Bone Microarchitecture in Women With and Without Fracture
NCT ID: NCT01049191
Last Updated: 2015-10-05
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
78 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2008-10-31
2010-05-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
This research will investigate 72 postmenopausal women with normal or osteopenic BMD by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA), 36 with prior low-trauma fractures will be compared with 36 age-, race- and BMD matched women without fracture. We hypothesize that 1.) Women with fractures will have evidence of microarchitectural deterioration on HR-MRI and 2.) Newly developed, more rapid MRI sequences designed at the UW will provide similar trabecular microstructure information more rapidly than the currently used, albeit investigational, technology produced by MicroMRI, Inc.
Our specific aims are to a) Evaluate differences in MicroMRI parameters of trabecular microstructure (bone volume fraction, trabecular thickness, surface/curve ratio and erosion index) between age-, race- and BMD-matched postmenopausal women with and without fracture; b.) Correlate T2\* relaxation time (a rapid indirect MRI measure of trabecular density and microstructure) with BMD measured by DXA, and microstructural parameters measured by MicroMRI. As an exploratory aim we will investigate HR-MRI parameters of trabecular microstructure obtained using a newly developed, rapid MRI sequence referred to as IDEAL-FSE with parameters obtained using the currently available MicroMRI, Inc. sequence.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Radiological Biological Genetic and Micro-architectural Bone Determinants of Fractures in Men With Low Bone Mineral Density
NCT01250314
Osteoporosis and Knee Insufficiency Fracture
NCT02332681
Psychological Determinants of the Therapeutic Observance of Osteoporotic Patients
NCT04029870
Osteoprosis in Type 2 Diabetic Patients- a Cohort Study
NCT01846533
Assessment of Cortical Bone Mechanics Technology (CBMT) Fracture Discrimination Capability
NCT05721898
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CROSS_SECTIONAL
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Fracture
Subjects experiencing a prior osteoporotic fracture.
No interventions assigned to this group
Control
These will be age and bone density matched controls to the fracture group.
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* normal BMD or osteopenia (T-score \> -2.5 at the L1-4 spine, proximal femur and 1/3rd radius) by DXA.
* sustained a "fragility" fracture of the spine, hip or wrist, defined as a fracture occurring with everyday activities including a fall from standing height or less.
* Historical radiographic documentation of fracture will be obtained.
* Criteria as defined above without prior fracture, age and bone density matching a participant in the fracture group
Exclusion Criteria
* malignancy
* renal failure
* use of medications which alter bone turnover
* diseases/conditions leading to the non-dominant arm disuse
* contraindications to MRI.
50 Years
FEMALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Wisconsin, Madison
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Richard Kijowski, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Wisconsin Department of Radiology
Neil C Binkley, MD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
University of Wisconsin Osteoporosis Clinical Research Center
Michael J Tuite, MD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
University of Wisconsin Department of Radiology
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Wisconsin Hospitals and Clinics
Madison, Wisconsin, United States
University of Wisconsin Osteoporosis Clinical and Research Program
Madison, Wisconsin, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2008-0177
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.