Comparing Bupivacaine, Lidocaine, and a Combination of Bupivacaine and Lidocaine for Labor Epidural Activation
NCT ID: NCT03103100
Last Updated: 2020-08-31
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
75 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2015-10-08
2019-09-09
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Bupivacaine With Epidural Volume Extension
NCT03110003
Trial of Onset of Epidural Pain Relief With Low Dose Bupivacaine and Different Doses of Fentanyl in Laboring Women
NCT02004899
Epidural Neostigmine for Labor Pain
NCT00779467
Comparison of Chloroprocaine vs Lidocaine for Epidural Anesthesia in Cesarean Delivery
NCT03414359
Perioperative Epidural Versus Intravenous Local Anesthetic Infusion in Open Upper Abdominal Surgery
NCT03005171
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Two commonly used LA to provide labor analgesia are bupivacaine and lidocaine. When low concentrations - 0.25% bupivacaine and 1% lidocaine - are used for labor analgesia, both of these LA can be administered safely with very little concern of major adverse effects associated with LA toxicity. Given that there is limited and conflicting evidence for the usefulness of the bupivacaine and lidocaine mixture especially as it relates to labor epidural activation, we hope to readdress these questions in an effort to determine whether or not the LA combination offers any distinct advantage over the individual LA. The investigators intend to determine the time it takes to achieve an adequate level (T10) for labor analgesia, the total spread of local anesthetic, and the degree of motor block as these factors will be important in determining the most optimal LA solution to activate a labor epidural. With the results from this study, the investigators hope to recommend a LA solution that will allow for the fastest pain relief in the laboring mother with the fewest side effects.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
1% Lidocaine
Patients randomized into the lidocaine group will receive 10 mL of 1% lidocaine
1% Lidocaine
10 mL of 1% lidocaine
0.25% Bupivacaine
Patients randomized into the bupivacaine group will receive 10 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine
0.25% Bupivacaine
10 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine
Bupivacaine plus Lidocaine
Patients randomized into the bupivacaine group will receive 5 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine and 5 mL of 1% lidocaine.
Bupivacaine plus Lidocaine
5 mL of 1% lidocaine and 5 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
1% Lidocaine
10 mL of 1% lidocaine
0.25% Bupivacaine
10 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine
Bupivacaine plus Lidocaine
5 mL of 1% lidocaine and 5 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* allergy to the drug or drug class
* preexisting neuropathy
* history of back pain prior to pregnancy or history of back surgery
* history of chronic opioid use
* history of hypertension or hypertensive disorders of pregnancy
* congenital or acquired cardiac disease
* contraindication to epidural placement (patient refusal, severe coagulopathy, infection at site of epidural needle insertion, severe hypovolemia)
19 Years
60 Years
FEMALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Alabama at Birmingham
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Mark Powell
Assistant Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Mark F Powell, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
UAB Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
F140903008
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.