Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
4231 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2008-01-31
2013-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Compression Only CPR Versus Standard CPR in Out-Of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest - A Randomized Survival Study
NCT03981107
Continuous Chest Compressions vs AHA Standard CPR of 30:2
NCT01372748
Compression Only-CPR Versus Standard-CPR
NCT02401633
Automated Chest Compression in Cardiac Arrest
NCT00641069
Standard CPR Versus Chest Compressions Only
NCT04569812
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
1
Mechanical CPR with AutoPulse
AutoPulse
Mechanical device that provides chest compression
2
Manual CPR
Manual
Manual chest compression
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
AutoPulse
Mechanical device that provides chest compression
Manual
Manual chest compression
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Exclusion Criteria
* Arrest due to exsanguinations, strangulation, smoke inhalation, drug overdose, electrocution, hanging, drowning.
* Known or clinically apparent pregnancy
* Do Not Attempt to Resuscitate (DNAR) orders
* Apparent patient weight more than 225 kg (500 lbs)
* Wards of the state
* Prisoner
* CPR device other than AutoPulse
* Patients who are reached after 16 minutes after the time of emergency call (911). This exclusion is determined at the time of CRF abstraction, not during treatment of the patient.
* These criteria will be determined in the best estimation of the rescue personnel, or if the AutoPulse signals that the patient is outside the parameters for AutoPulse deployment.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Ullevaal University Hospital
OTHER
Zoll Medical Corporation
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Lars Wik, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Ullevaal University Hospital
David Persse, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Houston Fire
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Hillsborough Fire Rescue
Tampa, Florida, United States
Houston Fire
Houston, Texas, United States
Gold Cross EMS
Menasha, Wisconsin, United States
Vienna EMS
Vienna, , Austria
Nijmegen EMS
Nijmegen, , Netherlands
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Olsen JA, Brunborg C, Steinberg M, Persse D, Sterz F, Lozano M Jr, Westfall M, van Grunsven PM, Lerner EB, Wik L. Survival to hospital discharge with biphasic fixed 360 joules versus 200 escalating to 360 joules defibrillation strategies in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest of presumed cardiac etiology. Resuscitation. 2019 Mar;136:112-118. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2019.01.020. Epub 2019 Jan 29.
Wik L, Olsen JA, Persse D, Sterz F, Lozano M Jr, Brouwer MA, Westfall M, Souders CM, Travis DT, Herken UR, Lerner EB. Why do some studies find that CPR fraction is not a predictor of survival? Resuscitation. 2016 Jul;104:59-62. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2016.04.013. Epub 2016 May 4.
Steinberg MT, Olsen JA, Brunborg C, Persse D, Sterz F, Lozano M Jr, Brouwer MA, Westfall M, Souders CM, van Grunsven PM, Travis DT, Lerner EB, Wik L. Minimizing pre-shock chest compression pauses in a cardiopulmonary resuscitation cycle by performing an earlier rhythm analysis. Resuscitation. 2015 Feb;87:33-7. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2014.11.012. Epub 2014 Nov 21.
Wik L, Olsen JA, Persse D, Sterz F, Lozano M Jr, Brouwer MA, Westfall M, Souders CM, Malzer R, van Grunsven PM, Travis DT, Whitehead A, Herken UR, Lerner EB. Manual vs. integrated automatic load-distributing band CPR with equal survival after out of hospital cardiac arrest. The randomized CIRC trial. Resuscitation. 2014 Jun;85(6):741-8. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2014.03.005. Epub 2014 Mar 15.
Lerner EB, Persse D, Souders CM, Sterz F, Malzer R, Lozano M Jr, Westfall M, Brouwer MA, van Grunsven PM, Whitehead A, Olsen JA, Herken UR, Wik L. Design of the Circulation Improving Resuscitation Care (CIRC) Trial: a new state of the art design for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest research. Resuscitation. 2011 Mar;82(3):294-9. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2010.11.013. Epub 2010 Dec 31.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Zoll-0100
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.