EUS BD vs ERCP TP for Pancreatic Cancer

NCT ID: NCT03063554

Last Updated: 2017-02-24

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

120 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-10-18

Study Completion Date

2018-10-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This Endoscopic Ultrasound guided Biliary Drainage (EUS-BD) vs. Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP-TP) trial (BILPAL) is a randomized controlled multicenter trial that will provide evidence whether or not traditional ERCP biliary drainage is to be performed in patients with obstruction in bile duct due to unresectable pancreatic head or periampullary tumor.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Obstructive jaundice is the most common symptom in patients with periampullary cancer and cancer of the pancreatic head. For patients with unresectable tumors, palliation of malignant obstructive is traditionally achieved using endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with transpapillary (TP) stent placement. Data show that ERCP is equivalent to surgery with regards to relief of jaundice. Self-expandable metal stents (SEMS) offer prolonged palliation compared to large-bore (10Fr) plastic stents. However, it is believed that gastric outlet obstruction occurs more commonly in patients who have received SEMS for palliation of MOJ. In addition, ERCP is associated with adverse events including pancreatitis, post-sphincterotomy bleeding, and perforation.

More recently endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided biliary drainage has been described for biliary drainage in patients with malignant distal bile duct obstruction. Thus far it has been used as a rescue approach when traditional ERCP-guided transpapillary biliary drainage ERCP fails. TP failure can occur as a result of duodenal obstruction, failed cannulation, and failed wire access across the stricture.

Potential advantages of EUS-guided biliary drainage include avoidance of pancreatitis and post-sphincterotomy bleeding. Additionally, it may result in a lower frequency of gastric outlet obstruction since the stent does not encroach upon the tumor.

To compare the potential advantages of EUS-guided biliary drainage the investigators are conducting a multicenter, randomized trial comparing the EUS-guided drainage to traditional ERCP.

This EUS-BD vs. ERCP-TP-trial (BILPAL) is a randomized controlled multicenter trial that will provide evidence whether or not traditional ERCP biliary drainage is to be performed in patients with obstruction in bile duct due to unresectable pancreatic head or periampullary tumor.

This study will enroll 120 subjects; 60 subjects in each arm. Trial duration is about 1 year and involves 5-7 visits.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pancreatic Cancer Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Biliary Tract Neoplasms Biliary Duct Obstruction Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer Periampullary Cancer Periampullary Carcinoma Non-Resectable

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Biliary Drainage

Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided biliary drainage with stent placement. EUS via either stomach or duodenum.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Biliary Drainage

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided biliary drainage with stent placement;

ERCP

Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography with transpapillary biliary stent placement only.

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

ERCP

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography with transpapillary biliary stent placement

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Biliary Drainage

Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided biliary drainage with stent placement;

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

ERCP

Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography with transpapillary biliary stent placement

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

EUSBD ERCP-TP

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Age between 18 and 90 years old
2. Clinically indicated for biliary endoscopic drainage with Endoscopic Ultrasound guidance or ERCP
3. CT scan has demonstrated a lesion in the pancreatic head area with metastases and/ or local tumor ingrowth preventing resection.
4. CT with evidence of distant metastases or local tumor ingrowth into portal or mesenteric vessels (as defined by the tumor surrounding the vessel for at least 180 degrees of the circumference)
5. A serum bilirubin level of \> 2.5mg/dL at randomization
6. Deemed surgically unresectable
7. Consents to participation in the randomized controlled trial

Exclusion Criteria

1. \> 90 years
2. Severe comorbidity (Karnofsky \<50%)
3. Any prior successful previous biliary drainage including ERCP and stenting, percutaneous biliary and surgical,
4. Prior surgically altered pancreaticobiliary or gastroduodenal anatomy.
5. Female of childbearing potential with a positive pregnancy test prior to the procedure or intends to become pregnant during the study.
6. Currently participating in another device trial that has not completed the primary endpoint or that clinically interferes with the endpoints of this study.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

90 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Weill Medical College of Cornell University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Michel Kahaleh

Chief of Endoscopy

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Michel Kahaleh, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Weill Medical College of Cornell University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Weill Cornell Medical College

New York, New York, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Michel Kahaleh, MD

Role: CONTACT

646-962-4797

Monica R Gaidhane, MPH

Role: CONTACT

646-962-4796

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Michel Kahaleh, MD

Role: primary

646-962-4797

Monica R Gaidhane, MPH

Role: backup

646-962-4796 ext. Gaidhane

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

1603017104

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

A RCT of Low MBO Drainage Strategies
NCT06196164 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA
EUS Biliary Drainage vs. ERCP
NCT03870386 COMPLETED NA