Efficacy and Safety of Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator (ICD) Implantation in the Elderly

NCT ID: NCT02121158

Last Updated: 2024-07-31

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

167 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-08-07

Study Completion Date

2020-11-06

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The overall aim of this trial is to study the safety and efficacy of ICD implantation as a primary prevention strategy of sudden cardiac death in patients 70 years and older. This study will assess the many competing factors involved with ICD implantation including 1) the impact on mortality, especially in the context of a declining rate of sudden death with advanced age, 2) the tolerability of the powerful therapeutic action of the device, and 3) the impact on quality of life.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The overall aim of this trial is to study the safety and efficacy of ICD implantation as a primary prevention strategy of sudden cardiac death (SCD) in patients 70 years and older. In particular, this study is designed to determine the comparative effectiveness of ICD, in addition to optimal medical therapy (OMT), in reducing all-cause mortality, versus OMT alone; OMT includes standard intervention for chronic heart failure patients, i.e. lifestyle modification, disease management, adoption of healthy diet and exercise practices, etcetera. One particularly important secondary objective is to assess treatment efficacy under the conditions of high versus low co-morbidity burden.

Participants will be randomized (1:1 ratio) to ICD + OMT or OMT alone, and stratified by participating site and co-morbidity level (Charlson score \<3 versus 3+). Acute treatment visits will occur as clinically indicated and per local convention; follow-up will occur 1-4 months post-randomization (all participants), and not sooner than 30 days - and not later than 120 days post-implantation (ICD arm); regular follow-up will occur at 6 month intervals post-randomization until study close (all participants). All follow-up will be conducted centrally. Neither the participant nor treating clinician will be masked to treatment.

Primary Objective:

The primary objective of this study is to determine if a primary prevention strategy with ICD implantation in addition to optimal medical therapy (OMT) is effective in reducing all-cause mortality compared to OMT alone in patients 70 years of age and older who are eligible for ICD therapy according to current Centers for Medicare \& Medicaid Services (CMS) criteria.

Primary Hypothesis:

The primary hypothesis of this study is that implantation of an ICD plus optimal medical therapy will reduce all-cause mortality in patients 70 years of age and older versus optimal medical therapy alone.

Secondary Objectives:

1. One secondary objective of this study is to ascertain whether age, co-morbidity burden, or age and burden together, are determinants in mortality outcomes in the OMT versus ICD + OMT group.
2. An additional secondary objective of the study is to determine the effect of ICD implantation plus optimal medical therapy on quality of life among elderly patients compared with optimal medical therapy alone.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cardiomyopathy Coronary Artery Disease Congestive Heart Failure Myocardial Infarction

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

1

ICD implantation in addition to Optimal Medical Therapy

Group Type OTHER

Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator

Intervention Type DEVICE

The ICD and lead(s) will be FDA-approved.

2

Optimal Medical Therapy

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Optimal Medical Therapy

Intervention Type OTHER

Guidance on lifestyle modification, exercise training, and disease management including review of American Heart Association (AHA) Guidelines for Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease and Stroke.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator

The ICD and lead(s) will be FDA-approved.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Optimal Medical Therapy

Guidance on lifestyle modification, exercise training, and disease management including review of American Heart Association (AHA) Guidelines for Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease and Stroke.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. 70 years of age or older
2. Eligible for ICD implementation according to the CMS criteria for primary prevention by one of the following conditions:

1. Documented prior MI and a measured left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) \<=30% (includes New York Heart Association \[NYHA\] class I, II, or III)
2. Coronary artery disease with a documented prior MI, a measured left ventricular ejection fraction \<=35%, and inducible, sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF) at electrophysiology (EP) study
3. Ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (IDCM), documented prior MI, NYHA class II and III heart failure, and measured LVEF \<=35%
4. Non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (NIDCM) \> 3 months, NYHA Class II and III heart failure, and measured LVEF \<=35%
3. Stable condition on Optimal Medical Therapy
4. Able and willing to provide informed consent to participate in this study

Exclusion Criteria

1. Enrolled in or planning to enroll in a conflicting trial
2. Receiving a bi-ventricular ICD device
3. New York Heart Association class IV heart failure
4. Cardiogenic shock or symptomatic hypotension while in stable baseline rhythm,
5. Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) or percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) within the past 3 months
6. An MI within the past 40 days
7. Clinical symptoms or findings that would make them a candidate for coronary revascularization
8. Irreversible brain damage from pre-existing cerebral disease
9. Any disease other than cardiac disease (e.g. cancer, uremia, liver failure), associated with a likelihood of survival less than 1 year
10. Circumstance that would prevent completion of the trial and follow-up activities, including medical condition
Minimum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

VA Office of Research and Development

FED

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Steve Singh, MD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Washington DC VA Medical Center, Washington, DC

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Washington DC VA Medical Center, Washington, DC

Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States

Site Status

North Florida/South Georgia Veterans Health System, Gainesville, FL

Gainesville, Florida, United States

Site Status

Minneapolis VA Health Care System, Minneapolis, MN

Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR

Portland, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Tennessee Valley Healthcare System Nashville Campus, Nashville, TN

Nashville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Singh SN, Wininger M, Raitt M, Adabag S, Moore H, Rottman JN, Scrymgeour A, Zhang J, Zheng K, Guarino P, Kyriakides TC; I-70 Study Group; Johnson G, Williams A, Beed A, MacMurdy K, Saavedra P. Efficacy and safety of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation in the elderly-The I-70 Study: A randomized clinical trial. Heart Rhythm O2. 2024 Apr 27;5(6):365-373. doi: 10.1016/j.hroo.2024.04.010. eCollection 2024 Jun.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 38984364 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan, and Informed Consent Form

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

592

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Assessment of Combined CCM and ICD Device in HFrEF
NCT05855135 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA