Improving Clinician Communication Skills (ICCS)

NCT ID: NCT00687349

Last Updated: 2014-09-16

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

6086 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2007-04-30

Study Completion Date

2013-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This research study is a randomized trial to evaluate a training program that is designed to improve the communication skills of clinicians. The training program focuses on care for patients with serious illnesses and their family members, and assesses effectiveness using patient and family outcomes. The long term goal of this research is to improve communication skills of doctors and nurses, thereby improving patient and family outcomes.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Three decades of research on end-of-life care in the United States indicates that people who are dying often spend their final days with a significant burden of pain and other symptoms and receive care they would not choose. Patient-clinician communication about end-of-life care is an important focus for improving patient-centered end-of-life care for three reasons: 1) it is an integral component of clinician skill that affects all other aspects of end-of-life care; 2) physicians and nurses in practice do not demonstrate adequate skills for communicating about end-of-life care; and 3) current training in end-of-life communication is inadequate. Studies have shown that clinicians can improve their communication skills with experiential training, but no studies to date have shown that an intervention to improve clinician communication skill improves patient outcomes. Furthermore, despite widespread knowledge that end-of-life care is best delivered in an interdisciplinary context, most studies do not incorporate interdisciplinary training that includes physicians and nurses.

This is a randomized trial of a communication skills workshop for internal medicine residents and nurse practitioner (NP) students. A total of 373 residents and 128 NP students from two large training programs (UW and MUSC) will be randomized to either the intervention or usual education. The study's primary outcome measure will be the QOC scores on the "communication about end-of-life care" domain. The QOC will be assessed by patients, family members, and nurses before and after the intervention time period for all trainees. Secondary outcome measures are patient symptoms and patient-, family - and nurse-assessed QEOLC scores. Outcome measures will be collected for 5 patients and family members per trainee before the intervention period and 5 patients and family members per trainee after the intervention period. Process measures for both residents and NP students will include pre- and post-intervention assessment of knowledge, attitudes, and behavior regarding communication using standardized patient assessment as well as self-assessment and faculty assessment.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Advanced Cancer Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Restrictive Lung Disease Congestive Heart Failure End Stage Liver Disease

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Intervention Arm

The training program will assign resident or NP student to a rotation. They will be receiving the educational intervention during 8 half-day sessions.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Training Program Intervention

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Resident or NP Student receives the educational intervention during 8 half-day sessions.

Control Arm

Resident or NP student is assigned to usual education.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Training Program Intervention

Resident or NP Student receives the educational intervention during 8 half-day sessions.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Physician:

* all internal medicine residents at either University of Washington (UW)or the Medical University of South Carolina
* who have a clinical rotation allowing implementation of the intervention.

NP Student:

* All NP Students at UW or MUSC
* in programs that train them to work with the following patient types:
* Adult patents with Cancer or other chronic, life-limiting illnesses
* Older Adults
* Adults Primary Care Patients

Patient:

One or more of the following diagnostic criteria:

* Advanced Cancer;
* Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) with FEV1 values \< 35% predicted and/or oxygen dependent;
* Restrictive lung disease with a TLC \< 50% predicted;
* Congestive heart failure with an ejection fraction \<30% or functional deficits matching New York Heart Association Class III or IV heart failure;
* End stage liver disease including Child's Class C cirrhosis, MELD score ≥ 18, a variceal bleed, refractory ascites, or spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP);
* a Charlson Comorbidity Score point value ≥6;
* in-patients with a University HealthSystem Consortium (UHC) Risk of Mortality score of major or extreme;
* OR hospitalized patients ≥ 80 years.

Family:

* The ability to speak English well enough to be able to complete the study procedures
* AND no significant dementia or delirium that would limit the family member's ability to complete instruments.

Nurse-evaluators:

* are working in the hospital or clinic with the resident or NP student enrolled in the study.

Exclusion Criteria

* less than 18 years,
* significant dementia, delirium, or psychosis;
* the inability to speak English well enough to be able to complete the study procedures.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Washington

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

J. Randall Curtis

Professor of Medicine

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

J. Randall Curtis, MD, MPH

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Washington, Div. of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Medical University of South Carolina

Charleston, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

University of Washington; Harborview Medical Center

Seattle, Washington, United States

Site Status

Veteran's Affairs Puget Sound HCS

Seattle, Washington, United States

Site Status

University of Washington; UW Medical Center

Seattle, Washington, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Curtis JR, Back AL, Ford DW, Downey L, Shannon SE, Doorenbos AZ, Kross EK, Reinke LF, Feemster LC, Edlund B, Arnold RW, O'Connor K, Engelberg RA. Effect of communication skills training for residents and nurse practitioners on quality of communication with patients with serious illness: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2013 Dec 4;310(21):2271-81. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.282081.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 24302090 (View on PubMed)

Ford DW, Downey L, Engelberg R, Back AL, Curtis JR. Association between Physician Trainee Self-Assessments in Discussing Religion and Spirituality and Their Patients' Reports. J Palliat Med. 2014 Apr;17(4):453-62. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2013.0388. Epub 2014 Mar 20.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 24649963 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

R01NR009987

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

31466-G

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

The Fundamentals of Communication in Surgery
NCT06654310 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
Ontological Coaching Among Nurses (OCN)
NCT06878157 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA