Level of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) in Preterm Infants After Extubation (L-CPAP Study)
NCT ID: NCT00636324
Last Updated: 2009-02-10
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
PHASE2
23 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2007-07-31
2010-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Infant Pulmonary Mechanics: High Flow Nasal Cannula Versus Nasal CPAP
NCT01939067
Optimal High CPAP Pressures in Preterm Neonates Post-extubation
NCT05230485
Oscillatory Versus Non-oscillatory Nasal Continuous Airway Pressure Neonatal Respiratory Support
NCT03711565
A Comparison of Methods of Discontinuing Nasal CPAP in Premature Infants <30 Weeks Gestation
NCT03292562
Oscillatory Versus Non-Oscillatory Nasal Continuous Airway Pressure Neonatal Respiratory Support
NCT01277874
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Physiologic studies show higher nCPAP pressures improve lung mechanical properties. Though potential side effects have been of concern in practical application, there is no formal evidence supporting the concept that increased CPAP pressure results in a higher risk of complications. In relatively stable preterm infants, the range of optimal CPAP level needs to be established in order to adequately support the upper airway and lungs, without increasing complications secondary to the pressure applied. Given the uncertainty of the nCPAP pressure that should be used in very preterm infants, we conduct a randomized controlled trial to compare the effectiveness of two ranges of nCPAP pressure for post-extubation support in very preterm infants.
The purpose of this trial is to compare the rate of successful extubation of using the nasal CPAP level of 7 to 9 cmH2O compared to level of 4 to 6 cmH2O.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
1
Nasal CPAP, level of 7 to 9 cmH2O
Nasal CPAP, level 7 to 9 cmH2O
Apply nasal CPAP pressure of 7-9 H2O for the first 72 hours of extubation
2
Nasal CPAP, level 4 to 6 cmH2O
Nasal CPAP, level 4 to 6 cmH2O
Apply nasal CPAP pressure of 4 to 6 cmH2O for the first 72 hours of extubation
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Nasal CPAP, level 7 to 9 cmH2O
Apply nasal CPAP pressure of 7-9 H2O for the first 72 hours of extubation
Nasal CPAP, level 4 to 6 cmH2O
Apply nasal CPAP pressure of 4 to 6 cmH2O for the first 72 hours of extubation
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* On mechanical ventilation before 7 days of age
* First extubation before 14 days of age
Exclusion Criteria
* IVH, grade 3 or 4
* Neuromuscular disorders
* Receiving muscle relaxation at time of extubation
* Congenital heart disease, except for PDA
* GI problems resulting in a need to avoid gastric distension
14 Days
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Hamilton Health Sciences Corporation
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Hamilton Health Sciences
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Giulherme M SantAnna, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Hamilton Health Sciences Corporation
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
REB project # 07-047
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.