Intrapulmonary Percussive Ventilation (IPV) Versus Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Ventilation (nCPAP) in Transient Respiratory Distress of the Newborn
NCT ID: NCT00556738
Last Updated: 2010-05-13
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
100 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2007-11-30
2009-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Tolerance of nHFPV Versus nCPAP in Neonatal Respiratory Distress
NCT02030691
Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation(NIPPV) vs Continuous Positive Airway Pressure for Respiratory Distress Syndrome
NCT03226977
Comparison of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) and Non-Invasive Positive Pressure Ventilation (NIPPV) in Preterm Newborns With Respiratory Distress Syndrome.
NCT06966752
Randomized Trial of Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure or Synchronized Nasal Ventilation in Premature Infants.
NCT00188968
Trial of Non Invasive Ventilation for Respiratoy Distress Syndrome
NCT00821119
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
* Secondary Objective: Comparison between the two groups regarding: Length of oxygen therapy, complications (pneumothorax, pulmonary infections), need for intensive care hospitalization
* Study design: Open, prospective randomized trial.
* Inclusion criteria: Neonates with gestational age ≥ 35 weeks and weight ≥ 2000g, caesarean section, respiratory distress syndrome (modified Silverman score \> 5, SpO2 \< 90%), management within 20 minutes after birth.
* Exclusion criteria: clinical thoracic retraction, congenital lung malformation, meconium aspiration, neonatal infection, other congenital malformations.
* Study plan: After the screening evaluation and written consent document, neonates will be randomized into two groups: nCPAP ventilation or IPV. During the 6 hours after randomization, clinical data will be monitored: cardiac and respiratory frequency (CF -RF), saturation (SaO2), oxygenotherapy, Silverman Score. Then, neonates will be supervised 3 days after normalization of the respiratory distress.
* Number of subjects: 100 (50 in each group)
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
nHFPV
Intrapulmonary Percussive Ventilation
Intrapulmonary Percussive Ventilation
Intrapulmonary Percussive Ventilation
nCPAP
Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure ventilation
Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure ventilation
Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure ventilation
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure ventilation
Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure ventilation
Intrapulmonary Percussive Ventilation
Intrapulmonary Percussive Ventilation
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Gestational age ≥ 35 weeks
* Weight ≥ 2 kg
* SaO2 \< 90% after 10 min of life
* Silverman score ≥ 5
* Treated less than 20 min after birth
* Social security affiliation (parents)
* Informed consent signed (parents)
Exclusion Criteria
* Congenital intrathoracic malformations
* Meconium aspiration
* Early neonatal infections with hemodynamic troubles
* Severe neonatal asphyxia
* Polymalformative syndrome
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University Hospital, Bordeaux
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
University hospital, Bordeaux
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Clothilde Bertrand, Dr
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University Hospital, Bordeaux
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Néonatalogie - Maternité - Hôpital Pellegrin
Bordeaux, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Dumas De La Roque E, Bertrand C, Tandonnet O, Rebola M, Roquand E, Renesme L, Elleau C. Nasal high frequency percussive ventilation versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure in transient tachypnea of the newborn: a pilot randomized controlled trial (NCT00556738). Pediatr Pulmonol. 2011 Mar;46(3):218-23. doi: 10.1002/ppul.21354. Epub 2010 Oct 20.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2007-A00666-47
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: secondary_id
CHUBX 2007/09
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.