Addition of Buprenorphine to Paracervical Block for Pain Control During Osmotic Dilator Insertion
NCT ID: NCT04254081
Last Updated: 2023-08-01
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
57 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2020-05-28
2021-05-04
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Primary Aim: To compare the mean pain score at the time of osmotic dilator insertion among women randomized to a 1% lidocaine and buprenorphine paracervical block compared to a 1% lidocaine paracervical block alone.
Secondary Aim: To compare the mean pain score 2 hours after osmotic dilator insertion among women randomized to a lidocaine and buprenorphine paracervical block compared to a lidocaine paracervical block alone.
The investigators hypothesize that in patients undergoing osmotic dilator insertion in preparation for dilation and evacuation, the addition of buprenorphine 0.15mg to a 1% lidocaine paracervical block will be associated with lower mean pain scores at time of osmotic dilator insertion compared to women who receive a 1% lidocaine paracervical block alone.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparing Effectiveness of CSE Versus DPE for Labor Analgesia
NCT05068661
Paracervical Block Before Intrauterine Device (IUD) Insertion
NCT01207401
Continuous Erector Spinae Plane Blocks to Treat Postoperative Pain After Open Gynecologic Procedures Via a Low Transverse (Pfannenstiel) Incision
NCT05082155
Intra-operative Uterosacral Ligament Bupivacaine Injection During Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy
NCT04157075
Pain Control for Intrauterine Device Placement Using Paracervical Block
NCT02219308
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
There are many adjunct treatments to optimize the duration of local analgesia from a peripheral nerve block. Buprenorphine, a partial mu-opioid receptor agonist, is a high potency, lipophilic opioid and has a high binding capacity for the mu-opioid receptor. Because of the high binding capacity, buprenorphine has the longest duration of action of all opioids. When administered perineurally in combination with a local anesthetic, buprenorphine has been found to drastically increase the duration of analgesia at several anatomic sites, including axillary and subclavian brachial plexus blocks and infragluteal sciatic nerve blocks. With the addition of buprenorphine at doses of 0.15 - 0.3mg, there is significant prolongation of the anesthetic sensory blockade up to three times the duration of the local anesthetic alone. The use of perineural buprenorphine is well established for postoperative analgesia. Buprenorphine itself also has local anesthetic properties. Buprenorphine blocks voltage gated sodium channels and inhibits C-fiber action potentials, thereby contributing to an analgesic effect. Buprenorphine not only prolongs the duration of local anesthetic effect but also improves the analgesic properties when administered in a perineural block.
The addition of buprenorphine to a perineural local anesthetic has not been studied in a paracervical block. This study will be the first trial to assess the efficacy of buprenorphine to provide analgesia for a gynecologic procedure. This medication has the additional benefit of providing long lasting pain relief for procedures that cause continued discomfort after the end of the procedure. The investigators hypothesize that the addition of 0.15mg of buprenorphine to a lidocaine paracervical block will improve pain during osmotic dilator insertion and provide continued pain relief several hours after osmotic dilator insertion. If this intervention proves to provide better pain control than a lidocaine paracervical block alone, it would be an intervention for women during a painful clinic procedure.
A total of 114 women undergoing D\&E who require cervical preparation with osmotic dilators will be randomized to one of two study groups: (1) paracervical block with 20mL of 1% buffered lidocaine or (2) paracervical block with 20mL of 1% buffered lidocaine plus 0.15mg of buprenorphine. Participants, clinicians performing the procedure, and study personnel administering questionnaires will be blinded to study assignment. Participants will rate their level of pain on an 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS) during the insertion of osmotic dilators and at several time points after insertion. The primary outcome is to compare the median pain score at the time of osmotic dilator insertion in women randomized to a 1% lidocaine and buprenorphine paracervical block compared to a 1% lidocaine paracervical block alone. Secondary outcomes are to compare the median pain score 2 hours after osmotic dilator insertion; to assess overall narcotic and ibuprofen use after osmotic dilator placement and before dilation and evacuation procedure; to assess opioid related side effects; and to determine patient satisfaction with pain control during and after osmotic dilator insertion.
Primary Hypothesis: The addition of buprenorphine 0.15mg to a paracervical block using 1% lidocaine will be associated with a lower median pain score on the NRS at time of osmotic dilator insertion compared to women who receive a lidocaine paracervical block alone.
Secondary Hypothesis: The addition of buprenorphine 0.15mg to a paracervical block using 1% lidocaine will be associated with a lower median pain score on the NRS 2 hours after osmotic dilator insertion compared to women who receive a lidocaine paracervical block alone.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Buprenorphine 0.15mg + 1% lidocaine paracervical block
Paracervical block with 18mL of 1% lidocaine buffered with 2 mL 8.4% sodium bicarbonate plus 0.15mg of buprenorphine
Buprenorphine 0.15 MG
Buprenorphine 0.15mg solution will be added to a 20mL 1% buffered lidocaine solution (paracervical block) which will be administered in the paracervical space prior to osmotic dilator insertion.
1% lidocaine paracervical block
Paracervical block with 18 mL of 1% lidocaine buffered with 2 mL 8.4% sodium bicarbonate
Lidocaine 1% Injectable Solution
20mL of 1% buffered lidocaine solution (paracervical block) will be administered in the paracervical space prior to osmotic dilator insertion.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Buprenorphine 0.15 MG
Buprenorphine 0.15mg solution will be added to a 20mL 1% buffered lidocaine solution (paracervical block) which will be administered in the paracervical space prior to osmotic dilator insertion.
Lidocaine 1% Injectable Solution
20mL of 1% buffered lidocaine solution (paracervical block) will be administered in the paracervical space prior to osmotic dilator insertion.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Require cervical preparation with placement of osmotic dilators
* At least 18 years of age
* Fluent in English or Spanish
Exclusion Criteria
* Request for sedation during osmotic dilator insertion
* Liver disease
* Allergy to buprenorphine, lidocaine, or ibuprofen
* Narcotic or opioid medication use in the preceding 24 hours
* Use of recreational/illicit medications in the preceding 24 hours
* Currently incarcerated
18 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Society of Family Planning
OTHER
University of California, San Diego
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Sheila Mody
Associate Clinical Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Nicole Economou, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
UC San Diego Health
Sheila K Mody, MD, MPH
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
UC San Diego Health
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of California San Diego Health
San Diego, California, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Schivone GB, Lerma K, Montgomery C, Wright P, Conti JA, Blumenthal PD, Shaw KA. Self-administered lidocaine gel for local anesthesia prior to osmotic dilator placement: a randomized trial. Contraception. 2019 Mar;99(3):148-151. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2018.11.013. Epub 2018 Nov 27.
Soon R, Tschann M, Salcedo J, Stevens K, Ahn HJ, Kaneshiro B. Paracervical Block for Laminaria Insertion Before Second-Trimester Abortion: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Aug;130(2):387-392. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002149.
Mercier RJ, Liberty A. Intrauterine lidocaine for pain control during laminaria insertion: a randomized controlled trial. Contraception. 2014 Dec;90(6):594-600. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2014.07.008. Epub 2014 Jul 23.
Creinin MD, Schimmoeller NR, Matulich MC, Hou MY, Melo J, Chen MJ. Gabapentin for pain management after osmotic dilator insertion and prior to dilation and evacuation: A randomized controlled trial. Contraception. 2020 Mar;101(3):167-173. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2019.12.001. Epub 2020 Jan 10.
Kosel J, Bobik P, Tomczyk M. Buprenorphine--the unique opioid adjuvant in regional anesthesia. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol. 2016;9(3):375-83. doi: 10.1586/17512433.2016.1141047. Epub 2016 Jan 28.
Bailard NS, Ortiz J, Flores RA. Additives to local anesthetics for peripheral nerve blocks: Evidence, limitations, and recommendations. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2014 Mar 1;71(5):373-85. doi: 10.2146/ajhp130336.
Swain A, Nag DS, Sahu S, Samaddar DP. Adjuvants to local anesthetics: Current understanding and future trends. World J Clin Cases. 2017 Aug 16;5(8):307-323. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v5.i8.307.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Document Type: Informed Consent Form
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
192033
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.