MAKE IT CLEAN, Impact of Pocket Revision on the Rate of Infection and Other Complications in Patients Requiring Pocket Manipulation for Generator Replacement and/or Lead Replacement or Revision: A Prospective Randomized Study

NCT ID: NCT00599261

Last Updated: 2013-01-10

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

265 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2008-01-31

Study Completion Date

2012-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

To determine the effect of scar tissue removal on the rate of infection and any other complications such as bleeding in patients with an ICD or pacemaker who have the device generator or leads replaced or repositioned.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This is a randomized, prospective, single-blind study that evaluates the effect of removal of scar tissue during pacemaker/ICD pocket revision on infection and complications. Subjects will be randomly assigned to either removal of the scar tissue surrounding the implanted device during device replacement or to device replacement without removal of this tissue. Subjects will be followed for one year post-procedure for the occurrence of infection, bleeding/hematoma, or other complications.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Infection

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

1

Removal of the fibrotic pocket surrounding the generator and leads

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

ICD/pacemaker pocket revision

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Pocket revision consists of complete removal of the fibrous capsule surrounding the device and leads

2

Tissue is not removed

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

ICD/pacemaker pocket revision

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Pocket revision consists of complete removal of the fibrous capsule surrounding the device and leads

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

ICD/pacemaker pocket revision

Pocket revision consists of complete removal of the fibrous capsule surrounding the device and leads

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Age 18 years or greater
2. Willingness to provide written informed consent
3. Subjects presenting for any of the following:

1. pacemaker/ICD generator change
2. pacemaker/ICD lead replacement
3. pacemaker/ICD lead revision
4. pacemaker/ICD upgrades

Exclusion Criteria

1. Age less than 18 years
2. Unwillingness to provide written informed consent
3. Subjects unable to give consent
4. Pregnant or nursing women
5. Patients who have undergone pocket revision or manipulation less than 365 days prior
6. Patients who have undergone pacemaker or ICD implantation less than 365 days prior
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Dhanunjaya Lakkireddy, MD, FACC

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Dhanunjaya Lakkireddy, MD, FACC

Associate Professor of Medicine

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Dhanunjaya Lakkireddy, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Kansas Medical Center

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Kansas Hospital

Kansas City, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Lakkireddy D, Pillarisetti J, Atkins D, Biria M, Reddy M, Murray C, Bommana S, Shanberg D, Adabala N, Pimentel R, Dendi R, Emert M, Vacek J, Dawn B, Berenbom L. IMpact of pocKet rEvision on the rate of InfecTion and other CompLications in patients rEquiring pocket mAnipulation for generator replacement and/or lead replacement or revisioN (MAKE IT CLEAN): A prospective randomized study. Heart Rhythm. 2015 May;12(5):950-6. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2015.01.035. Epub 2015 Jan 24.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 25625720 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

10995

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.