Optimising Breathing Support at Extubation in Very Preterm Infants: A Clinical Study
NCT ID: NCT07251790
Last Updated: 2025-12-26
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
134 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2026-01-31
2028-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
This research study aims to compare two ways of performing extubation - both of which are already used regularly by doctors and nurses. The "standard extubation" approach involves taking a baby's breathing tube out first, then applying the nosepiece and starting nCPAP. The more recent approach, called "prePAP", involves applying the nosepiece and starting nCPAP before taking the breathing tube out. Previous research suggests that a prePAP approach may provide better support for babies during extubation. However, larger studies are required before this approach is more commonly used.
This study is investigating whether extubating the baby with prePAP is better than extubating the baby without prePAP.
The main question it aims to answer is: Does initiating nCPAP before extubation in very preterm babies reduce the fall in their oxygen levels post-extubation?
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Many infants born very preterm (\<32 weeks' gestation) are intubated at birth to receive respiratory support via invasive ventilation. While essential for survival, invasive ventilation can injure their underdeveloped lungs, disrupt lung development and increase the risk of bronchopulmonary dysplasia, a major cause of long-term respiratory morbidity.
Transitioning infants to non-invasive ventilation as soon as feasible is prioritised by clinicians. However, in very preterm infants, almost 40% of extubation attempts fail due to oxygen desaturation or lung collapse. Re-intubation due to extubation failure can induce further airway injury, cardiovascular instability, and oxygen desaturation, resulting in clinical deterioration and prolonged hospitalisation.
PrePAP has been recently suggested as a method of improving respiratory stability during extubation in preterm infants. PrePAP involves commencing nCPAP prior to extubation, with the intent to maintain lung volumes during extubation; preserving oxygenation from pre- to post-extubation. To date, there isn't any clinical evidence explaining the impact to the lungs when both mechanical ventilation and nCPAP are being applied, nor is there evidence that signals a benefit of using prePAP during extubation. Despite this, prePAP is already used in clinical practice and is described in certain neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) extubation guidelines in Australia.
The PrePAP trial is a prospective, multicentre, unblinded, randomised, controlled trial comparing extubation from mechanical ventilation to nCPAP with and without the application of prePAP in very preterm infants born \<30 weeks gestational age at first extubation.
Very preterm infants who meet all inclusion (and no exclusion) criteria will be randomised to receive one of two extubation procedures, placing them in either the "Extubation with prePAP" arm or the "Extubation without prePAP" arm:
1. Arm 1: Extubation with prePAP (intervention): nCPAP commenced prior to endotracheal tube removal
2. Arm 2: Extubation without prePAP (control): nCPAP commenced following endotracheal tube removal
For both arms, the intervention period will begin with a 2-to-5-minute pre-extubation period (whilst the infant is still ventilated), followed by a post-extubation period of up to 4 hours, and a follow-up period of up to 7 days (168 hours). The primary outcome (lowest S/F ratio) is assessed only during the (up to) 4-hour post-extubation period.
The results of this trial will determine the appropriate clinical outcomes and end point for a definitive, larger randomised trial to inform clinical practice.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
1. Arm 1: Extubation with prePAP (intervention): nCPAP commenced prior to endotracheal tube removal
2. Arm 2: Extubation without prePAP (control): nCPAP commenced following endotracheal tube removal
For both arms, the intervention period will begin with a 2-to-5-minute pre-extubation period (whilst the infant is still ventilated), followed by a post-extubation period of up to 4 hours, and a follow-up period of up to 7 days (168 hours).
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Extubation with prePAP
nCPAP commenced prior to endotracheal tube removal
Pre-extubation continuous positive airway pressure
Prior to extubation (2-to-5 minutes) a CPAP hat will be placed on the infant and the circuit set up. A nasal mask will be applied and nCPAP pressure will be commenced at 10 centimetres of water. Only after nCPAP has been in situ for 2 minutes (maximum 5 minutes) will the endotracheal tube be removed.
Extubation without prePAP
nCPAP commenced following endotracheal tube removal
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Pre-extubation continuous positive airway pressure
Prior to extubation (2-to-5 minutes) a CPAP hat will be placed on the infant and the circuit set up. A nasal mask will be applied and nCPAP pressure will be commenced at 10 centimetres of water. Only after nCPAP has been in situ for 2 minutes (maximum 5 minutes) will the endotracheal tube be removed.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* The infant is born between 22+0 to 29+6 weeks gestational age
* The infant has been on a form of invasive mechanical ventilation for at least 4 hours
* The infant is being electively extubated for the first time from invasive mechanical ventilation to nCPAP
* The infant is being electively extubated for the first time within 30 days from birth
* The infant is clinically stable (as per clinical and research team consensus)
* The parent(s) or legal guardian(s) provides prospective informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria
* The infant has a major congenital anomaly involving the cardiac, respiratory or gastrointestinal systems, or a known genetic syndrome or diagnosis that might affect respiratory course and outcomes
* The infant has severe pulmonary hypoplasia due to anhydramnios or oligohydramnios before 22 weeks in which the neonatal clinician anticipates that pulmonary hypoplasia related respiratory failure will be the major respiratory problem in early postnatal life
* The infant is receiving invasive mechanical ventilation via nasotracheal intubation
* The infant is planned for extubation to any other mode of non-invasive respiratory support than nCPAP, or no respiratory support
* Refusal of informed consent from the parent(s), or the infant does not have a guardian who can provide informed consent.
0 Hours
30 Days
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Western Health, Australia
OTHER_GOV
Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
UNKNOWN
Murdoch Childrens Research Institute
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Georgia S Stephen, BBmedSc BBiomedSc(Hons)
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Murdoch Childrens Research Institute
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
The Royal Women's Hospital
Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Joan Kirner Women's and Children's Hospital
Saint Albans, Victoria, Australia
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Risha Bhatia, MBBCh MA FRACP PhD
Role: primary
Georgia S Stephen, BBmedSc BBiomedSc(Hons)
Role: backup
Arun Sett, MBBS(Hons) FRACP PhD
Role: primary
Georgia S Stephen, BBmedSc BBiomedSc(Hons)
Role: backup
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Gaertner VD, Ruegger CM. Optimising success of neonatal extubation: Respiratory support. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2023 Oct;28(5):101491. doi: 10.1016/j.siny.2023.101491. Epub 2023 Nov 18.
Bhatia R, Carlisle HR, Armstrong RK, Kamlin COF, Davis PG, Tingay DG. Extubation generates lung volume inhomogeneity in preterm infants. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2022 Jan;107(1):82-86. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2021-321788. Epub 2021 Jun 23.
Plastina L, Gaertner VD, Waldmann AD, Thomann J, Bassler D, Ruegger CM. The DELUX study: development of lung volumes during extubation of preterm infants. Pediatr Res. 2022 Jul;92(1):242-248. doi: 10.1038/s41390-021-01699-w. Epub 2021 Aug 31.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
120475
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id