Augment® Bone Graft (Formerly GEM OS™1 Bone Graft) Compared to Autologous Bone Graft in Foot and Ankle Fusions

NCT ID: NCT00583375

Last Updated: 2018-04-02

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

414 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2007-04-30

Study Completion Date

2010-02-28

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Demonstrate equivalent clinical and radiologic outcomes to the "gold standard" (ABG) in a representative clinical model (hindfoot and ankle fusions)

STUDY HYPOTHESIS: Augment® Bone Graft is an equivalent bone grafting substitute to autologous bone graft in applications as shown by non-inferiority analysis

STUDY RATIONALE: Evaluate a fully synthetic growth-factor enhanced bone graft substitute to facilitate fusion in conditions or injuries requiring bone graft in a representative clinical fusion model and thus the opportunity to provide equivalent union rates as ABG without necessitating an additional invasive procedure to harvest the graft

REGULATORY PHASE: Investigational Device Exemption (IDE) for Premarket Approval (PMA) Application as a bone regeneration system, pivotal phase

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Foot Fusion

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Group 1

Standard Rigid Fixation plus autograft

Standard of Care: Autologous Bone Graft

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Standard of Care

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Autologous Bone Graft

Group 2

Standard Rigid Fixation plus Augment® Bone Graft

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Augment® Bone Graft

Intervention Type DEVICE

Augment® Bone Graft

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Augment® Bone Graft

Augment® Bone Graft

Intervention Type DEVICE

Standard of Care

Autologous Bone Graft

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1\) Bone defect in the hindfoot or ankle requiring fusion using open surgical technique with supplemental bone graft/substitute, requiring one of the following procedures:

* Ankle joint fusion
* Subtalar fusion
* Calcaneocuboid fusion
* Talonavicular fusion
* Triple arthrodesis (subtalar, talonavicular and calcaneocuboid joints)
* Double fusions (talonavicular and calcaneocuboid joints)

Exclusion Criteria

1. Previous fusion surgery of the proposed fusion site.
2. The patient uses chronic medications known to affect the skeleton (e.g. glucocorticoid usage \> 10mg/day).
3. Pregnant or a female intending to become pregnant during this study period.
4. Morbidly obese (BMI \> 45 kg/m2)
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

BioMimetic Therapeutics

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Christopher DiGiovanni, M.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Rhode Island Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Tucson Orthopaedic Institute

Tucson, Arizona, United States

Site Status

California Pacific Orthopaedics & Sports Medicine

San Francisco, California, United States

Site Status

Santa Cruz Orthopaedic Institute

Santa Cruz, California, United States

Site Status

Hartford Hospital Orthopaedic Center

Hartford, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

The Center for Bone & Joint Surgery

Royal Palm Beach, Florida, United States

Site Status

Southern Orthopaedic Center

Savannah, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Illinois Bone and Joint Institute, Ltd.

Glenview, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Loyola University Medical Center

Maywood, Illinois, United States

Site Status

SIU School of Medicine

Springfield, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Advanced Orthopaedic Associates

Wichita, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Union Memorial Hospital

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Mid Michigan Orthopaedic Institute

East Lansing, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Orthopaedic Associates of Grand Rapids

Grand Rapids, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Henry Ford Hospital - West Bloomfield

West Bloomfield, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Desert Orthopaedic Center

Las Vegas, Nevada, United States

Site Status

UMDNJ

Newark, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Hospital for Special Surgery

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Columbia University Medical Center

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

University of Rochester Medical Center

Rochester, New York, United States

Site Status

Ortho Carolina Research Institute

Charlotte, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Duke Health Center

Durham, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Cleveland Clinic

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Orthopedic Foot & Ankle Center

Columbus, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Orthopaedic & Neurosurgical Care & Research

Bend, Oregon, United States

Site Status

The Rothman Institute

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

University Orthopaedics, Inc

Providence, Rhode Island, United States

Site Status

Campbell Clinic

Germantown, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Vanderbilt University Medical Center

Nashville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Bone and Joint Clinic of Houston

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

The Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Center

Arlington, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Marshfield Clinic

Marshfield, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Peter Lougheed Centre

Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Site Status

St. Paul's Hospital

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Center

Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada

Site Status

The Ottawa Hospital, General Campus

Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

St. Michael's Hospital

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

University Health Network

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Canada

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

BMTI-2006-01

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.