Clinical Outcomes of the Trinica(R) Anterior Lumbar Plate: Fixed Screws vs. Variable Screws

NCT ID: NCT00762723

Last Updated: 2014-04-17

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

19 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2008-02-29

Study Completion Date

2012-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Trinica Anterior Lumbar Plate (ALP) System is a commercially available, supplemental fusion device for use in the lumbar or sacral spine (L1-S1) to treat instability. The system provides the surgeon with the ability to supplement an interbody device with anterior plate fixation. The device's bone-plate interface is enhanced through use of fixed-angled screws,variable-angle screws or a combination of both to accommodate various combinations of screw configurations, resulting in enhanced fixation tailored to individual patient needs. Clinical outcomes data, including a comparison of different screw configurations, is needed to support the use and of the Trinica ALP System.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

In the cervical spine, literature shows that a static plate utilizing fixed screws loses its ability to load share and to limit motion following subsidence of the interbody spacer. In contrast, a dynamic plate system utilizing variable-angle screws maintains load-sharing and stiffness following subsidences. Increasing the load on the bone graft in the interbody space increases the rate of graft fusion. Although literature exists supporting the in vivo use of anterior cervical plate systems and the advantages of screw angulation, there is no data evaluating and supporting the use of anterior plate systems in the lumbar spine. The different biomechanical loads between cervical and lumbar spine suggest cervical data may not generalize to the lumbar spine. Additionally, it will be useful to characterize the effect of different screw configurations on subsidence and stress shielding and fusion success. The proposed study will not only assess clinical outcomes following Trinica ALP implantation, but will also provide valuable comparison data regarding two different screw configurations.

The study is a prospective, randomized, between groups design. The subject pool will be comprised of individuals who are appropriate for spinal fusion surgery, and who meet the inclusion criteria. Subjects will be randomly assigned to one of three screw configurations. All subjects will receive structural allograft (Puros A Anterior Allograft) as interbody support. Other procedures identified by the surgeon to be in the best interest of the patient may be completed but are not required by the protocol.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Degenerative Disc Disease Spinal Stenosis Spondylolisthesis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Group 1

Trinica Anterior Lumbar Plate System with fixed screws only

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Trinica Anterior Lumbar Plate System

Intervention Type DEVICE

Trinica Anterior Lumbar Plate System accommodates the use of either fixed- or variable-angle screws. This study is a comparison of clinical outcomes from anterior lumbar interbody fusion patients receiving the Trinica Anterior Lumbar Plate system with either all fixed-angle screws, variable-angle screws, or a hybrid configuration.

Group 2

Trinica Anterior Lumbar Plate System with variable screws only

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Trinica Anterior Lumbar Plate System

Intervention Type DEVICE

Trinica Anterior Lumbar Plate System accommodates the use of either fixed- or variable-angle screws. This study is a comparison of clinical outcomes from anterior lumbar interbody fusion patients receiving the Trinica Anterior Lumbar Plate system with either all fixed-angle screws, variable-angle screws, or a hybrid configuration.

Group 3

Trinica Anterior Lumbar Plate with hybrid screw configuration (2 fixed-angle screws with 2 variable-angle screws).

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Trinica Anterior Lumbar Plate System

Intervention Type DEVICE

Trinica Anterior Lumbar Plate System accommodates the use of either fixed- or variable-angle screws. This study is a comparison of clinical outcomes from anterior lumbar interbody fusion patients receiving the Trinica Anterior Lumbar Plate system with either all fixed-angle screws, variable-angle screws, or a hybrid configuration.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Trinica Anterior Lumbar Plate System

Trinica Anterior Lumbar Plate System accommodates the use of either fixed- or variable-angle screws. This study is a comparison of clinical outcomes from anterior lumbar interbody fusion patients receiving the Trinica Anterior Lumbar Plate system with either all fixed-angle screws, variable-angle screws, or a hybrid configuration.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Spinal stenosis
* Spondylolisthesis Degenerative disc disease (defined as back pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies)
* Fracture (including dislocation or subluxation)
* Spine tumor
* Scoliosis
* Lordotic deformities of the spine

Exclusion Criteria

* An active systemic or local infection
* Previous fusion attempt at index level
* A local inflammation with or without fever or leukocytosis
* Pregnancy
* Obesity (BMI \>40 kg/m2)
* Drug or alcohol abuse
* Uncooperativeness or neurological or mental illness rendering the individual unwilling or unable to follow instructions
* Inability to restrict high activity level
* A suspected or documented metal allergy or intolerance
* A poor prognosis for good wound healing (e.g., decubitus ulcer, end-stage diabetes, severe protein deficiency and/or malnutrition)
* Any medical or surgical condition that would preclude the potential benefit of spinal implant surgery, prevent secure component fixation, or seriously increase the risk of tolerating any surgical procedure,
* Any other "contraindications" as enumerated in the device's "Instructions for Use".
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Zimmer Biomet

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Alabama Spine Institute

Daphne, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Ronderos Neurosurgery Center

Mobile, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Loma Linda University Orthopedic Center

San Bernardino, California, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2006-016

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Titanium vs. PEEK Fusion Devices in 1 Level TLIF
NCT05691062 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION PHASE4
Condition of Approval Study
NCT00517751 TERMINATED PHASE4