Trial of Index Cholecystectomy Versus Scheduled Cholecystectomy in Biliary Pancreatitis

NCT ID: NCT02630433

Last Updated: 2017-11-14

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

65 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2009-08-31

Study Completion Date

2017-11-12

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

There are controversies optimal timing for cholecystectomy in patients with mild biliary pancreatitis. The safety of cholecystectomy performed during an episode of pancreatitis has been questioned. The aim of the present randomized controlled trial is to compare the outcome in terms of recurrent pancreatitis and gallstone-related events between index cholecystectomy, performed during the first admission for acute pancreatitis, and scheduled cholecystectomy, performed 4-6 weeks after discharge.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Background:

There is still considerable debate regarding the optimal timing of cholecystectomy in mild biliary pancreatitis. It is widely accepted to wait until the patient's clinical condition allows performing cholecystectomy in severe biliary pancreatitis with systemic or local complications. On the other hand, the recommendations are not very clear when it comes to patients with mild biliary pancreatitis. The British Society of Gastroenterology and American Gastroenterological Association guidelines recommendation is to perform cholecystectomy within 2-to 4- week interval after the initial episode. However, the safety of cholecystectomy performed during an episode of pancreatitis is also controversial.

In a systematic review the overall readmission rate was 18% after index cholecystectomy, 8% for recurrent biliary pancreatitis, 3 % for acute cholecystitis and 7 % for biliary colic.

Methods The study is performed as a Randomised controlled trials with two parallel arms and a ratio of 1:1. Patients admitted with acute pancreatitis are checked for eligibility criteria for the study. Mild pancreatitis is defined as pancreatitis without local complications such as necrosis or organ failure. Patients who are eligible obtained oral and written information about the study and invited to be included. Patients who accept participation sign a consent form and are included. The included patients are randomized into index cholecystectomy (IC) or scheduled cholecystectomy (SC).

Randomization is done with a sealed envelope system. The allocation sequence is created by an online random generator. There is no blocking. After randomization, the patient as well as the responsible are immediately informed about the allocation.

The IC and SC are protocolled to be performed within 24-48 hours from randomization, and after 6 weeks from discharge respectively. Daily blood samples, pain and well-being scores are obtained during index admission until discharge, at 1-month follow-up for SC group and at the scheduled cholecystectomy. Quality of life is assessed with SF-36 prior to randomization and 4 weeks after inclusion. Pain is measured with the McGill Pain Questionnaire before randomization and daily until discharge of two days after inclusion.

Sample size estimation If IC reduces the risk of gallstone- or treatment-related adverse events from 40% to 10%, a total sample of 32 patients in each group is required in order to reach a chance of 80% of detecting a significant difference at the p\<0.05 level. In order to compensate of drop-outs, a total sample of 70 is stipulated.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pancreatitis

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Biliary pancreatitis Cholecystectomy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Index cholecystectomy

Cholecystectomy within 48 hours after inclusion.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Index cholecystectomy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Cholecystectomy performed within 48 hours after inclusion, before discharge after admission for acute biliary pancreatitis.

Scheduled cholecystectomy

Cholecystectomy 6 weeks after inclusion.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Scheduled cholecystectomy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Cholecystectomy performed as a scheduled procedure 6 weeks after the first admission.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Index cholecystectomy

Cholecystectomy performed within 48 hours after inclusion, before discharge after admission for acute biliary pancreatitis.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Scheduled cholecystectomy

Cholecystectomy performed as a scheduled procedure 6 weeks after the first admission.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* S-Amylase \>3 microkat/L
* One or more gallstones with diameter \< 2 cm
* S-CRP \< 150 mg/L the first 24 hours

Exclusion Criteria

* Multiple organ failure
* Solitary gallstone with diameter \>2 cm
* Concurrent cholangitis
* Hospital stay exceeding 72 hours before screening for inclusion
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Karolinska Institutet

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Gabriel Sandblom

Associate Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Gabriel Sandblom, Ass prof

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Karolinska Institutet, CLINTEC

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Karolinska University Hospital, Center for Digestive Diseases

Stockholm, , Sweden

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Sweden

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Noel R, Arnelo U, Lundell L, Hammarqvist F, Jumaa H, Enochsson L, Sandblom G. Index versus delayed cholecystectomy in mild gallstone pancreatitis: results of a randomized controlled trial. HPB (Oxford). 2018 Oct;20(10):932-938. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2018.03.016. Epub 2018 Apr 25.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 29703649 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Gallstenspancreatitistudien

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id