Combined Use of BIOTRONIK Home Monitoring and Predefined Anticoagulation to Reduce Stroke Risk

NCT ID: NCT00559988

Last Updated: 2017-12-05

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

2718 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2008-02-29

Study Completion Date

2013-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The IMPACT Study will investigate the potential clinical benefit of the combined use of BIOTRONIK Home Monitoring (HM) technology and a predefined anticoagulation plan compared to conventional device evaluation and physician-directed anticoagulation in patients with implanted dual-chamber defibrillators or cardiac resynchronization therapy devices.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) and atrial flutter (AFL) are common cardiac arrhythmias associated with an increased incidence of stroke in patients with additional risk factors. Oral Anticoagulation (OAC) reduces stroke risk, but because these arrhythmias are frequently intermittent and asymptomatic, start of OAC therapy is often delayed until electrocardiographic documentation is obtained.

Technological advances in implanted dual-chamber cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) or cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (CRT-D) devices allow early detection and real time verification of AF/AFL with intracardiac electrograms (IEGM) automatically transmitted to the clinicians. Such remote diagnostic capability might be particularly relevant in patients with asymptomatic AF by allowing timely treatment. Compared to conventional periodic, (e.g., quarterly) office device evaluation, daily remote monitoring may prove superior for diagnosis of AF and prophylactic treatment of thromboembolism.

The start, stop and restart of OAC based on a predefined atrial rhythm-guided strategy in conjunction with a standard risk-stratification scheme could lead to better clinical outcomes compared with conventional clinical care. The study is designed to demonstrate a risk reduction of both thromboembolism proximate to episodes of documented AF/AFL and bleeding potentiated by chronic OAC in the absence of AF. Verification of this premise would impact the clinical practice, providing evidence to physicians for the use of HM to guide OAC in patients with AF/AFL. The results of this study should demonstrate the clinical value of wireless remote surveillance of the cardiac rhythm and may define the critical threshold of AF/AFL burden warranting OAC or antiarrhythmic drug therapy in patients at risk of stroke

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Atrial Fibrillation Atrial Flutter Stroke Embolism, Systemic Arterial Major Bleeding

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Implanted Cardioverter Defibrillator Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Defibrillator Home Monitoring Oral Anticoagulation

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Home Monitoring Guided OAC

Home Monitoring is fully enabled and continuous remote surveillance data is available to investigators. Patients will be treated according to a predefined anticoagulation plan, which uses the total duration of AF/AFL combined with patients' CHADS2 score to determine the start, stop, and restart of OAC.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Home Monitoring Guided OAC

Intervention Type DRUG

Active monitoring for atrial episodes through the automatic HM notifications (email, fax, short message service) is required. If the total duration over 48 consecutive hours reaches the predefined anticoagulation condition, and AF/AFL diagnosis is confirmed using the IEGM online, the site instructs the patient by telephone to start OAC. Clinicians continue to monitor patients using HM, and if freedom from AF/AFL reaches the predefined interval, stop of OAC therapy is requested over the telephone. Following stop of anticoagulation, any recurrence of AF/AFL requires restart of OAC therapy.

OAC drugs used: Dabigatran etexilate, Rivaroxaban, Warfarin, other approved VKA

Physician-Directed OAC

In Control (Group 2), Home Monitoring is active for Safety Net alerts, but the remote AF/AFL data is not revealed to the patient or treating physician. These patients receive physician-directed OAC consistent with current standards of care.

Safety Net data include:

* ERI/EOS
* Special Implant Status
* Implant in Backup Mode (ROM)
* VT/ VF Detection Inactive
* Emergency Pacing
* 250 Ω \> RV Pacing Impedance \> 1500 Ω
* Symptomatic VT/VF therapies including both ATP and shock
* VT/VF storm
* HM transmission failure \>3 days

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Physician-Directed OAC

Intervention Type DRUG

Patients will receive physician-directed anticoagulation therapy based on conventional criteria.

OAC drugs used: Dabigatran etexilate, Rivaroxaban, Warfarin, other approved VKA

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Home Monitoring Guided OAC

Active monitoring for atrial episodes through the automatic HM notifications (email, fax, short message service) is required. If the total duration over 48 consecutive hours reaches the predefined anticoagulation condition, and AF/AFL diagnosis is confirmed using the IEGM online, the site instructs the patient by telephone to start OAC. Clinicians continue to monitor patients using HM, and if freedom from AF/AFL reaches the predefined interval, stop of OAC therapy is requested over the telephone. Following stop of anticoagulation, any recurrence of AF/AFL requires restart of OAC therapy.

OAC drugs used: Dabigatran etexilate, Rivaroxaban, Warfarin, other approved VKA

Intervention Type DRUG

Physician-Directed OAC

Patients will receive physician-directed anticoagulation therapy based on conventional criteria.

OAC drugs used: Dabigatran etexilate, Rivaroxaban, Warfarin, other approved VKA

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Candidates for implantation of, or already implanted with, a BIOTRONIK Lumax HF-T or DR-T device
* Documented P wave mean amplitude ≥ 1.0 mV (sinus rhythm) or ≥ 0.5 mV (AF) at enrollment, if previously implanted
* CHADS2 risk score ≥ 1
* Able and willing to follow OAC therapy if the indication develops during the course of the trial
* Able to utilize the HM throughout the study

Exclusion Criteria

* Permanent AF
* History of stroke, transient ischemic attack (TIA) or systemic embolism and documented AF or AFL
* Currently requiring OAC therapy for any indication
* Patients who underwent successful AF ablation (sinus rhythm restored) and have not completed a minimum of 3 months of OAC therapy
* Known, current contraindication to use of eligible OAC
* Long QT or Brugada syndrome as the sole indication for device implantation
* Life expectancy less than the expected term of the study
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Biotronik, Inc.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jonathan L Halperin, M.D.

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, NY

John Ip, M.D.

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Thoracic & Cardiovascular Healthcare Foundation, Lansing, MI

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Ridgewood, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Durham, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Hickory, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Kettering, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Middletown, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Toledo, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Westlake, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Tulsa, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Tualatin, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Abington, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Phoenixville, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Greenville, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Rock Hill, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Cookeville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Germantown, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Nashville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Corpus Christi, Texas, United States

Site Status

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Humble, Texas, United States

Site Status

Kingwood, Texas, United States

Site Status

Wahroonga, , Australia

Site Status

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Aarhus, , Denmark

Site Status

Tübingen, , Germany

Site Status

Villingen, , Germany

Site Status

Birmingham, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Scottsdale, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Anaheim, California, United States

Site Status

Fremont, California, United States

Site Status

Santa Barbara, California, United States

Site Status

Torrance, California, United States

Site Status

Ventura, California, United States

Site Status

Aurora, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Boulder, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Newark, Delaware, United States

Site Status

Davenport, Florida, United States

Site Status

Daytona Beach, Florida, United States

Site Status

Kissimmee, Florida, United States

Site Status

Melbourne, Florida, United States

Site Status

Sarasota, Florida, United States

Site Status

St. Petersburg, Florida, United States

Site Status

Zephyrhills, Florida, United States

Site Status

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Elk Grove Village, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Maywood, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Fort Wayne, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Valparaiso, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Shawnee Mission, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Lexington, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Louisville, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Owensboro, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Hammond, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Lafayette, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

New Orleans, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Bangor, Maine, United States

Site Status

Lewiston, Maine, United States

Site Status

Cumberland, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Burlington, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Worcester, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Bay City, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Lansing, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Lapeer, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Saginaw, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Ypsilanti, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Tupelo, Mississippi, United States

Site Status

Kansas City, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Osage Beach, Missouri, United States

Site Status

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Omaha, Nebraska, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Australia Canada Denmark Germany United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Martin DT, Bersohn MM, Waldo AL, Wathen MS, Choucair WK, Lip GY, Ip J, Holcomb R, Akar JG, Halperin JL; IMPACT Investigators. Randomized trial of atrial arrhythmia monitoring to guide anticoagulation in patients with implanted defibrillator and cardiac resynchronization devices. Eur Heart J. 2015 Jul 7;36(26):1660-8. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv115. Epub 2015 Apr 23.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 25908774 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

IMPACT

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id