Intermittent Ropivacaine Bolus for Epidural Labor Analgesia

NCT ID: NCT02809742

Last Updated: 2019-07-08

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

500 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-05-31

Study Completion Date

2019-07-04

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Enhanced patient safety and satisfaction have contributed to growing use of epidural labor analgesia. Epidural analgesia appears to be currently the most effective technique in reducing pain during labor. However, reduction in total dose of local anesthetic and thus motor blockade is crucial to improve the obstetric outcome. This technique has evolved from intermittent boluses by anesthesiologists to the current standard labor epidural analgesic regimens in many institutions in North America and Europe that consist of a local anesthetic in combination with an opioid delivered via continuous epidural infusion (CEI) with or without patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) boluses. Recently,a new mode of administration has been used: regular bolus of low concentration local anesthetic + intermittent bolus (PIEB). This technique would offer safe and superior quality labor analgesia and greater maternal satisfaction by reducing total amount of the drug combination.

The primary outcome was to evaluate the analgesic efficacy of PIEB epidural drug delivery in terms of visual analogue scale satisfaction (VAS) score in a large cohort of patients. The secondary outcomes were to measure the degree of motor blockade, neonatal and obstetric outcomes, total drug dose and incidence of pain that required top-up administration (breakthrough pain)

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Patients were explained about the procedure and written informed consent was obtained. Healthy term primi or second gravid parturients (aged \>18 years) with a singleton, live fetus in vertex presentation when in active stage of labor with cervical dilation of 3-5 cm were recruited in the study after they requested epidural for pain relief. PIEB epidural analgesia was used.

Primary outcome was maternal satisfaction during labor and delivery. Our hypothesis was that patients would have a greater level of satisfaction when using PIEB technique. The secondary outcomes were to measure the degree of motor blockade, neonatal and obstetric outcomes.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Labor Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Epidural group

Epidural : automatic intermittent boluses ( 8-12 mL per hour) + patient controlled bolus (4 mL evrey 20 min) using ropivacaine

Ropivacaine

Intervention Type DRUG

Epidural : automatic intermittent boluses associated with patient controlled bolus using ropivacaine

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Ropivacaine

Epidural : automatic intermittent boluses associated with patient controlled bolus using ropivacaine

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

ropivacaine 2 mg/ml

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* healthy term primi or second gravid parturients
* aged 18-30 years
* singleton, live fetus
* vertex presentation
* active stage of labor with cervical dilation of 3-5 cm parturients

Exclusion Criteria

* Hypertension
* no vertex presentation
* contraindications to neuraxial blockade
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

40 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Pierre and Marie Curie University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Philippe Cuvillon

MD, PhD

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

CHU Nimes

Nîmes, Gard, France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

PMCurrieU2

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.