Lead Extraction With Manual Traction

NCT ID: NCT07023900

Last Updated: 2025-06-17

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

130 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-01-01

Study Completion Date

2023-05-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The number of implantable cardiac rhythm devices is increasing. As a result, the number of patients requiring lead extraction is increasing. In this study, authors aimed to present their experience with lead extraction using manual traction.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Objectives: The number of implantable cardiac rhythm devices is increasing. As a result, the number of patients requiring lead extraction is increasing. In this study, authors aimed to present our experience with lead extraction using manual traction.

Methods: Patients (n=130) who underwent lead extraction by manual traction without the use of lead extraction devices (extraction sheaths, locking stylets, etc.) manufactured for extraction at our hospital between 2016 and 2021 were reviewed. Patient characteristics, indications for extraction, procedural success, complications, and mortality were evaluated.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pacemaker Lead Dysfunction Manual Traction

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

OTHER

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Manual traction

The pacemaker or ICD lead extraction with manually.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients, who underwent transvenous lead extraction manually
* Patients, who had lead and device types

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients, who underwent transvenous lead extraction with extraction device
* Patients, who had not baseline characteristics
* Patients, who had not procedure detail
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Bursa Postgraduate Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Hasan ARI

Prof. Dr.

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Kusumoto FM, Schoenfeld MH, Wilkoff BL, Berul CI, Birgersdotter-Green UM, Carrillo R, Cha YM, Clancy J, Deharo JC, Ellenbogen KA, Exner D, Hussein AA, Kennergren C, Krahn A, Lee R, Love CJ, Madden RA, Mazzetti HA, Moore JC, Parsonnet J, Patton KK, Rozner MA, Selzman KA, Shoda M, Srivathsan K, Strathmore NF, Swerdlow CD, Tompkins C, Wazni O. 2017 HRS expert consensus statement on cardiovascular implantable electronic device lead management and extraction. Heart Rhythm. 2017 Dec;14(12):e503-e551. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2017.09.001. Epub 2017 Sep 15. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28919379 (View on PubMed)

Bongiorni MG, Burri H, Deharo JC, Starck C, Kennergren C, Saghy L, Rao A, Tascini C, Lever N, Kutarski A, Fernandez Lozano I, Strathmore N, Costa R, Epstein L, Love C, Blomstrom-Lundqvist C; ESC Scientific Document Group. 2018 EHRA expert consensus statement on lead extraction: recommendations on definitions, endpoints, research trial design, and data collection requirements for clinical scientific studies and registries: endorsed by APHRS/HRS/LAHRS. Europace. 2018 Jul 1;20(7):1217. doi: 10.1093/europace/euy050. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29566158 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

BursaPH Lead

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.