Non Invasive Ventilation Versus Continuous Positive Airway Pressure After Extubation of Very Low Birth Weight Infants.

NCT ID: NCT01778829

Last Updated: 2013-01-29

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

220 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-12-31

Study Completion Date

2013-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to determine whether Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) non synchronized is better than continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP)in preventing extubation failure within 72 h, after extubation of very low birth weight infants at the NEOCOSUR Network.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Is a Randomized trial to preterms infants \<1500g and less than 34 weeks with RDS requiring machanical ventilation in the extubation period, randomized to receive NIPPV or NCPAP once extubation criteria were met. Parental written informed consent is required previous extubation. The failure rate is defined as the need for re-intubation and mechanical ventilation).

Exclusion criteria are: major congenital anomalies; presence of cardiovascular instability;intubation less than 2 hours; mechanical ventilation more than 14 days, using muscle relaxant, airway anomalies, consent not provided or refused.

Outcome measures:

The primary outcome was to assess the need for re-intubation within the first 72 hours after extubation in the 2 groups.

The criteria for failure were met by at least 1 of the following:

pH \< 7.25 and PaCO2 \> 65 mmHg; recurrent apnea more than 2 episodes per hour associated with bradycardia; during 4 hour continuous; 2 episodes of apnea that required bagand-mask ventilation in any time during the study; or a PaO2 \< 50 mm Hg with a fraction of inspired oxygen \> 0.6. The secondary outcomes concerning respiratory support were total duration on ETT ventilation, total duration on NCPAP, total duration on supplemental oxygen, incidence of pneumothorax,BPD and dead. Other outcomes included incidence of patent ductus arteriosus (PDA), necrotizing enterocolitis, intraventricular hemorrhage grades 3 and 4, retinopathy of prematurity stage 3, time to full feeds, and length of hospital stay.

Sample size calculations for the primary outcome: We estimated that there would be a more than 80% chance of detecting 43% difference between the groups (alpha 0.05) when samplesize (n) is 110 patients for each mode of treatment.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Neonatal Respiratory Failure

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

CPAP ventilation mode

Once the patient is extubated, CPAP ventilation mode is inmediately administered in order to prevent reintubation

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

CPAP ventilation mode

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Patients are ventilated through a nasal prong coneected to a ventilator that provides a continuous positive airway pressure

NIPPV ventilation mode

NIPPV: Non Invasive Ventilation mode is administered inmediately after extubation to prevent reintubation

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

NIPPV ventilation mode

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Patients are ventilated through a nasal prong connected to a ventilator that provides a non synchronized intermittent positive pressure ventilation

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

CPAP ventilation mode

Patients are ventilated through a nasal prong coneected to a ventilator that provides a continuous positive airway pressure

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

NIPPV ventilation mode

Patients are ventilated through a nasal prong connected to a ventilator that provides a non synchronized intermittent positive pressure ventilation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Preterm with a weight less than 1501 g
* Gestational age less or equal to 34 weeks
* Preterm that meets extubation criteria after at least 2 hours and less than 14 days connected to mechanical ventilation
* Patient receiving methylxanthynes

Exclusion Criteria

* Patient more than 14 days in mechanical ventilation
* Newborn with congenital cardiopathy
* Newborn with congenital malformation
* Newborn wirh chromosomopathy or genopathic disease
* Newborn with suspected gastrointestinal disease
* Newborn with neuromuscular disease or receiving muscle relaxants
* Lack or informed consent signed by parents or legal representative
Minimum Eligible Age

2 Hours

Maximum Eligible Age

14 Days

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Alberto Estay

MD

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Alberto Estay, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Hospital Clinico, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile

Santiago, , Chile

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Chile

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Alberto Estay, MD

Role: CONTACT

56223546437

Alvaro Gonzalez, MD

Role: CONTACT

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Alberto Estay, MD

Role: primary

Alvaro Gonzalez, MD

Role: backup

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Estay AS, Mariani GL, Alvarez CA, Milet B, Agost D, Avila CP, Roldan L, Abdala DA, Keller R, Galletti MF, Gonzalez A; for the NEOCOSUR Neonatal Network. Randomized Controlled Trial of Nonsynchronized Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation versus Nasal CPAP after Extubation of VLBW Infants. Neonatology. 2020;117(2):193-199. doi: 10.1159/000506164. Epub 2020 May 8.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 32388511 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Sa10i20033

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Non-invasive Ventilation
NCT07186790 NOT_YET_RECRUITING