Artificial Root-End Barriers

NCT ID: NCT00595842

Last Updated: 2012-03-08

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

10 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2007-02-28

Study Completion Date

2008-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study retrospectively looks to determine the clinical success of ProRoot MTA used as an artificial apical barrier in teeth with immature apices.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The normal development and maturation of a root depends on a vital, healthy pulp. If the pulp becomes necrotic in a tooth with an immature apex, endodontic treatment can be performed using an artificial barrier technique. Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) has become the material of choice to accomplish this procedure, however, few studies have evaluated its clinical success. The purpose of this retrospective study was to determine the clinical success of ProRoot MTA used as an artificial apical barrier. Twenty patients were included in this study. After approximately one week of Ca(OH)2 treatment, each patient had MTA placed as an apical barrier in a tooth with a single canal and open apex followed by placement of a final restoration. Patients were recalled and evaluated for clinical signs and symptoms and osseous healing. Immediate post-treatment and recall radiographs were evaluated by two endodontists calibrated for use of the Periapical Index (PAI).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Dental Cements Tooth Abnormalities

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_ONLY

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Group one

Subjects are drawn from a search of all patients treated with MTA between ages 5-40

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* a tooth with a single canal and presence of an open apex by radiograph
* Ca(OH)2 treatment for at least one week prior to obturation
* use of MTA to produce an artificial apical barrier
* placement of a final restoration
* radiographs codumenting pretreatment and immedicate post-treatment conditionof the tooth
* patients ages 5-40 years old

Exclusion Criteria

* patients younger than 5 and greater than 40 years old
* patients unable to be contacted for recall during the study
* patients with a medical condition whose health would be jeopardized by participation in the study
Minimum Eligible Age

5 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

40 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

59th Medical Wing

FED

Sponsor Role collaborator

The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Kenneth Hargreaves

Chair, Dept. of Endodontics

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

David Holden, DMD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Texas

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Texas Health Science Center

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

HSC20070204

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.