Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation(NIPPV) vs Continuous Positive Airway Pressure for Respiratory Distress Syndrome

NCT ID: NCT03226977

Last Updated: 2017-07-24

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

1000 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-08-01

Study Completion Date

2020-07-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

In the past, several studies have compared the effects between nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation(NIPPV) and nasal continuous positive airway pressure(NCPAP) on the incidence of intubation in preterm infants, and the results were inconsistent.The purpose of the present study was to compare NIPPV with NCPAP on the need for endotracheal ventilation and subsequent complications

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

To this day, early use of noninvasive respiratory support strategies has been suggested to be the most effective pathway to reduce those risks. Nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) and nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) are two widely used ways of noninvasive ventilation strategies in preterm infant. As compared with invasive ventilation, NCPAP reduces the risks abnormal neurodevelopment. However, there is only 60% success rate of avoiding intubation in the preterm neonate supported with NCPAP. Supplying with an intermittent peak pressure on NCPAP, NIPPV is considered as a strengthened version of NCPAP with increased flow delivery in the upper airway, increased minute volume and functional residual capacity and recruitment of collapsed alveoli, improved stability of the chest wall and reduced asynchrony of thoraco-abdominal movement,which have been proven to be crucial to decrease the incidences of invasive ventilation and death. However, studies have compared the effects between nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation(NIPPV) and nasal continuous positive airway pressure(NCPAP) on the incidence of intubation in preterm infants, and the results were inconsistent.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

NIPPV

NIPPV is used as a primary mode of ventilation in premature infants with respiratory distress syndrome

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

NIPPV

Intervention Type DEVICE

NIPPV is used as a primary mode of ventilation in premature infants with respiratory distress syndrome

NCPAP

NCPAP is used as a primary mode of ventilation in premature infants with respiratory distress syndrome

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

NCPAP

Intervention Type DEVICE

NCPAP is used as a primary mode of ventilation in premature infants with respiratory distress syndrome

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

NIPPV

NIPPV is used as a primary mode of ventilation in premature infants with respiratory distress syndrome

Intervention Type DEVICE

NCPAP

NCPAP is used as a primary mode of ventilation in premature infants with respiratory distress syndrome

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Gestational age (GA) is from 26 to 37 weeks;
* Diagnosis of RDS. The diagnosis of respiratory distress syndrome(RDS) will be based on clinical manifestations (tachypnea, nasal flaring and or grunting) and chest X-ray findings;
* RDS Silverman score\>5;
* Informed parental consent has been obtained.

Exclusion Criteria

* Severe RDS requiring early intubation according to the American Academy of Pediatrics guidelines for neonatal resuscitation;
* Major congenital malformations or complex congenital heart disease;
* Group B hemolytic streptococcus pneumonia, septicemia, pneumothorax, pulmonary hemorrhage;
* Cardiopulmonary arrest needing prolonged resuscitation;
* Transferred out of the neonatal intensive care unit without treatment.
Minimum Eligible Age

5 Minutes

Maximum Eligible Age

6 Hours

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Guiyang Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Chongqing Maternal and Child Health Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Yan'an Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

The Children's Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Chengdu Women's and Children's Central Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Kunming Children's Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Shanxi Provincial Maternity and Children's Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Children's Hospital of Fudan University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Guangdong Women and Children Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Nanjing Children's Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Jiulongpo No.1 People's Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Daping Hospital and the Research Institute of Surgery of the Third Military Medical University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Ma Juan

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Shi Yuan, PhD,MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Daping Hospital and the Research Institute of Surgery of the Third Military Medical University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Department of Pediatrics, Daping Hospital, Third Military Medical University

Chongqing, Chongqing Municipality, China

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Ma Juan, MD

Role: CONTACT

13508300283

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Juan Ma, physician

Role: primary

18680887330

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

NIPPV of multicenter

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.