Evaluation of Trinity Evolution in Patients Undergoing Foot and Ankle Fusion

NCT ID: NCT00988338

Last Updated: 2021-10-28

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

106 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2009-09-30

Study Completion Date

2013-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to utilize Trinity Evolution as a graft source in foot/ankle fusions and to follow the subjects to measure the clinical outcomes and fusion rate. The hypothesis of the study is that Trinity Evolution will result in fusion rates and clinical outcomes similar to those obtained from autograft and other routinely used allograft materials; these include: fusion, improvement in pain, improvement in function, and absence of adverse events related to the use of the graft source.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Symptomatic arthritic conditions of the foot and ankle including osteoarthritis, post-traumatic arthritis, inflammatory arthropathies and others can be painful and disabling conditions that lead to a reduced quality of life. Major symptoms include pain, stiffness, swelling, and difficulty walking. Many patients may be initially treatable with non-invasive measures such as analgesics, ankle-foot orthosis, physical therapy and medications such as steroids; however, over time, surgery becomes necessary to improve quality of life and maintain function. Arthrodesis is a well-known procedure that can reduce pain and result in a foot/ankle that can withstand an active lifestyle.

Bone graft is used to stimulate new bone formation at the operative site by providing osteogenic cells with osteoinductive factors with an osteoconductive matrix. Although autologous bone is often used as the structural graft material for fusion procedures, donor site morbidity (e.g., pain, infection, and fracture), limited supply, and inconsistent osteogenic activity continue to be associated problems. The quality of an autograft is dependent upon the age and medical condition of the patient, as well as the number of viable mesenchymal and osteoprogenitor stem cells that are present in the specimen. This tissue is harvested during the surgical procedure; the process can prolong morbidity at the harvest site. The ideal bone graft would offer osteogenic cells, osteoinductive factors, and an osteoconductive matrix with a consistent supply of viable mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and osteoprogenitor cells (OPCs)-but without the morbidity of autograft.

Due to the limitations associated with autograft, researchers are pursuing the use of bone-graft substitutes to promote arthrodesis. Bone-graft substitutes now being used by surgeons include ceramic synthetics, bone morphogenic proteins (BMPs), demineralized bone matrices (DBMs) and other allografts; these may be used alone or in combination. Allografts available as substitutes for autograft offer some of the benefits of autograft without its limitations-but do not contain viable MSCs and OPCs.

Trinity Evolution is an allogeneic cancellous bone matrix containing demineralized cortical bone (DCB) as well as viable osteoprogenitor and mesenchymal stem cells. Adult mesenchymal stem cells and osteoprogenitor cells, such as those in Trinity Evolution, are the precursor cells that differentiate into osteoblasts-the cells responsible for bone growth and repair.

Trinity Evolution provides the required osteoconduction, osteogenesis, and osteoinductivity necessary for successful bone grafting. It offers viable osteoprogenitor and mesenchymal stem cells and demineralized cortical bone-all in a single product. Data from preclinical studies with Trinity Evolution have demonstrated in-vitro and in-vivo safety and effectiveness. Trinity Evolution is a "minimally manipulated" tissue that is considered an allograft, and as such, is labeled for bone repair for all orthopedic and podiatric indications where autograft is used. In this study, Trinity Evolution will be used as a substitute for autograft and/or standard allograft in the following arthrodesis procedures: tibiotalar, subtalar, calcaneocuboid, talonavicular, double fusions (i.e. calcaneocuboid and talonavicular), and triple fusions (i.e. subtalar, calcaneocuboid, and talonavicular).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Tibiotalar Arthrodesis Subtalar Arthrodesis Calcaneocuboid Arthrodesis Talonavicular Arthrodesis Double Arthrodesis (i.e. Calcaneocuboid and Talonavicular) Triple Arthrodesis (i.e. Subtalar, Calcaneocuboid, and Talonavicular)

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Trinity Evolution Arthrodesis Foot Fusion Ankle Fusion Allograft

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Trinity Evolution

Trinity Evolution

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Novel Allogeneic, Cancellous, Bone Matrix Containing Viable Stem and Osteoprogenitor Cells

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Trinity Evolution

Novel Allogeneic, Cancellous, Bone Matrix Containing Viable Stem and Osteoprogenitor Cells

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Allograft Mesenchymal Stem Cells

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Foot and/or ankle pathology requiring fusion using open surgical technique with supplemental bone graft/substitute requiring one of the following procedures:

* Ankle joint fusion
* Subtalar fusion
* Calcaneocuboid fusion
* Talonavicular fusion
* Double fusions (talonavicular and calcaneocuboid joints)
* Triple fusions (subtalar, talonavicular, and calcaneocuboid joints)
* At least 18 years of age
* Willing and able to comply with the requirements of the protocol including follow-up requirements
* Willing and able to sign a study-specific informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria

* Use of any other bone graft or bone graft substitute in addition to or in place of Trinity Evolution at the time of surgery
* Use of adjunctive post-operative stimulation
* Active local or systemic infection
* Currently pregnant or considering becoming pregnant during the follow-up period
* Active malignancy or having been on chemotherapy of any kind for a malignancy in the past 1 year
* Immunosuppressive therapy of any kind within the past 1 year
* Has a known history of hypersensitivity or anaphylactic reaction to dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO).
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Orthofix Inc.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Raymond J Linovitz, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Orthofix Inc.

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Orthopaedic Associates of South Broward, PA

Hollywood, Florida, United States

Site Status

Sinai Hospital of Baltimore / Rubin Institute for Advanced Orthopedics

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

New Mexico Orthopedics

Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States

Site Status

OrthoCarolina Research Institute

Charlotte, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Duke University Medical Center

Durham, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Ohio Orthopedic Center of Excellence

Upper Arlington, Ohio, United States

Site Status

The Western Pennsylvania Hospital

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

University Orthopedics Center

State College, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Central Tennessee Foot and Ankle Center

Sparta, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Franciscan Foot and Ankle Specialists

Burien, Washington, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

TY01AF

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id