Comparing Effectiveness of CSE Versus DPE for Labor Analgesia
NCT ID: NCT05068661
Last Updated: 2024-11-06
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
101 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-11-21
2023-12-07
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Tetracaine Combined Spinal Epidural (CSE) Versus Bupivacaine CSE
NCT01005459
Dosing Strategies for Automated Mandatory Intermittent Boluses Technique for Epidural Labour Analgesia
NCT01205360
Epidural Volume Extension and Intrathecal Use of Local Anesthetics in Cesarean Sections
NCT01558713
Effects of Bupivacaine Induced Motor Blockade During the Second Stage of Labor
NCT01621230
Trial of Onset of Epidural Pain Relief With Low Dose Bupivacaine and Different Doses of Fentanyl in Laboring Women
NCT02004899
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Subject identification and recruitment:
Women admitted to the Duke Birthing Center for spontaneous or induced labor will be screened. After usual consultation with the anesthesia team is completed and consent for anesthesia services are obtained, eligible patients will be approached to by a member of the study team. As indicated below, we will plan to enroll up to 120 patients to have 100 patients with complete data (50 for the CSE group and 50 for the DPE group).
Assignment of Study Cohorts:
Study participants will be randomized by computer-generated sequence to CSE or DPE arms, stratified by parity (nulliparous versus multiparous). After the consented and enrolled participant requests labor epidural, a study member will give the anesthesia provider a sealed envelope with study assignment for either standard CSE or DPE technique.
Epidural technique:
Once the patient requests labor analgesia, the usual standard of care for epidural placement will be initiated. The patient will receive 500-1000 mL fluid preload. Vitals will be monitored by the labor nurse, including continuous pulse oximetry, non-invasive blood-pressure monitoring, and external tocodynamometry. Anesthesia time-out will be performed by the anesthesia provider with participation from the nurse and the patient.
All patients will receive a neuraxial technique in the sitting position at L3/4 or L4/5 using loss of resistance to saline. In both the CSE and DPE groups, a 25-G Whitacre needle will be used to puncture the dura. In the CSE group, 10 mcg of preservative-free fentanyl and 2 mg of preservative-free isobaric 0.25% bupivacaine will be administered into the intrathecal space. In both groups, the epidural catheter will be threaded 5 cm into the epidural space. In the DPE group, an initiation dose of 20 mL of ropivacaine 0.1% with fentanyl (2 mcg/mL) over 6 minutes. This would not be administered in the CSE group. Labor analgesia will be maintained by programmed intermittent bolus with 8 mL of the same solution every 45 minutes starting 30 minutes after the initial dose. Patients will have patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) available with an 10 mL dose per demand, every 10 minutes, for a maximum dose of 50 mL for every hour.
Data Collection:
After the block is placed, a blinded provider will enter the room to collect data. Data will be collected every 3 minutes for the first 30 minutes or until pain score is 1 or 0 with uterine contractions. Subsequent assessments will be every 2 hours until delivery.
Management of breakthrough pain will be standardized.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
SEQUENTIAL
TREATMENT
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Combined Spinal Epidural
10 mcg of preservative-free fentanyl and 2 mg of preservative-free isobaric 0.25% bupivacaine will be administered into the intrathecal space to initiate analgesia. Labor analgesia will be maintained by programmed intermittent bolus with patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) as per standard of care.
Ropivacaine 0.1% Injectable Solution
DPE
Bupivacaine 0.25% Injectable Solution
CSE
Dural Puncture Epidural
A 25-G Whitacre needle will be used to puncture the dura. An initiation dose of 20 mL of ropivacaine 0.1% with fentanyl (2 mcg/mL) will be administered. Labor analgesia will be maintained by programmed intermittent bolus with patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) as per standard of care.
Ropivacaine 0.1% Injectable Solution
DPE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Ropivacaine 0.1% Injectable Solution
DPE
Bupivacaine 0.25% Injectable Solution
CSE
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
45 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Duke University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Ashraf S Habib, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Duke University Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Duke University Hospital
Durham, North Carolina, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Pro00108996
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.