Optimal High CPAP Pressures in Preterm Neonates Post-extubation

NCT ID: NCT05230485

Last Updated: 2022-02-09

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

26 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-02-15

Study Completion Date

2024-02-15

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Use of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in preterm neonates has traditionally been limited to between 5-8 cmH2O. In recent years, use of CPAP pressures ≥9 cmH2O is becoming more common in neonates with evolving chronic lung disease, in lieu of other non-invasive modes or invasive mechanical ventilation. A particular knowledge gap in the current literature is the choice of the level of pressure level when using High CPAP as a post-extubation support mode. In this study, we will comparatively evaluate the short-term impact of two different high CPAP pressures when used as a post-extubation support mode in preterm neonates.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Background: Use of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in preterm neonates has traditionally been limited to between 5-8 cmH2O. In recent years, use of CPAP pressures ≥9 cmH2O is becoming more common in neonates with evolving chronic lung disease, in lieu of other non-invasive modes or invasive mechanical ventilation. However, there are limited data on the effectiveness and safety of this mode.

A particular knowledge gap in the current literature is the choice of the level of pressure level when using High CPAP as a post-extubation support mode. While it could be argued that the initial High CPAP pressure post-extubation should be somewhat higher than the pre-extubation mean airway pressure (Paw), there remain concerns of potential complications as well as uncertainty around degree of leak and resulting effectiveness. On the other hand, a suboptimal post-extubation High CPAP level may lead to atelectasis and contribute towards extubation failure, potentially prolonging invasive ventilation and associated risks. As such, research towards identification of the optimal High CPAP level post-extubation from high invasive ventilation pressures is warranted.

Objective: To comparatively evaluate the short-term impact of two different high CPAP pressures when used as a post-extubation support mode in preterm neonates.

Hypothesis: We hypothesize that babies extubated from invasive mechanical ventilation with a mean Paw between 9-15 cmH2O will demonstrate better physiological and clinical parameters when using High CPAP+2 cmH2O vs equivalent CPAP levels.

Methods: Design - This will be a prospective, single-centre, randomized cross-over study.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Preterm Birth Mechanical Ventilation Complication Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Higher CPAP

CPAP level will be 2 cmH2O higher than pre-extubation measured mean airway pressure

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

CPAP level

Intervention Type OTHER

The level of continuous distending pressure (or positive end-expiratory pressure) chosen on CPAP

Equivalent CPAP

CPAP level will be equal to the pre-extubation measured mean airway pressure

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

CPAP level

Intervention Type OTHER

The level of continuous distending pressure (or positive end-expiratory pressure) chosen on CPAP

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

CPAP level

The level of continuous distending pressure (or positive end-expiratory pressure) chosen on CPAP

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Gestational age \<29 weeks; chronological age \>7 days; post-menstrual age \<37 weeks; extubation from invasive ventilation with measured mean airway pressure 9-15 cmH2O

Exclusion Criteria

* Any congenital or genetic/chromosomal abnormality
Minimum Eligible Age

7 Days

Maximum Eligible Age

37 Weeks

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

McMaster Children's Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Amit Mukerji

Associate Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Amit Mukerji, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Associate Professor

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

McMaster Children's Hospital

Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Amit Mukerji, MD

Role: CONTACT

905-521-2100 ext. 76486

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

14289

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.