Comparing Bubble and Ventilator Nasal CPAP in Preterm Infants

NCT ID: NCT02003846

Last Updated: 2015-06-30

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

18 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-11-30

Study Completion Date

2014-10-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

There are various methods to generate the pressure needed for Nasal CPAP. Some neonatal intensive care units (NICU) use an underwater bubbling system and others use a ventilator to generate the pressure. There is no right or wrong way to generate the pressure and both methods are approved and accepted.

The aim of this study is to compare the two systems of Nasal CPAP by placing the baby on each for a defined time period and reviewing the infant's vital signs. The investigators expect that the pressure generated by bubble CPAP will be better and lead to improved vital signs.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

There are various methods to generate the pressure needed for Nasal CPAP. Some neonatal intensive care units (NICU) use an underwater bubbling system and others use a ventilator to generate the pressure. There is no right or wrong way to generate the pressure and both methods are approved and accepted.

The aim of this study is to compare the two systems of Nasal CPAP by placing the baby on each for a defined time period and reviewing the infant's vital signs. The investigators expect that the pressure generated by bubble CPAP will be better and lead to improved vital signs.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Premature infant

Each premature infant will be on bubble nasal CPAP for 2 hours and on ventilator nasal CPAP for 2 hours

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Neonates between 26-32 weeks gestational age who have been on Nasal CPAP for at least 48hrs on fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) of \< or = 0.3. Parental consent will be obtained prior to enrollment.

Exclusion Criteria

* Infants with severe congenital anomalies, such as airway or chest wall deformities, pulmonary hypoplasia, congenital heart disease, neurologic abnormalities including severe intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) and need for surgery eg. for necrotizing enterocolitis will be excluded from the study. Any infants with genetic/chromosomal abnormalities will be excluded.
Minimum Eligible Age

2 Days

Maximum Eligible Age

3 Months

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Maimonides Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Shantanu Rastogi

Attending Neonatologist

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Shantanu Rastogi, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Maimonides Medical Center

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Maimonides Medical Center

Brooklyn, New York, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Gregory GA, Kitterman JA, Phibbs RH, Tooley WH, Hamilton WK. Treatment of the idiopathic respiratory-distress syndrome with continuous positive airway pressure. N Engl J Med. 1971 Jun 17;284(24):1333-40. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197106172842401. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 4930602 (View on PubMed)

Lee KS, Dunn MS, Fenwick M, Shennan AT. A comparison of underwater bubble continuous positive airway pressure with ventilator-derived continuous positive airway pressure in premature neonates ready for extubation. Biol Neonate. 1998;73(2):69-75. doi: 10.1159/000013962.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 9483299 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

MMC 2013-02-10

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

MMC 2013-02-10

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id