. The following outcomes will be assessed in all groups at baseline, 6 weeks, and 3 months. The primary outcome measures will be the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) adapted and validated for sciatica, leg pain intensity, and global perceived effect (GPE). Average leg pain intensity will be measured using a numeric rating scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain) over the past 24 hours. GPE will be measured using a 7 point Likert scale, with lower scores suggesting recovery and higher scores suggesting worsening. Secondary outcome measures will include fear avoidance (FABQ), general health (SF-12), and medication use. Demographics will also be collected. In addition, participants who are prescribed exercises will complete a diary indicating the frequency at which the exercises were performed.

Data analysis: Leg pain intensity at 3 months, measured using a 10 point numeric rating scale (NRS) will be the primary outcome for which the larger more definitive study will be planned. An independent t-test will be used to estimate the effect sizes of the intervention group compared to the control group. Independent t-tests will also be applied to the other outcome measures for exploratory purposes. Statistical significance will be set at α=0.05. Descriptive statistics will be calculated.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Sciatica Lumbosacral Radiculopathy Lumbar Disc Rupture

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Control

Wait list control - usual care - free to pursue other treatments prescribed by the patients family physician

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

MDT +/- TESI

Exercise (MDT approach) and/or Transforaminal epidural steroid injection (20mg dexamethasone 0.5cc lidocaine 2%). Patients will further classified into centraliser (group 2a) and non-centralising pain responses (group 2b). Group 2a: will continue with exercise (MDT approach). Group 2b: Patients with a non-centralising pain response will be offered Transforaminal epidural steroid injection (20mg dexamethasone 0.5cc lidocaine 2%), under fluoroscopic guidance with contrast medium (Omni Pac 240). Two weeks after completion of the MDT or TESI intervention, patients will be reassessed and treated consistent with their response: 1) resolved: advice on remaining active; 2) centralising: daily exercises based on MDT principles; 3) non-centralising but significant less pain: advice to remain active, with respect for worsening leg pain; and 4) persisting high levels of pain and/or disability: advise to remain active as tolerated and consult family physician.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Exercise (MDT approach)

Intervention Type OTHER

Postural or movement exercises of the lower back that aim to centralise and reduce pain intensity.

Transforaminal epidural steroid injection (20mg dexamethasone 0.5cc lidocaine 2%)

Intervention Type DRUG

An epidural steroid injection (20mg dexamethasone 0.5cc lidocaine 2%), under guidance of fluoroscopy is used to reduce inflammation at a lumbar spinal nerve root(s).

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Exercise (MDT approach)

Postural or movement exercises of the lower back that aim to centralise and reduce pain intensity.

Intervention Type OTHER

Transforaminal epidural steroid injection (20mg dexamethasone 0.5cc lidocaine 2%)

An epidural steroid injection (20mg dexamethasone 0.5cc lidocaine 2%), under guidance of fluoroscopy is used to reduce inflammation at a lumbar spinal nerve root(s).

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* leg dominant pain secondary to lumbar disc protrusion confirmed on MRI with duration \> 3 months, at least one neurological sign and able to speak English and provide written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria

* Pregnancy and specific causes of LBP not directly related to herniated discs, progressive neurological signs and/or cauda equine syndrome, or contraindication for the use of corticosteroids or fluoroscopy. These features primarily represent patients who are not suitable for the interventions offered in the study.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Calgary

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Alberta College and Association of Phyiotherapists

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Alberta

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Buenavista Physiotherapy

Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

RES0032934

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.