Hemodynamics During Induction of General Anesthesia With High and Low Propofol Dose.

NCT ID: NCT03861364

Last Updated: 2020-06-17

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

68 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-09-03

Study Completion Date

2020-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The study objective is to examine if a high propofol dose is non-inferior to a low dose in respect to hemodynamic stability in healthy patients during induction of general anesthesia with propofol and remifentanil.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Typically, one or more adjuvant medications are administered to supplement induction of general anesthesia. When combining anesthetic drugs, the hypnotic effects are often synergistic. Propofol is associated with hypotension and bradycardia and used together with remifentanil or sedative agents it may give synergistic or additive sedative and hemodynamic effects.

Claeys (1988) and Fairfield (1991) examined the cardiovascular effects of propofol 2-2.5 mg/kg induction dose and found significant reductions i SBP and SVR and small changes in CO, SV and HR. De Wit (2016) examined hemodynamic changes in different steady state propofol serum concentrations, and found a dose dependent SBP reduction, reduction in resistance of arterial and systemic circulation and a reduction in mean systemic filling pressures (MSFP) indicative of a reduction in "stressed volumes". The effective dose (ED) 95% for loss of consciousness for propofol was determined to 1.75 mg/kg when used alone, and 1.38 mg/kg when used together with remifentanil 0.25 microg/kg/min (total induction dose 1.75 microg/kg remifentanil) in a study by Koh et al. We want to examine the hemodynamic effects of giving a low (1.4 mg/kg) vs a high (2.4 mg/kg) propofol dose combined with a moderate remifentanil dose (about 1.5 microg/kg).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hemodynamics Instability Anesthesia, General Anesthesia, Intravenous

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Randomized, controlled, double blind.
Primary Study Purpose

BASIC_SCIENCE

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors
Randomization made by a person not involved in trial in other ways. Allocation masked in sealed envelopes, stored in a locked cash box only opened by two drug preparing nurses not involved in patient care. Syringe labelled with patient identification (ID) (eg 03Prop). Patient, Care Provider and Investigator blinded for actual concentration of drug. Allocation break after data data wash and processing.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

High Propofol

High Propofol induction dose

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Propofol

Intervention Type DRUG

2,4 mg/kg

Low Propofol

Low Propofol induction dose

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Propofol

Intervention Type DRUG

1,4 mg/kg

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Propofol

2,4 mg/kg

Intervention Type DRUG

Propofol

1,4 mg/kg

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Propolipid Propolipid

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Healthy women
* Age 18-50 years
* Gynecological procedures
* General anesthesia

Exclusion Criteria

* Pre-existing hypertension
* Diabetes for several years
* Ischemic heart disease
* Cerebrovascular disease
* Heart valve disease
* Verified cardiac arrhythmia
* Anaemia
* Kidney or hepatic disease
* Hypersensitivity for soya, eggs or peanuts
* Pregnancy
* Poor health state
* Illicit substance use
* BMI \<20 or \>35 kg/m2
* SBP \>150 mmHg
* HR \>100 beats/min
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

50 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Helse Fonna

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Gunnar Helge Sjøen

Overlege, anestesi

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Gunnar H Sjøen, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Helse Fonna

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Kirurgisk Klinikk-Anestesi

Haugesund, Rogaland, Norway

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Norway

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Koh JC, Park J, Kim NY, You AH, Ko SH, Han DW. Effects of remifentanil with or without midazolam pretreatment on the 95% effective dose of propofol for loss of consciousness during induction: A randomized, clinical trial. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Dec;96(49):e9164. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000009164.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29245361 (View on PubMed)

Claeys MA, Gepts E, Camu F. Haemodynamic changes during anaesthesia induced and maintained with propofol. Br J Anaesth. 1988 Jan;60(1):3-9. doi: 10.1093/bja/60.1.3.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 3257393 (View on PubMed)

Fairfield JE, Dritsas A, Beale RJ. Haemodynamic effects of propofol: induction with 2.5 mg kg-1. Br J Anaesth. 1991 Nov;67(5):618-20. doi: 10.1093/bja/67.5.618.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 1751277 (View on PubMed)

de Wit F, van Vliet AL, de Wilde RB, Jansen JR, Vuyk J, Aarts LP, de Jonge E, Veelo DP, Geerts BF. The effect of propofol on haemodynamics: cardiac output, venous return, mean systemic filling pressure, and vascular resistances. Br J Anaesth. 2016 Jun;116(6):784-9. doi: 10.1093/bja/aew126.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27199311 (View on PubMed)

Sjoen GH, Falk RS, Hauge TH, Tonnessen TI, Langesaeter E. Hemodynamic effects of a low versus a high dose of propofol during induction of anesthesia. A randomized trial. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2023 Oct;67(9):1178-1186. doi: 10.1111/aas.14293. Epub 2023 Jun 8.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 37291731 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2019-000958-56

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

2019/375

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.