Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
60 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2013-08-31
2016-04-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparison of Dexmedetomidine and Propofol-Remifentanil Conscious Sedation for Awake Craniotomy for Tumor Surgery
NCT01545297
Propofol-remifentanyl Versus Dexmedetomidine in Awake Craniotomy: Impact on Electroclinical Seizure Activity
NCT05103735
Minimal Effective Concentration of Lidocaine in Propofol Lidocaine Mixture for Relief of Pain on Propofol Injection
NCT05165303
The Effects of Different Anesthetics on Functional Connectivity
NCT03343873
Epileptiform EEG Patterns During Induction of General Anaesthesia With Sevoflurane Compared to Those With Propofol
NCT03209323
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Patients were randomly allocated using computerized software into two groups, thirty patients in each group to receive intra-operative either propofol-dexmedetomidine (PD group) or propofol-remifentanil (PR group) intravenous infusion. All patients received their routine treatment for epilepsy at their scheduled time before surgery. All patients were fully monitored intra-operatively for heart rate, non-invasive blood pressure, oxygen saturation, respiratory rate, and bi-spectral index (BIS). Oxygen was supplied to all patients via nasal cannula peri-operatively.
Anaesthesia was achieved by regional scalp block and IV sedation. Regional blockade of the scalp was performed using bupivacaine 0.5% and 2% lidocaine with epinephrine 1/200.000. The branches of the cranial nerves blocked were supratrochlear, supraorbital, auriculotemporal, greater and lesser occipital, great auricular, zygomatic, and infraorbital nerves. Supplemental local anesthetic solution was used to infiltrate along the incision lines prior to skin incision. During craniotomy, a mixture of 0.25% bupivacaine and lidocaine1% without epinephrine was used to anesthetize the dura mater. The maximum dose of lidocaine used did not exceed 4.5 mg kg -1 and for bupivacaine 3 mg kg -1.
All patients received propofol 1% with a starting intravenous infusion dose of 250 μg kg-1 min-1 for 15 min and then basal infusion dose at 50 μg kg-1min-1. Sedation was achieved for group PD by a combination of propofol and dexmedetomidine with a starting infusion dose of 1ug kg-1 hr -1 for 15 min, and then titrated down to 0.2μ g kg-1 hr-1.
In PR group, IV sedation was achieved by a combination of propofol and remifentanil at an initial bolus dose of 0.5 μg.kg-1 over 60 seconds and then a basal infusion of 0.1μg kg-1 min1. Insufficient sedation in both groups was treated with boluses of 250 μg kg-1 propofol. The total amount of propofol used in both groups was recorded.
Sedation was assessed using Ramsay sedation score.6 Patient scored (1) if was anxious, agitated, or restless. Patient scored (2) if was cooperative, oriented and tranquil. Score 3 was for patients responded to command only. Score (4) for patients exhibited brisk respond to light glabellar tap or loud auditory stimulus. Score (5) for patients exhibited a sluggish response to light glabellar tap or loud auditory stimulus. Score (6) was for patients exhibited no response. Score (1) means inadequate sedation, score (2 to 4) means acceptable sedation, and score (5) or (6) means excessive sedation. Bi-spectral index (BIS) was connected to all patients and recorded every half an hour intra-operatively until the end surgery.
For intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring propofol infusion was stopped for 15 minutes to avoid interference.
Side effects such as respiratory depression (respiratory rate less than 8/min), nausea, vomiting, airway obstruction, oxygen desaturation (oxygen saturation less than 90 %), and hypotension or hypertension (20% decrease or increase from the base line) were recorded. In case of apnea, respiratory depression, oxygen desaturation, and airway obstruction or hypotension all infusions were stopped until normalization and then the infusion resumed at half the basal rate. Vomiting was treated with 4mg intravenous ondansetron and the total ondansetron consumption was recorded for both groups.
If intraoperative convulsions occurred at any time IV thiopental sodium was given at a dose 1-2 mg kg-1. General anaesthesia was given if indicated and the patient was removed from the study. The excluded patients were replaced according to the schedule of randomization to keep the number of the two groups. Indications for general anesthesia were failure of the regional block, marked patient irritability, severe airway obstruction required intubation, uncontrolled convulsions, and haemodynamic instability.
Patient's satisfaction was recorded using a score ranging from 0 not satisfied and 10 totally satisfied. Surgeon satisfaction regarding the operative conditions and the anesthetic technique was recorded as 0 very bad operative conditions, 1 moderate, and 2 good.
Statistical analysis Sample size calculation was calculated using graphed instant statistics version 3. Based on previous research, dexmedetomidine was expected to produce a decrease in the heart rate by about 10 beats /minute with a standard deviation of 10 and by choosing 5% level of significance and power of 90% the calculated sample size was 22 so that, the sample size used in the study was 30 patients to ensure reliable results.
Data were analyzed using SPSS 19 program. Student t-test was used for comparing data between the two groups. Chi square test was used to compare the incidence of side effects. P value of less than 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
OTHER
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Propofol-dexmedetomidine
Propofol-dexmedetomidine Bupivacaine; Lidocaine (local anaesthetics) Epinephrine (with local anaesthetics for skin infiltration)
Dexmedetomidine
Dexmedetomidine used for conscious sedation.
Propofol
Used for conscious sedation.
Bupivacaine
Local anaesthetics
Lidocaine
Local anaesthetic
Epinephrine
With local anaesthetic for skin infiltration.
Propofol-remifentanil
Propofol-remifentanil Bupivacaine; Lidocaine Epinephrine (with local anaesthetics for skin infiltration)
Remifentanil
Remifentanil used for conscious sedation.
Propofol
Used for conscious sedation.
Bupivacaine
Local anaesthetics
Lidocaine
Local anaesthetic
Epinephrine
With local anaesthetic for skin infiltration.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Remifentanil
Remifentanil used for conscious sedation.
Dexmedetomidine
Dexmedetomidine used for conscious sedation.
Propofol
Used for conscious sedation.
Bupivacaine
Local anaesthetics
Lidocaine
Local anaesthetic
Epinephrine
With local anaesthetic for skin infiltration.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
50 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Menoufia University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Dr Ezzeldin Ibrahim
Assistant Professor in anaesthesia, intensive care, and pain medicine
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
MenoufiaU2016
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.