TRAjectories and CLinical ExpeRiences of ICD Therapy Study
NCT ID: NCT05116176
Last Updated: 2025-07-16
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
500 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2021-12-15
2026-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A PRospective, rAndomizEd Comparison of subcuTaneOous and tRansvenous ImplANtable Cardioverter Defibrillator Therapy
NCT01296022
Efficacy and Safety of Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator (ICD) Implantation in the Elderly
NCT02121158
Efficacy of Implantable Defibrillator Therapy After a Myocardial Infarction
NCT00673842
Clinical Investigation of the Medtronic EnTrust™ Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD), Model D153ATG
NCT00273195
Subcutaneous Implantable Defibrillator (S-ICD) System - CE Clinical Investigation
NCT01117792
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The specific aims, applicable methods, and main hypotheses of the TRACER-ICD study are as follows:
Aim 1: To characterize the clinical course of patients aged \>65 after ICD implantation by establishing a multicenter prospective cohort (N=500). Baseline (verbal and in-person) and quarterly (phone, electronic health records \[EHR\], remote monitoring) data collected up to 18 months or death will include: a. geriatric assessments (e.g. frailty, cognition,1 functional status; b. comorbidities; c. quality of life and symptom burden; d. health services use; e. SDM history; and f. ICD-recorded physical activity (minutes/day).
Factors associated with death and poor quality of life will be identified. Group-based trajectory modeling will identify patient clusters with distinct trajectories of functional status and quality of life following ICD implantation.
H1: A model integrating frailty and clinical factors will predict (a) death, (b) poor quality of life, and (c) unfavorable functional trajectories after ICD implantation.
Aim 2: To validate a personalized prediction model of treatment outcomes of ICDs. We will apply our established semi-competing risks approach5 to the prospective cohort, enriched by the baseline geriatric assessments, to predict individual patients' probabilities of the following outcome profiles at 6, 12, and 18 months post-implant: a. death without prior shock, b. death with prior shock, c. survival without prior shock, and d. survival with prior shock. The independent contribution of frailty, cognitive dysfunction, baseline quality of life, and functional status (e.g. total deficits in ADL and IADL) to model performance will be evaluated.
H2: Addition of frailty, cognitive dysfunction, quality of life, and functional status to a model with cardiovascular variables will significantly improve model performance as assessed by area under the curve (AUC).
Aim 3: To identify optimal strategies for incorporating personalized outcome profiles into SDM. The main cohort's baseline interview and EHR review will provide quantitative data on past SDM tools used by physicians. We will develop a prototype individualized version of the Colorado SDM tool that incorporates 18-month outcome profiles using our semi-competing risk model. We will perform semi-structured interviews of cardiologists (N=20) as well as patients (N=20) recruited from the main cohort regarding process mapping of SDM from clinic to implant procedure, including timing, content, format preferences, and impressions of the prototype individualized tool.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators
500 patients age \>65 receiving new primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs).
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Participation in another investigational drug or intervention trial expected to influence any of the outcomes of interest in this study
3. Current drug or alcohol use or dependence that, in the opinion of the Site Principle Investigator, would interfere with adherence to study requirements.
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Pennsylvania
OTHER
Hebrew SeniorLife
OTHER
University of Colorado, Denver
OTHER
Emory University
OTHER
Mayo Clinic
OTHER
Saint Luke's Health System
OTHER
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Daniel B. Kramer
Assistant Professor of Medicine
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Daniel B Kramer, MD, MPH
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2021P000054
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.