Endoscopic Ultrasonography (EUS) Guided Gallbladder Drainage With Two Months Stent Removal for Acute Cholecystitis: a Prospective Study
NCT ID: NCT05272007
Last Updated: 2022-04-01
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
30 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2022-02-28
2024-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Recently, LAMS have been incorporated into a delivery system with an electrocautery mounted on the tip which allows the device to be used directly to penetrate the target structure without the need to utilize a 19G needle, a guidewire, and a cystotome for prior dilation. Different are actually the indication of the LAMS for different disease and its use has been described for drainage of peri-pancreatic fluid collections, common bile duct (CBD), gallbladder, and for creation of gastro-jejuno anastomosis.
Recently, endoscopic gallbladder (GB) drainage was found to be a potentially revolutionary alternative for cholecystectomy for the control of symptoms, definitive treatment, or bridging therapy until surgery is possible.
Before the advent of LAMS, the standard of care of acute cholecystitis (AC) was the percutaneous drainage (PTC) and after the advent of these new stents, different series showed the higher technical and clinical success of the EUS-gallbladder drainage (EUS-GB) for acute cholecystitis, with a lower recurrence rate, than PTC. The superiority of this technique was assessed in terms of technical and clinical success, AEs and AC recurrence if compared to the endoscopic drainage. This could be explained with the use of larger caliber stents, allowing an effective drainage, with low risk of stent occlusion. Finally, a recent study with a long-term follow-up showed as the outcomes of EUS-GBD for AC were comparable with LC with acceptable rates of recurrent acute cholecystitis.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
EUS-guided Gallbladder Drainage Instead of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Acute Cholecystitis. A Feasibility Study.
NCT04197908
Hong Kong Follow up Protocol After EUS Gallbladder Drainage for Acute Cholecistitis
NCT04874103
Endosonography-guided Gallbladder Drainage vs Non-endoscopic Treatment in Inoperable Acute Cholecystitis
NCT05702775
A Randomized Controlled Trial on EGBD vs PC for Acute Cholecystitis.
NCT02212717
Elective Endoscopic Gallbladder Treatment: Pilot Study
NCT05723224
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Acute cholecystitis
EUS-biliary drainage
EUS-GBD with LAMS
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
EUS-biliary drainage
EUS-GBD with LAMS
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients arrived to the ER for AC with clinical and radiological evidence of AC (such as abdominal ultrasound, computed tomography or magnetic resonance)
* EUS gallbladder accessibility from the duodenum or from the stomach for the drainage
* Agree to receive follow up phone calls
* Able to provide written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
* Use of anticoagulants that cannot be discontinued
* Pregnant women
* Inability to sign the informed consent
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Istituto Clinico Humanitas Mater Domini
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Humanitas-Mater Domini
Castellanza, , Italy
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
06-2022
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.