Procedural Sedation Using Propofol Versus Midazolam/Ketamine in the Adult Emergency Department

NCT ID: NCT00784498

Last Updated: 2010-08-03

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2008-11-30

Study Completion Date

2009-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The use of procedural sedation and analgesia (PSA) to accomplish painful procedures in the emergency department (ED) has become a standard of practice over the last decade. Substantial variance exists regarding usage of medication for PSA, and many anesthetic agents have been proposed for this use.

To our knowledge no head to head study compared the clinical effectiveness, safety profile and amnestic properties of midazolam/ketamine vs. propofol regimens for PSA in the adult ED setting.

This prospective randomized trail can will help to evaluate the effectiveness and safety profile of Midazolam/katamine regimen for ED PSA in adults and will contribute to the discussion regarding propofol roll in the ED.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Procedural Sedation

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

midazolam/ketamine

Patients with orthopedic injuries requiring painful manipulation

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Ketamine/Midazolam

Intervention Type DRUG

Intravenous bolus of midazolam 0.1mg/kg in titrated dose of 1 mg/min until spontaneous eye closure or up to 5mg (whichever comes first) followed by ketamine 0.5-1mg/kg (up to 100mg) in titrated dose of 10mg/30 seconds, to achieve the desired level of sedation

propofol

Patients with orthopedic injuries requiring painful manipulation

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Propofol

Intervention Type DRUG

Intravenous bolus of propofol 0.5-1mg/kg in titrated dose of 10mg/30seconds (up to 100mg) to achieve the desired level of sedation

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Ketamine/Midazolam

Intravenous bolus of midazolam 0.1mg/kg in titrated dose of 1 mg/min until spontaneous eye closure or up to 5mg (whichever comes first) followed by ketamine 0.5-1mg/kg (up to 100mg) in titrated dose of 10mg/30 seconds, to achieve the desired level of sedation

Intervention Type DRUG

Propofol

Intravenous bolus of propofol 0.5-1mg/kg in titrated dose of 10mg/30seconds (up to 100mg) to achieve the desired level of sedation

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients with orthopedic injuries requiring painful manipulation (i.e. reduction of fracture or dislocation, drainage of abscess, suture of extensive laceration)
* Age between18-65 years
* American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score of 1 or 2
* Systolic blood pressure higher than 90 mmHg and lower than 160 mmHg before initiating sedation
* Willingness and ability to provide an informed consent
* No known hypersensitivity to either medication
* No evidence of intoxication
* No recent heavy meal.

Exclusion Criteria

* Pregnant women and patients who do not meet the above criteria will be excluded.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Pinchas Halpern, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center

Tel Aviv, , Israel

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Israel

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

0272-08-TLV

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

Study Protocol [1] 2-Jul-08

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

TASMC-08-PH-0272-CTIL

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.