Nasal HFOV Versus Nasal CPAP to Reduce Post-extubation pCO2
NCT ID: NCT02340299
Last Updated: 2020-08-05
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
NA
6 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2015-01-01
2017-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Nasal High Frequency Oscillation Ventilation(NHFOV) for Respiratory Distress Syndrome
NCT03140891
Nasal High-frequency Oscillatory Ventilation (NHFOV) for Ventilated Newborn Infants With BPD
NCT04905732
Nasal High Frequency Oscillatory Versus Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation in Neonate After Extubation
NCT02543125
NHFOV vs. NCPAP as a Primary Treatment to Neonatal Respiratory Distress Syndrome(NRDS)
NCT03099694
Oscillatory Versus Non-oscillatory Nasal Continuous Airway Pressure Neonatal Respiratory Support
NCT03711565
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Intervention and treatment protocol as described for the two study arms.
Definition of treatment failure (infant meets at least one criterion):
* Sustained pCO2 \>80 mmHg and pH \<7.20 confirmed by arterial or capillary blood gas analysis in spite of optimized non-invasive respiratory support with maximum settings as defined above.
* Fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) \>0.6 to maintain peripheral oxygen saturation as measured by pulse oximetry (SpO2) at 90-94% in spite of optimized non-invasive respiratory support with maximum settings as defined above.
* Reintubation (study patients may be intubated at any time, due to clinical considerations, with or without reaching another criterion of "treatment failure").
Sample size:
Assuming a variability of the paCO2 as previously reported for difficult-to-wean preterm infants in our unit (Czernik C, J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2012) and a treatment failure rate of 22% within 72 hours after extubation, we calculated a sample size of 34 patients in each study arm to detect a difference in the paCO2 of 7 mmHg, using a two-sided significance of 0.05 and a power of 0.8.
Randomization:
Sequence generation by an independent statistician and a study nurse. Block randomization using at least two different block sizes. Allocation concealment using sequentially numbered opaque sealed envelopes.
Data monitoring:
By an independent statistician.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
nHFOV
Immediately after extubation, nHFOV is provided via binasal prongs. Ventilator settings: Frequency set at 10 Hz, I:E ratio 33:66, amplitude 20 cm H2O, Pmean 8 cm H2O, flow 7 l/min. Set FiO2 to maintain SpO2 at 90-94%.
The weaning process is left to the discretion of the attending physician. Maximum amplitude 30 cm H2O, minimum frequency 9 Hz, maximum Pmean 8 cm H2O.
For infants in the nHFOV-group who "fail" nHFOV (see definition below), but do not need immediate reintubation, a non-invasive "Rescue-Treatment" may be provided. The decision to attempt "Rescue-Treatment", the mode of respiratory support and the ventilator settings used are at the discretion of the attending clinician.
nHFOV
Extubation to ventilator-derived nHFOV using binasal prongs
nCPAP
Immediately after extubation, nCPAP is provided via binasal prongs. Ventilator settings: CPAP level set at 8 cm H2O, flow 7 l/min. Set FiO2 to maintain SpO2 at 90-94%.
The weaning process is left to the discretion of the attending physician. Maximum CPAP level 8 cm H2O, maximum flow 8 l/min.
For infants in the nCPAP-group who "fail" nCPAP (see definition below), but do not need immediate reintubation, "Rescue-nHFOV" via binasal prongs may be provided. The decision to attempt "Rescue-nHFOV" and the ventilator settings used are at the discretion of the attending clinician.
nCPAP
Extubation to ventilator-derived nCPAP using binasal prongs
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
nHFOV
Extubation to ventilator-derived nHFOV using binasal prongs
nCPAP
Extubation to ventilator-derived nCPAP using binasal prongs
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Birth weight \<1500 g
* Received mechanical ventilation via an endotracheal tube for ≥120 h
* Caffeine treatment according to unit guidelines
* paCO2 \<65 mmHg with pH \>7.2
* FiO2 25-40% to maintain SpO2 at 90-94%.
* Time-cycled, pressure-controlled ventilation: PIP ≤22 cm H2O, PEEP ≤6 cm H2O; Volume guarantee ventilation: Working Ppeak ≤22 cm H2O, PEEP ≤6 cm H2O; High frequency oscillation ventilation: Pmean ≤12 cm H2O, Amplitude ≤30 cm H2O
* Decision of the attending clinician to extubate
Exclusion Criteria
* Duct-dependent congenital heart disease
* Neuromuscular disease
* Participation in another randomized controlled trial
* Death before reaching the eligibility criteria
* Hydrocortisone treatment at the time of enrolment
* Chronological age \>28 days
5 Days
28 Days
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Charite University, Berlin, Germany
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Christoph Czernik
MD
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Christoph Czernik, MD PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Charite University, Berlin, Germany
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Dpt. of Neonatology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
Berlin, , Germany
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Fischer HS, Buhrer C, Czernik C. Hazards to avoid in future neonatal studies of nasal high-frequency oscillatory ventilation: lessons from an early terminated trial. BMC Res Notes. 2019 Apr 25;12(1):237. doi: 10.1186/s13104-019-4268-2.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
EA2/011/12
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.