Non Invasive Ventilation Versus Continuous Positive Airway Pressure After Extubation of Very Low Birth Weight Infants.
NCT ID: NCT01778829
Last Updated: 2013-01-29
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
PHASE3
220 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2011-12-31
2013-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effects of Two Modalities of Non-invasive Ventilation After Extubation in Very Low Birth Weight Neonates
NCT03551314
Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation During Neonatal Intubation
NCT06549283
Non-invasive Support in Extremely Preterm Infants
NCT02723123
Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation(NIPPV) vs Continuous Positive Airway Pressure for Respiratory Distress Syndrome
NCT03226977
Nasal High Frequency Oscillatory Versus Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation in Neonate After Extubation
NCT02543125
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Exclusion criteria are: major congenital anomalies; presence of cardiovascular instability;intubation less than 2 hours; mechanical ventilation more than 14 days, using muscle relaxant, airway anomalies, consent not provided or refused.
Outcome measures:
The primary outcome was to assess the need for re-intubation within the first 72 hours after extubation in the 2 groups.
The criteria for failure were met by at least 1 of the following:
pH \< 7.25 and PaCO2 \> 65 mmHg; recurrent apnea more than 2 episodes per hour associated with bradycardia; during 4 hour continuous; 2 episodes of apnea that required bagand-mask ventilation in any time during the study; or a PaO2 \< 50 mm Hg with a fraction of inspired oxygen \> 0.6. The secondary outcomes concerning respiratory support were total duration on ETT ventilation, total duration on NCPAP, total duration on supplemental oxygen, incidence of pneumothorax,BPD and dead. Other outcomes included incidence of patent ductus arteriosus (PDA), necrotizing enterocolitis, intraventricular hemorrhage grades 3 and 4, retinopathy of prematurity stage 3, time to full feeds, and length of hospital stay.
Sample size calculations for the primary outcome: We estimated that there would be a more than 80% chance of detecting 43% difference between the groups (alpha 0.05) when samplesize (n) is 110 patients for each mode of treatment.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
CPAP ventilation mode
Once the patient is extubated, CPAP ventilation mode is inmediately administered in order to prevent reintubation
CPAP ventilation mode
Patients are ventilated through a nasal prong coneected to a ventilator that provides a continuous positive airway pressure
NIPPV ventilation mode
NIPPV: Non Invasive Ventilation mode is administered inmediately after extubation to prevent reintubation
NIPPV ventilation mode
Patients are ventilated through a nasal prong connected to a ventilator that provides a non synchronized intermittent positive pressure ventilation
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
CPAP ventilation mode
Patients are ventilated through a nasal prong coneected to a ventilator that provides a continuous positive airway pressure
NIPPV ventilation mode
Patients are ventilated through a nasal prong connected to a ventilator that provides a non synchronized intermittent positive pressure ventilation
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Gestational age less or equal to 34 weeks
* Preterm that meets extubation criteria after at least 2 hours and less than 14 days connected to mechanical ventilation
* Patient receiving methylxanthynes
Exclusion Criteria
* Newborn with congenital cardiopathy
* Newborn with congenital malformation
* Newborn wirh chromosomopathy or genopathic disease
* Newborn with suspected gastrointestinal disease
* Newborn with neuromuscular disease or receiving muscle relaxants
* Lack or informed consent signed by parents or legal representative
2 Hours
14 Days
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Alberto Estay
MD
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Alberto Estay, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Hospital Clinico, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile
Santiago, , Chile
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Alvaro Gonzalez, MD
Role: CONTACT
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Estay AS, Mariani GL, Alvarez CA, Milet B, Agost D, Avila CP, Roldan L, Abdala DA, Keller R, Galletti MF, Gonzalez A; for the NEOCOSUR Neonatal Network. Randomized Controlled Trial of Nonsynchronized Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation versus Nasal CPAP after Extubation of VLBW Infants. Neonatology. 2020;117(2):193-199. doi: 10.1159/000506164. Epub 2020 May 8.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Sa10i20033
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.