Assessment of Appropriate ICD Implantation for Primary Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death
NCT ID: NCT00926159
Last Updated: 2011-08-04
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
549 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2008-03-31
2010-11-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Standard Drug Therapy vs. Implanted Defibrillator for Primary Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death
NCT00524862
Efficacy of Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator in Patients With Non-ischemic Systolic Heart Failure on Mortality
NCT00541268
Efficacy and Safety of Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator (ICD) Implantation in the Elderly
NCT02121158
Study of the Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD) Intracardiac Electrograms
NCT00916435
Prospective Observational Study of the ICD in Sudden Cardiac Death Prevention
NCT00733590
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Since the approval of expanded coverage for primary prevention by CMS along with the requirement for registry participation in early 2005, the ICD implant volume did not show an apparent increase as expected by many. Instead, a flat growth of ICD sales has been observed over the last 2 years. Several explanations have been offered by various sources. Some attribute the slow growth to the loss of confidence among the referring physicians, patients, and family members as the result of the multiple industry recalls. Others claim that only a small portion of the eligible candidates receive ICD therapy because of poor awareness of the ICD benefit among the referring physicians and the public (the Cambridge Heart Commercial). However, the Medtronic campaign to promote public awareness has had little impact on the volume of ICD implants. Another group of people suspect that the cardiologists have not paid enough attention to the patients' candidacy for ICD therapy because they tend to focus on the patients' ongoing symptoms not proactive prevention. Thus,an active screening program may identify a significant number of patients who will benefit from ICD therapy. However, there has been no comprehensive study that has evaluated the impact of active screening on the ICD implant volume, the percentage of eligible ICD patients without ICDs and the reasons for not receiving ICDs.
Majority of ICD implants in the United States are currently performed in the community-based cardiology programs. Thus a proactive program to identify ICD candidates in a community-based program may provide a good assessment on the unrealized potential benefit of ICDs for primary prevention of sudden cardiac death.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_ONLY
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
ICD eligible
Patients with Ejection Fraction (EF) of 35% or less as determined by cardiac echocardiogram or cardiac nuclear scan.
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Ejection fraction of 35% or less by echocardiogram and/or cardiac nuclear scan
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients currently enrolled in a clinical trial that would be impacted by receipt of an ICD
* Pregnant women
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Boston Scientific Corporation
INDUSTRY
University of Minnesota Physicians Heart at Fairview
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
University of Minnesota Physicians
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Huagui Li, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Minnesota Physicians, Minnesota Heart Clinic
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Version # 3, December 4, 2009
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.