Optimal High CPAP Pressures in Preterm Neonates Post-extubation
NCT ID: NCT05230485
Last Updated: 2022-02-09
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
26 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-02-15
2024-02-15
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Cardiorespiratory Effects of "Higher" Versus "Equivalent" CPAP Upon Extubation From High EAP in Preterm Infants
NCT02528851
Post-extubation Pressures in Preterm Neonates: A CER Study
NCT06552455
Optimising Breathing Support at Extubation in Very Preterm Infants: A Clinical Study
NCT07251790
Level of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) in Preterm Infants After Extubation (L-CPAP Study)
NCT00636324
Oscillatory Versus Non-oscillatory Nasal Continuous Airway Pressure Neonatal Respiratory Support
NCT03711565
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
A particular knowledge gap in the current literature is the choice of the level of pressure level when using High CPAP as a post-extubation support mode. While it could be argued that the initial High CPAP pressure post-extubation should be somewhat higher than the pre-extubation mean airway pressure (Paw), there remain concerns of potential complications as well as uncertainty around degree of leak and resulting effectiveness. On the other hand, a suboptimal post-extubation High CPAP level may lead to atelectasis and contribute towards extubation failure, potentially prolonging invasive ventilation and associated risks. As such, research towards identification of the optimal High CPAP level post-extubation from high invasive ventilation pressures is warranted.
Objective: To comparatively evaluate the short-term impact of two different high CPAP pressures when used as a post-extubation support mode in preterm neonates.
Hypothesis: We hypothesize that babies extubated from invasive mechanical ventilation with a mean Paw between 9-15 cmH2O will demonstrate better physiological and clinical parameters when using High CPAP+2 cmH2O vs equivalent CPAP levels.
Methods: Design - This will be a prospective, single-centre, randomized cross-over study.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Higher CPAP
CPAP level will be 2 cmH2O higher than pre-extubation measured mean airway pressure
CPAP level
The level of continuous distending pressure (or positive end-expiratory pressure) chosen on CPAP
Equivalent CPAP
CPAP level will be equal to the pre-extubation measured mean airway pressure
CPAP level
The level of continuous distending pressure (or positive end-expiratory pressure) chosen on CPAP
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
CPAP level
The level of continuous distending pressure (or positive end-expiratory pressure) chosen on CPAP
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
7 Days
37 Weeks
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
McMaster Children's Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Amit Mukerji
Associate Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Amit Mukerji, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Associate Professor
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
McMaster Children's Hospital
Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
14289
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.