Bone Geometry, Strength, and Biomechanical Changes in Runners With a History of Stress Fractures
NCT ID: NCT00766077
Last Updated: 2010-04-14
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
32 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2008-09-30
2009-02-28
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Competitive female distance runners will be recruited for this study. Participants will placed into a stress fracture or control group based on stress fracture history. Dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and peripheral Quantitative Computed Tomography (pQCT) will be used to assess bone structure and strength. Running mechanics will be assessed during a 30-40 minute fatiguing run. A treadmill with an embedded force plate and high speed video will be used to assess changes in running mechanics throughout the run.
The purpose of this project will be to
1. explore differences in volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD), bone geometry, and muscle cross sectional area (MCSA) using pQCT
2. explore changes in load (GRFs) and running mechanics that occur during a fatiguing run in runners with and without a history of stress fracture.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Bone Intake Proteins and Muscle Mass Deficiency in Proximal Femur Fractures
NCT05804604
Bone Strength and Physical Activity in Patients With a Recent Clinical Fracture
NCT05138640
Mode of Exercise and Bone Biomarkers in Older Veterans
NCT05266976
Effect of Two Exercise Programs on Bone Strength and Architecture
NCT02636530
How Does Early Age Life Style Affect Bone Strength and General Health Parameters at Middle Age?
NCT00270608
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Due to the prevalence of stress fractures in the military and athletic population, as well as the costly nature of the injury in terms of recovery time, it is important to understand the causative factors and the means by which these factors relate and interact (25, 29) . The most commonly studied and measured risk factors for stress fractures are surrogates of bone strength-particularly bone mineral density. Although several previous studies have explored the relationship of areal bone mineral density (aBMD, g/cm2) to stress fractures, the findings remain controversial (6, 7, 9, 12, 17, 28). A majority of these studies have used dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and aBMD as the assessment of bone strength. DXA is limited in its 2-dimensional assessment of a 3-dimensional bone and is also unable to distinguish between different types of bone(13, 30). Given the limitations of DXA imaging, measuring bone properties using peripheral Quantitative Computed Tomography (pQCT) may shed light on inconsistencies found in the current literature. Peripheral QCT is a 3-dimensional imaging technique that allows for measurement of both trabecular and cortical volumetric bone density, bone geometry (total area, cortical area), and estimates of bone mechanical strength (i.e. cross-sectional moment of inertia and section modulus) which better represent a bones mechanical competence (26, 31).
With any fracture, a bone will fail only if the load on the bone is higher than the strength of that bone. In the case of stress fractures, it has been suggested that those at risk for stress fracture may alter biomechanics with fatigue such that strain on bone is increased with fatigue causing an increase in microdamage and ultimate fracture. Research measuring kinetic and kinematic variables has shown changes in GRFs (10, 11, 16, 19, 21), strain magnitude, strain rate, strain distributions (8, 14, 15, 24), and landing strategies after the onset of muscle fatigue in healthy individuals. It has also been shown that when muscles are fatigued, their ability to absorb impact forces during landing, their internal timing ability between functioning muscle groups, and ability to counter bending moments is decreased (2-5, 18, 20, 23). It has been hypothesized that runners who are ineffective at altering movement kinematics experience greater increases in loading rates and impact magnitudes, making them more susceptible to injury than runners who are able to make appropriate alterations (16). However, the majority of these studies have been conducted during resting conditions and in athletes with no history of injury. No previous studies to our knowledge have adequately characterized the change in biomechanics during a fatiguing run in athletes with and without a history of stress fracture.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Athletes must currently be healthy, have been training for a minimum of 5 years and running 25 or more miles per week during their competitive season.
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
35 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Utah
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
University of Utah
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Laurie J Mileur, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Utah
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Utah
Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
29496
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.