A Dose Escalation Study of a Combination Antihypertensive Drug in the Treatment of Various Groups of Patients Who do Not Respond to Single Drug Treatment of Their High Blood Pressure

NCT ID: NCT00791258

Last Updated: 2019-01-09

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

999 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2008-11-30

Study Completion Date

2009-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The initial 12 week portion of this 20 week study will examine the ability of a combination of olmesartan medoxomil and amlodipine to lower the blood pressure of patients with high blood pressure who have not had sufficient blood pressure reduction using one anti-hypertension drug (monotherapy). The final 8 weeks of this 20 week study will examine the ability of a combination of olmesartan medoxomil, amlodipine and hydrochlorothiazide to lower blood pressure in the same patient population. All three medications being tested have been approved by the FDA for the treatment of high blood pressure, but only amlodipine and olmesartan are currently approved for use in combination form.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hypertension

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

1

Azor tablets and hydrochlorothiazide tablets (if necessary) will be administered for up to 20 weeks

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

amlodipine and olmesartan medoxomil tablets

Intervention Type DRUG

amlodipine and olmesartan medoxomil tablets administered orally, once daily for up to 20 weeks

hydrochlorothiazide tablets

Intervention Type DRUG

hydrochlorothiazide tablets may be administered orally, if necessary once daily, for up to 8 weeks

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

amlodipine and olmesartan medoxomil tablets

amlodipine and olmesartan medoxomil tablets administered orally, once daily for up to 20 weeks

Intervention Type DRUG

hydrochlorothiazide tablets

hydrochlorothiazide tablets may be administered orally, if necessary once daily, for up to 8 weeks

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

AZOR Tablets

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* \>= to 18 years of age
* Hypertension uncontrolled on current monotherapy
* Females:
* negative serum pregnancy test at screening
* post menopausal or have had a hysterectomy or tubal ligation or practicing approved methods of birth control

Exclusion Criteria

* Pregnant females
* Uncontrolled hypertension with multiple drugs, except for hydrochlorothiazide/triamterene
* Diabetes requiring insulin
* Serious disorders that may limit the ability to evaluate the efficacy or safety of treatment
* History of myocardial infarction, bypass graft, angioplasty or heart failure within the past 6 months
* History of Class III or IV congestive heart failure
* History of stroke or transient ischemic attack within the last 1 year
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Integrium

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Daiichi Sankyo

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Daiichi Sankyo

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Green Valley, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Mesa, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Sierra Vista, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Tempe, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Tucson, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Anaheim, California, United States

Site Status

Harbor City, California, United States

Site Status

National City, California, United States

Site Status

Tustin, California, United States

Site Status

Westlake Village, California, United States

Site Status

Colorado Springs, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Pueblo, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Milford, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Boynton Beach, Florida, United States

Site Status

Brooksville, Florida, United States

Site Status

Clearwater, Florida, United States

Site Status

Deerfield Beach, Florida, United States

Site Status

DeLand, Florida, United States

Site Status

Fort Lauderdale, Florida, United States

Site Status

Kissimmee, Florida, United States

Site Status

Pembroke Pines, Florida, United States

Site Status

Sarasota, Florida, United States

Site Status

St. Petersburg, Florida, United States

Site Status

Tampa, Florida, United States

Site Status

Boise, Idaho, United States

Site Status

Addison, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Orland Park, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Wichita, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Lexington, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Columbia, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Elkridge, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Oxon Hill, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Reisterstown, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Stevensville, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Omaha, Nebraska, United States

Site Status

Las Vegas, Nevada, United States

Site Status

Edison, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Sewell, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States

Site Status

Binghamton, New York, United States

Site Status

Cary, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Charlotte, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Harrisburg, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Hickory, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

High Point, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Raleigh, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Wilmington, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Norman, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Tulsa, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Eugene, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Portland, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Havertown, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Jenkintown, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Greenville, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Mt. Pleasant, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

New Tazewell, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Amarillo, Texas, United States

Site Status

Austin, Texas, United States

Site Status

Carrollton, Texas, United States

Site Status

Corpus Christi, Texas, United States

Site Status

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Longview, Texas, United States

Site Status

West Jordan, Utah, United States

Site Status

Norfolk, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Walla Walla, Washington, United States

Site Status

Madison, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Nesbitt SD, Shojaee A, Maa JF, Weir MR. Efficacy of an amlodipine/olmesartan treatment algorithm in patients with or without type 2 diabetes and hypertension (a secondary analysis of the BP-CRUSH study). J Hum Hypertens. 2013 Jul;27(7):445-52. doi: 10.1038/jhh.2012.65. Epub 2012 Dec 20.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 23254596 (View on PubMed)

Hsueh WA, Shojaee A, Maa JF, Neutel JM. Efficacy of amlodipine/olmesartan medoxomil +/- HCTZ in obese patients uncontrolled on antihypertensive monotherapy. Curr Med Res Opin. 2012 Nov;28(11):1809-18. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2012.740632. Epub 2012 Oct 30.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 23072496 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CS8663-404

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.