Evaluation of Trinity Evolution in Patients Undergoing Foot and Ankle Fusion
NCT ID: NCT00988338
Last Updated: 2021-10-28
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
106 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2009-09-30
2013-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Bone graft is used to stimulate new bone formation at the operative site by providing osteogenic cells with osteoinductive factors with an osteoconductive matrix. Although autologous bone is often used as the structural graft material for fusion procedures, donor site morbidity (e.g., pain, infection, and fracture), limited supply, and inconsistent osteogenic activity continue to be associated problems. The quality of an autograft is dependent upon the age and medical condition of the patient, as well as the number of viable mesenchymal and osteoprogenitor stem cells that are present in the specimen. This tissue is harvested during the surgical procedure; the process can prolong morbidity at the harvest site. The ideal bone graft would offer osteogenic cells, osteoinductive factors, and an osteoconductive matrix with a consistent supply of viable mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and osteoprogenitor cells (OPCs)-but without the morbidity of autograft.
Due to the limitations associated with autograft, researchers are pursuing the use of bone-graft substitutes to promote arthrodesis. Bone-graft substitutes now being used by surgeons include ceramic synthetics, bone morphogenic proteins (BMPs), demineralized bone matrices (DBMs) and other allografts; these may be used alone or in combination. Allografts available as substitutes for autograft offer some of the benefits of autograft without its limitations-but do not contain viable MSCs and OPCs.
Trinity Evolution is an allogeneic cancellous bone matrix containing demineralized cortical bone (DCB) as well as viable osteoprogenitor and mesenchymal stem cells. Adult mesenchymal stem cells and osteoprogenitor cells, such as those in Trinity Evolution, are the precursor cells that differentiate into osteoblasts-the cells responsible for bone growth and repair.
Trinity Evolution provides the required osteoconduction, osteogenesis, and osteoinductivity necessary for successful bone grafting. It offers viable osteoprogenitor and mesenchymal stem cells and demineralized cortical bone-all in a single product. Data from preclinical studies with Trinity Evolution have demonstrated in-vitro and in-vivo safety and effectiveness. Trinity Evolution is a "minimally manipulated" tissue that is considered an allograft, and as such, is labeled for bone repair for all orthopedic and podiatric indications where autograft is used. In this study, Trinity Evolution will be used as a substitute for autograft and/or standard allograft in the following arthrodesis procedures: tibiotalar, subtalar, calcaneocuboid, talonavicular, double fusions (i.e. calcaneocuboid and talonavicular), and triple fusions (i.e. subtalar, calcaneocuboid, and talonavicular).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Trinity Evolution
Trinity Evolution
Novel Allogeneic, Cancellous, Bone Matrix Containing Viable Stem and Osteoprogenitor Cells
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Trinity Evolution
Novel Allogeneic, Cancellous, Bone Matrix Containing Viable Stem and Osteoprogenitor Cells
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Ankle joint fusion
* Subtalar fusion
* Calcaneocuboid fusion
* Talonavicular fusion
* Double fusions (talonavicular and calcaneocuboid joints)
* Triple fusions (subtalar, talonavicular, and calcaneocuboid joints)
* At least 18 years of age
* Willing and able to comply with the requirements of the protocol including follow-up requirements
* Willing and able to sign a study-specific informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria
* Use of adjunctive post-operative stimulation
* Active local or systemic infection
* Currently pregnant or considering becoming pregnant during the follow-up period
* Active malignancy or having been on chemotherapy of any kind for a malignancy in the past 1 year
* Immunosuppressive therapy of any kind within the past 1 year
* Has a known history of hypersensitivity or anaphylactic reaction to dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO).
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Orthofix Inc.
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Raymond J Linovitz, MD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Orthofix Inc.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Orthopaedic Associates of South Broward, PA
Hollywood, Florida, United States
Sinai Hospital of Baltimore / Rubin Institute for Advanced Orthopedics
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
New Mexico Orthopedics
Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States
OrthoCarolina Research Institute
Charlotte, North Carolina, United States
Duke University Medical Center
Durham, North Carolina, United States
Ohio Orthopedic Center of Excellence
Upper Arlington, Ohio, United States
The Western Pennsylvania Hospital
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
University Orthopedics Center
State College, Pennsylvania, United States
Central Tennessee Foot and Ankle Center
Sparta, Tennessee, United States
Franciscan Foot and Ankle Specialists
Burien, Washington, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
TY01AF
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id