Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
120 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-10-18
2018-10-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Endoscopic Ultrasound and Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography for Malignant Distal Biliary Obstruction
NCT03054987
EUS-guided Biliary Drainage vs. ERCP Assisted Transpapillary Drainage for Malignant Biliary Obstruction
NCT03812250
Bile Duct Drainage After ERCP Failure: EUS-BD vs PTBD
NCT05519605
Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Biliary Drainage for Malignant Biliary Obstruction After Failed ERCP
NCT03510754
Endoscopic Bipolar Radiofrequency Probe (ENDOHPB) in the Management of Unresectable Bile Duct and Pancreatic Cancer
NCT01303159
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
More recently endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided biliary drainage has been described for biliary drainage in patients with malignant distal bile duct obstruction. Thus far it has been used as a rescue approach when traditional ERCP-guided transpapillary biliary drainage ERCP fails. TP failure can occur as a result of duodenal obstruction, failed cannulation, and failed wire access across the stricture.
Potential advantages of EUS-guided biliary drainage include avoidance of pancreatitis and post-sphincterotomy bleeding. Additionally, it may result in a lower frequency of gastric outlet obstruction since the stent does not encroach upon the tumor.
To compare the potential advantages of EUS-guided biliary drainage the investigators are conducting a multicenter, randomized trial comparing the EUS-guided drainage to traditional ERCP.
This EUS-BD vs. ERCP-TP-trial (BILPAL) is a randomized controlled multicenter trial that will provide evidence whether or not traditional ERCP biliary drainage is to be performed in patients with obstruction in bile duct due to unresectable pancreatic head or periampullary tumor.
This study will enroll 120 subjects; 60 subjects in each arm. Trial duration is about 1 year and involves 5-7 visits.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Biliary Drainage
Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided biliary drainage with stent placement. EUS via either stomach or duodenum.
Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Biliary Drainage
Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided biliary drainage with stent placement;
ERCP
Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography with transpapillary biliary stent placement only.
ERCP
Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography with transpapillary biliary stent placement
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Biliary Drainage
Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided biliary drainage with stent placement;
ERCP
Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography with transpapillary biliary stent placement
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Clinically indicated for biliary endoscopic drainage with Endoscopic Ultrasound guidance or ERCP
3. CT scan has demonstrated a lesion in the pancreatic head area with metastases and/ or local tumor ingrowth preventing resection.
4. CT with evidence of distant metastases or local tumor ingrowth into portal or mesenteric vessels (as defined by the tumor surrounding the vessel for at least 180 degrees of the circumference)
5. A serum bilirubin level of \> 2.5mg/dL at randomization
6. Deemed surgically unresectable
7. Consents to participation in the randomized controlled trial
Exclusion Criteria
2. Severe comorbidity (Karnofsky \<50%)
3. Any prior successful previous biliary drainage including ERCP and stenting, percutaneous biliary and surgical,
4. Prior surgically altered pancreaticobiliary or gastroduodenal anatomy.
5. Female of childbearing potential with a positive pregnancy test prior to the procedure or intends to become pregnant during the study.
6. Currently participating in another device trial that has not completed the primary endpoint or that clinically interferes with the endpoints of this study.
18 Years
90 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Weill Medical College of Cornell University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Michel Kahaleh
Chief of Endoscopy
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Michel Kahaleh, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Weill Medical College of Cornell University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Weill Cornell Medical College
New York, New York, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
1603017104
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.