Ropivacaine Versus Ropivacaine Plus Mepivacaine for Sciatic Block

NCT ID: NCT00567450

Last Updated: 2009-01-28

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

30 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2007-09-30

Study Completion Date

2008-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

In loco regional anesthesia, much more than for general anesthesia, the choice of the product is largely left at the discretion of the practitioner. Two categories of local anesthetics are distinguished according to their pharmacodynamic characteristics: products with a short time of installation and a short duration period, and products with a longer delay of installation of the sensitive and motor block, but with a long-term duration. Indeed, the combined use of two products pharmacodynamically different seems to be of a practical interest.

This study provides a comparison of the onset of action of 30 ml of ropivacaine 0.75% and 30ml of a mixture of ropivacaïne 0.75% associated with mepivacaïne 1.5% for the subgluteal sciatic nerve block. This is a prospective randomized double-blind study where the main criterion of judgment is the time of installation of a sensitive block compatible with surgery in the sciatic territory nerve. Fifteen patients per group were calculated to detect a 50% decrease of the onset of action in the combination group with a power of 90% and alpha to 5%, according to a previous pilot study. The secondary endpoints are the intensity and time of installation of the motor block, the duration of sensitive and motor block, the total dose of morphine administered within 48 hours, as well as its possible side effects.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Subgluteal Sciatic Block

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Caregivers

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

B

30ml of a mixture of ropivacaïne 0.75% associated with mepivacaïne 1.5%

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

ropivacaine plus mepivacaine

Intervention Type DRUG

30ml of a mixture of ropivacaïne 0.75% associated with mepivacaïne 1.5%

A

30 ml of ropivacaine 0.75%

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

ropivacaine

Intervention Type DRUG

30ml of a mixture of ropivacaïne 0.75%

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

ropivacaine

30ml of a mixture of ropivacaïne 0.75%

Intervention Type DRUG

ropivacaine plus mepivacaine

30ml of a mixture of ropivacaïne 0.75% associated with mepivacaïne 1.5%

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* age \> 18 years
* surgery of the foot under sciatic block

Exclusion Criteria

* no indication of locoregional anesthesia
* polyneuropathy or any neurological disease
* know hypersensitivity to local anesthetics
* porphyria
* atrio-ventricular block
* not controlled epilepsia
* hypovolemia
* pregnancy
* anticoagulant treatment
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Amiens

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Anesthesiology and Critical Care Department

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Campana Philippe, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Anesthesiology department

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

CHU d'Amiens, Pole Anesthesie Réanimation, Place Victor Pauchet

Amiens, , France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

EudraCT: 2007-002254-31

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

AFFSAPS: A70388-33

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

2007-002254-31

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.