Randomized Trial Investigating Four Nasal CPAP Systems in the Management of Apnea of Prematurity

NCT ID: NCT00482040

Last Updated: 2007-08-24

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

16 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2004-03-31

Study Completion Date

2006-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate four different nasal continuous pressure systems, which are usually applied on our neonatal intensive care unit, with regard of their effect on bradycardia and desaturations in preterm infants.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

BACKGROUND:

Apnea of prematurity (AOP) is a common problem in preterm infants. Nasal respiratory support using either Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) or Intermittent Mandatory Ventilation (IMV) are, among others, widely used treatments. Which of the different systems is the most efficient, however, is unclear.

OBJECTIVE:

Efficiency of different CPAP systems on reducing the cumulative percentage of bradycardia and desaturation in preterm infants.

METHODS:

In a prospective, randomized, cross-over trial 32 preterm infants Infants will randomly allocated to receive nasal CPAP delivered by one of the following sys-tems: (1) a conventional IMV-System (Stephanie, Stephan GmbH, Germany with PIP 15 cmH2O, RR 10/min) delivering CPAP via short binasal prongs (Hudson RCI, USA); (2) the Infant-Flow-System (EME Ltd, Great Britain) with CPAP delivery via short binasal prongs; (3) the Infant-Flow-AdvanceTM-System used in the pressure assist mode with PIP 10 cmH2O, RR 10/min; and (4) a nasal underwater bubble CPAP with application via binasal prongs (Hudson RCI, USA).

All systems will be adjusted to achieve an approximate PEEP of 6 cm H2O. Each study lasts 24 hours, during which chest wall and abdominal movements, SaO2, tcPCO2, ECG, esopha-gus pressure and CPAP-/IMV-pressure will be recorded continuously. Infants will be studied in room air in a 15° head tilt prone position while being treated with caffeine (3mg/kg/d).

PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE Cumulative percentage of bradycardia (heart rate \<80/min) and desaturation (SaO2 \<80%) per hour.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Apnea of Prematurity CPAP

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Stephanie (TM), Infant Flow (TM), Infant Flow advance (TM), Bubble CPAP

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* gestational age at birth \< 34 weeks
* postconceptional age and body weight at study ≤38 week and \>1000 g
* requirement for N-CPAP to treat AOP as judged by the attending neonatologist

Exclusion Criteria

* congenital or chromosomal abnormalities
* acute infections
* intraventricular hemorrhage
* additional inspired oxygen to maintain pulse oximeter saturation SpO2 \>92%
* patent ductus arteriosus
Maximum Eligible Age

14 Weeks

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Hospital Tuebingen

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Tobias Pantalitschka, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University children´s hospital Tuebingen

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CPAP-I-Study

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id