Evaluating Predictors & Interventions in Sphincter of Oddi Dysfunction
NCT ID: NCT00688662
Last Updated: 2018-04-19
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
214 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2008-07-31
2016-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Prophylactic Sphincterotomy in Acute Biliary Pancreatitis Patients Unfit for Surgery
NCT07238296
Pinaverium Bromide in Post-cholecystectomy Sphincter of Oddi Dysfunction
NCT02833103
SpHincterotomy for Acute Recurrent Pancreatitis
NCT03609944
Comparing the Effects of EST and EPBD in Patients With Acute Biliary Pancreatitis
NCT02668081
ERCP in Idiopathic Recurrent Acute Pancreatitis
NCT01583517
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Study Sites Seven clinical centers in US
Study Period Planned enrollment period - 3 years
Planned duration of the study - 5 years
Study Population SOD III Patients
Primary Study Objective: To ascertain whether subjects with SOD III respond to sphincterotomy,
Secondary Study Objectives
To evaluate:
* the association between the results of Sphincter of Oddi Manometry (SOM) (abnormal/normal) and the primary outcome (success/failure);
* the success rate (as defined in the primary) of subjects who receive biliary sphincterotomy alone versus subjects who receive both biliary and pancreatic sphincterotomy in the subgroup of patients with manometrically proven hypertension of the pancreatic sphincter;
* the effects of pre-specified prognostic factors on the primary outcome;
* anxiety and depression scores over time and their relation to study outcomes;
* the economic impact of SOD III, and of endoscopic sphincterotomy in patients with SOD III; and, to,
* conduct a careful follow-up study (EPISOD2) of standard of care treatment (separate protocol).
Study Design The EPISOD Trial is a parallel, randomized, double-blinded, sham-controlled, multicenter Phase III clinical trial of endoscopic sphincterotomy as treatment for adults 18 to 65 years of age diagnosed with SOD III.
Sample Size A minimum of 214 subjects will be randomized using a 2:1 allocation in favor of sphincterotomy and will be followed for 12 months post-randomization.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
1.ERCP with sphincterotomy
ERCP with sphincterotomy: cutting the biliary sphincter muscle (sphincterotomy)
ERCP with sphincterotomy
cutting the biliary sphincter muscle (sphincterotomy)
2.ERCP without sphincterotomy
ERCP without cutting the biliary sphincter muscle (sphincterotomy)
ERCP without sphincterotomy
ERCP with sphincter manometry, but no sphincterotomy
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
ERCP with sphincterotomy
cutting the biliary sphincter muscle (sphincterotomy)
ERCP without sphincterotomy
ERCP with sphincter manometry, but no sphincterotomy
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Pain burden of Grade 3 or higher on RAPID Questionnaire.
3. Cholecystectomy more than 90 days before enrollment.
4. Laboratory Tests: Results of blood tests taken within 1 week preceding the baseline visit and any others available from the preceding 6 months (post-cholecystectomy):Direct bilirubin, alkaline phosphatase, amylase and lipase results must be no greater than 2 X the upper level of normal.Transaminase levels can be no more than 3 X upper limit of normal. If the transaminases are elevated (\<2X ULN) in association with a pain attack, they cannot have returned to normal within 3 days.
5. Normal abdominal imaging by CT or MR/MRCP with bile duct reported at ≤9mm.
6. Upper endoscopy examination without findings to explain the pain.
7. Pain persisting despite a one trial of acid suppressant medications for one month (if tolerated).
8. Pain persisting despite a trial of antispasmodics.
9. Subjects on antidepressants for pain control (not required) should be taking them for a minimum of one month prior to the baseline assessment.
9.Patients with SOD with depressive and/or anxiety disorders who receive psychopharmacologic treatment must be on stable medication dose for at least 6 weeks.
10.Access to a telephone. 11.Must be able to speak, read, and write English. 12.Signed and dated informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Age \< 18 or Age \> 65.
3. Pregnancy: Women who are pregnant at the time of Screening\* will be excluded from the study. (\*Note: Women who become pregnant AFTER the Baseline Visit/ERCP will be allowed to remain in the study for telephone follow-up visits).
4. Prior gastric resection or surgery involving biliary diversion.
5. Prior diagnosis of acute pancreatitis (lipase \>3 x ULN) including post-ERCP pancreatitis, or of chronic pancreatitis by radiological imaging, EUS 5 or more criteria, or Cambridge criteria moderate or more on ERCP.
6. Daily use of prescription analgesics over the previous month.
7. Abdominal discomfort every day for the past month at level of 3 or more on a scale of 1-10.
8. Presence of significant psychiatric disorders:
1. Lifetime psychotic disorders, bipolar disorder;
2. Substance use disorders within 6 months;
3. Eating disorders within 2 years
4. Moderate \& severe depression defined by BDI-II (Beck Depression Inventory) cutoff scores \>22 (unless receiving stable psychiatric therapy for six weeks); and/or,
5. Suicidal risk (equal to or greater than "low") using MINI suicide section or a score of greater than 0 on question 9 of the BDI.
9. The total number of days in the previous 3 months that the subject has taken prescription analgesics due to episodes of abdominal pain is greater than the total number of days the subject had episodes of abdominal pain.
10. Any condition that, in the investigator's opinion, makes the subject unsuitable for study participation.
ERCP Criteria:
1. Pancreas divisum (complete or partial) (known or discovered at study ERCP).
2. Any pathology found at ERCP (except sphincter hypertension).
3. Failed pancreatic manometry.
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)
NIH
Medical University of South Carolina
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Peter Cotton
Study Chair
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Joseph Romagnuolo, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Medical Universtiy of South Carolina
Martin Freeman, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Minnesota
Richard Kozarek, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Virginia Mason Medical Center
Evan Fogel, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Indiana University
Peter Cotton, MD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
MUSC Digestive Disease Center
Paul Tarnasky, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Digestive Health Associates of Texas
Giuseppe Aliperti, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Midwest Therapeutic Endoscopy Consultants
Priya Jamidar, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Yale University
Jose Serrano
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Yale University
New Haven, Connecticut, United States
Indiana University
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
University of Minnesota
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
Midwest Therapeutic Endoscopy Consultants
St Louis, Missouri, United States
Medical University of South Carolina Digestive Disease Center
Charleston, South Carolina, United States
Methodist Dallas Medical Center
Dallas, Texas, United States
Virginia Mason Medical Center
Seattle, Washington, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Yaghoobi M, Pauls Q, Durkalski V, Romagnuolo J, Fogel EL, Tarnasky PR, Aliperti G, Freeman ML, Kozarek RA, Jamidar PA, Wilcox CM, Elta GH, Hawes RH, Wood-Williams A, Cotton PB. Incidence and predictors of post-ERCP pancreatitis in patients with suspected sphincter of Oddi dysfunction undergoing biliary or dual sphincterotomy: results from the EPISOD prospective multicenter randomized sham-controlled study. Endoscopy. 2015 Oct;47(10):884-90. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1392418. Epub 2015 Jul 10.
Cotton PB, Durkalski V, Romagnuolo J, Pauls Q, Fogel E, Tarnasky P, Aliperti G, Freeman M, Kozarek R, Jamidar P, Wilcox M, Serrano J, Brawman-Mintzer O, Elta G, Mauldin P, Thornhill A, Hawes R, Wood-Williams A, Orrell K, Drossman D, Robuck P. Effect of endoscopic sphincterotomy for suspected sphincter of Oddi dysfunction on pain-related disability following cholecystectomy: the EPISOD randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2014 May;311(20):2101-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.5220.
Romagnuolo J, Cotton PB, Durkalski V, Pauls Q, Brawman-Mintzer O, Drossman DA, Mauldin P, Orrell K, Williams AW, Fogel EL, Tarnasky PR, Aliperti G, Freeman ML, Kozarek RA, Jamidar PA, Wilcox CM, Serrano J, Elta GH. Can patient and pain characteristics predict manometric sphincter of Oddi dysfunction in patients with clinically suspected sphincter of Oddi dysfunction? Gastrointest Endosc. 2014 May;79(5):765-72. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2013.11.037. Epub 2014 Jan 25.
Cotton PB, Durkalski V, Orrell KB, Brawman-Mintzer O, Drossman DA, Wilcox CM, Mauldin PD, Elta GH, Tarnasky PR, Fogel EL, Jagganath SB, Kozarek RA, Freeman ML, Romagnuolo J, Robuck PR. Challenges in planning and initiating a randomized clinical study of sphincter of Oddi dysfunction. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Nov;72(5):986-91. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.08.022.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
DK074739
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.