Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
181 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2018-09-27
2025-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
EUS + Sham
Subjects randomized to EUS + sham will undergo a diagnostic endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) under sedation. The physician investigator will not make any attempts to achieve minor papilla cannulation, but photo document the minor papilla using a duodenoscope. Diluted dye will be injected into the duodenum. A small caliber prophylactic pancreatic duct stent will be deposited into the duodenal lumen. These maneuvers are performed to minimize the risk of unmasking.
EUS
Endoscopic ultrasound
EUS + ERCP with miES
Subjects randomized to EUS + ERCP with miES will undergo the procedure at the same time as endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), under sedation. Indomethacin (100 mg) will be administered rectally at the onset of the ERCP procedure in patients with no known allergy to indomethacin. The techniques used to perform the endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)with miES (minor papilla endoscopic sphincterotomy) will be left to the discretion of the study endoscopist. The extent of sphincterotomy will be per the discretion of the treating endoscopist. Unless methylene blue (or similar chromoendoscopy agent such as indigo carmine) has already been used to facilitate minor papilla cannulation, diluted dye will be injected into the duodenum.
ERCP with miES
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with minor papilla endoscopic sphincterotomy
EUS
Endoscopic ultrasound
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
ERCP with miES
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with minor papilla endoscopic sphincterotomy
EUS
Endoscopic ultrasound
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. \>18 years
3. Two or more episodes of acute pancreatitis, with each episode meeting two of the following three criteria:
* abdominal pain consistent with acute pancreatitis (acute onset of a persistent, severe, epigastric pain often radiating to the back)
* serum lipase activity (or amylase activity) at least three times greater than the upper limit of normal
* characteristic findings of acute pancreatitis on CECT, MRI or transabdominal ultrasonography
4. At least one episode of acute pancreatitis within 24 months of enrollment
5. Pancreas divisum confirmed by prior MRCP that is reviewed by an abdominal radiologist at the recruiting site.
6. By physician assessment, there is no certain explanation for recurrent acute pancreatitis.
7. Subjects must be able to fully understand and participate in all aspects of the study, including completion of questionnaires and telephone interviews, in the opinion of the clinical investigator
Exclusion Criteria
2. Calcific chronic pancreatitis, defined as parenchymal or ductal calcifications identified on computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging scan that is reviewed by an expert radiologist at the recruiting site.
3. Main pancreatic duct stricture\*
4. Presence of a structural etiology for acute pancreatitis, such as anomalous pancreatobiliary union, periampullary mass, or pancreatic mass lesion on imaging\*
5. Presence of a local complication from acute pancreatitis which requires pancreatogram
6. Regular use of opioid medication for abdominal pain for the past three months
7. Medication as the etiology for acute pancreatitis by physician assessment
8. TWEAK score ≥ 4
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)
NIH
Oregon Health and Science University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Gregory Cote
Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Gregory A Cote, MD, MS
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Oregon Health and Science University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
Little Rock, Arkansas, United States
Keck Hospital of USC
Los Angeles, California, United States
Cedars-Sinai
Los Angeles, California, United States
UCSF Medical Center
San Francisco, California, United States
Yale School of Medicine
New Haven, Connecticut, United States
Emory University Hospital
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Northwestern University
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Indiana University
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
University of Minnesota
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
Saint Luke's Hospital System
Kansas City, Missouri, United States
Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center
Lebanon, New Hampshire, United States
University of Rochester
Rochester, New York, United States
The Ohio State University - Wexner Medical Center
Columbus, Ohio, United States
Oregon Health and Science University
Portland, Oregon, United States
University of Pittsburgh Medical Center
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
Medical University of South Carolina
Charleston, South Carolina, United States
Methodist Dallas Medical Center
Dallas, Texas, United States
University of Virginia
Charlottesville, Virginia, United States
Virginia Mason Hospital & Seattle Medical Center
Seattle, Washington, United States
Health Sciences Centre
Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Cote GA, Durkalski-Mauldin VL, Serrano J, Klintworth E, Williams AW, Cruz-Monserrate Z, Arain M, Buxbaum JL, Conwell DL, Fogel EL, Freeman ML, Gardner TB, van Geenen E, Groce JR, Jonnalagadda SS, Keswani RN, Menon S, Moffatt DC, Papachristou GI, Ross A, Tarnasky PR, Wang AY, Wilcox CM, Hamilton F, Yadav D; SHARP Consortium. SpHincterotomy for Acute Recurrent Pancreatitis Randomized Trial: Rationale, Methodology, and Potential Implications. Pancreas. 2019 Sep;48(8):1061-1067. doi: 10.1097/MPA.0000000000001370.
Cote GA, Durkalski-Mauldin V, Williams A, Nitchie H, Serrano J, Yadav D; SHARP Consortium. Design and execution of sham-controlled endoscopic trials in acute pancreatitis: Lessons learned from the SHARP trial. Pancreatology. 2023 Mar;23(2):187-191. doi: 10.1016/j.pan.2022.12.011. Epub 2022 Dec 21.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
1922
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id